Skip to content

Science Not yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher 2 min read Published

Rat-free atolls with seabirds have reefs growing up to 2.5 times faster

A Lancaster-led study finds reefs around rat-free atolls grow 1.8 to 2.5 times faster than those around rat-infested islands. The comparison is across islands and the rates are calculated potentials, so it says little about one island's recovery after eradication.

The Scientist · Science desk

How we use AI Send a correction

Photograph accompanying Rat-free atolls with seabirds have reefs growing up to 2.5 times faster
Photo: nature.com
Reefs at seabird islands make more sediment too Ratios set reefs at rat-free islands with seabirds against reefs at rat-infested islands, across 28 atoll islands; sediment figures are estimates.

Sediment production on lagoonal and ocean-facing reefs at islands with seabirds is estimated at 2.3 to 2.8 times higher. Lagoonal reef growth at rat-free islands is 1.8 times that at rat-infested islands. The data cover 28 atoll islands.

Reefs at seabird islands make more sediment too
FigureValueNoteClaim
Sediment production, seabird islands, at least2.3 times higherestimated; up to 2.8 times higher9
Lagoonal reefs, rat-free1.8 x reef growth6
Atoll islands in the data28 islands2

What happened

  • The team combined ecological datasets for 28 atoll islands in the Seychelles, the Chagos Archipelago and Tetiaroa atoll in French Polynesia.
  • Seabirds and native vegetation had a positive effect on three processes tied to resilience: coral reef growth, sediment production and soil stabilization.
  • Corals grew much faster and calcified faster on reefs around islands with healthy seabird populations than at bird-free islands, forming more hard reef substrate.
  • Sediment production potential, linked to greater parrotfish biomass, was estimated at 2.3 to 2.8 times higher on lagoonal and ocean-facing reefs at islands with seabirds.

Why it matters

  • decision Managers of rat-infested islands with old coconut stands face two separate jobs, eradication and replanting, and the lead author's case is for doing both.
  • capability Reef accretion potential gives planners a way to put a number on what an eradication might add to reef growth before they commit to one.
  • constraint Where coconut dominates, as across Pacific atolls, the study's evidence is one atoll deep, so carrying the Indian Ocean results over is an assumption.

The study, published in Science Advances, used seabird census counts to estimate how much "energy" the birds bring from the open ocean to each island, and how the nutrients in their droppings affect the island and the marine ecosystems around it [1][3]. The comparison behind the growth ratios is then between islands. The study treats rat-free islands as islands with abundant seabirds [6], so rat status is the grouping variable and seabird abundance is inferred from it.

Reef growth is key to reducing wave-driven erosion of island coastlines [12]. Co-author Casey Benkwitt of The Nature Conservancy said the accretion rates for rat-free, bird-populated lagoonal reefs "would be sufficient to closely keep up with predicted sea-level rises up to the end of the century", under a 2 degrees C warming scenario [7]. Benkwitt added: "In contrast, reef growth rates without seabird populations are predicted to have limited ability to keep up with projected sea-level rises." [8]

That statement covers lagoonal reefs under one warming scenario [7]. The thing the comparison doesn't tell you is how long a seabird colony takes to return after rats are removed, or whether a formerly infested island's reefs then grow at the rat-free rate. In our view, answering that takes islands followed through an eradication, and a comparison across islands cannot supply it.

Nick Graham, the lead author, described atolls as active systems. "Atoll islands are not static; they are naturally active systems that can change and adapt to their environmental conditions if they are allowed to do so," Graham said [14]. Rats arrived as stowaways on boats in previous centuries, and many islands lost their seabirds to the combination of lost roosting habitat and those predators [11].

The replanting half of the proposal covers a lot of ground. Coconut plantations are estimated to dominate around 60% of Pacific atoll forests [10].

What to watch

  • Seabird and reef measurements from islands before and after a rat eradication, which would test the cross-island comparison directly.
  • Pacific atoll data beyond Tetiaroa, where coconut plantations cover most of the forest.
  • Measured shoreline change on islands with recovering seabirds, to check the modelled sediment and reef-growth potentials.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence55
Adoption
Insufficient
Hype gap+20
Incentives
Insufficient
Confidence50
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    The study was published in the journal Science Advances by an international team of researchers led by marine scientists at Lancaster University.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  2. [2]

    The researchers combined ecological data sets for 28 Indian and Pacific Ocean atoll islands across the Seychelles and the Chagos Archipelago in the Indian Ocean, and Tetiaroa atoll in French Polynesia in the Pacific.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  3. [3]

    Using seabird census data, the researchers estimated the amount of 'energy' seabirds bring from the open ocean back to each atoll island and how the nutrients deposited in their droppings influence the islands and surrounding marine ecosystems.

    Reported SupportedView cited source

Get this ledger inside ChatGPT. Ask about any of our stories and the answer brings its figure, each claim’s verdict and the sources. Free, no account.

Add to ChatGPTAdd to Claude

Sources

1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. phys.org

    1 article · October 14, 2026

    Removing rats and restoring native plants could help atolls withstand rising seas

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Topics

Entities

Loading related stories