InvestNot yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher2 min readPublished
Citrini Research skips Bitcoin in a crypto basket built on AI agents moving money
Citrini Research's latest crypto basket leaves out Bitcoin and backs the blockchain infrastructure that AI agents could use to move money. Citrini expects those agents to pull deposits from banks paying uncompetitive rates, and the basket is built to collect that flow.
The Investor · Invest desk

What happened
- Citrini sees two outcomes as agents start moving money: incumbent banks adapt to software-driven flows, or new financial networks emerge to carry them.
- Its turning point was March's Iran crisis, when Hyperliquid let traders trade oil futures over a weekend while regular exchanges were closed.
- Robinhood's Stock Tokens product added tokenized shares that can be transferred between applications.
- Cryptopolitan names Hyperliquid, Robinhood and Solana as the platforms expanding trading and tokenized financial assets.
Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
- decision Anyone following the basket gives up Bitcoin's price moves entirely and holds only businesses that process transactions, so returns depend on how much money actually moves through them.
- constraint Of Citrini's own two outcomes, only one pays the basket; if banks adapt first, agent-driven deposits move between banks and the onchain names see little of them.
- contradiction The evidence Citrini cites is human traders using weekend oil futures and tokenized stocks, while the payoff it describes needs software agents moving deposits.
Cryptopolitan, which reported the basket, wrote that the reason for leaving Bitcoin out "is more interesting than another argument about whether the world's largest cryptocurrency is overpriced" [12]. Citrini's case is about flow. If AI changes how money moves, the exposure belongs with the companies that process the transactions [4]. A coin sitting in a wallet earns nothing when an agent moves a customer's savings from one bank to another. The venue or chain that clears the transfer does.
"Our financial system was not designed for this future," Citrini wrote. "It's slow, fragmented and gate-kept by layers of intermediaries, legal authorities and KYC processes. It was built by humans, for humans." [6] The firm believes that future is getting closer and that banks are going to hate it [13].
I see three ways this plays out, and the basket wins in one of them. If new networks carry the agent money, the processors in the basket get the volume [7]. If incumbent banks adapt first, deposits still leave the laggards, but they land at other banks. The onchain names then keep the business they already had. If agents never move money at any real scale, the basket is a set of trading venues valued on a payments thesis that never showed up.
Citrini's case for the second outcome rests on history and on two recent products. Blockchains have been able to make payments with no closing time for about 15 years, and what they lacked was enough good reasons for people to use them [1]. "Both of those things are now changing. Financial assets are being tokenized and brought onchain. The worlds of traditional finance and crypto are merging," Citrini wrote [2]. The weekend oil futures on Hyperliquid and Robinhood's transferable stock tokens are the examples it gives [8] [9].
The research began at retail size. "So I downloaded Coinbase Wallet, loaded up $1,000 and went where very few investors return from with a positive ROI: the onchain trenches," Citrini wrote [10]. Cryptopolitan's account does not give the basket's weights or say how much money tracks it.
I think leaving out Bitcoin is the consistent choice for a bet on transaction flow [4]. The counter-thesis is Citrini's own first outcome: banks adapt fast enough to keep agent money inside regulated accounts [7]. One part of the evidence is easy to test. Hyperliquid had its opening in March because regular exchanges were closed that weekend [8]. Every hour an incumbent exchange adds to its trading schedule shrinks that opening.
What to watch
- Disclosure of the basket's holdings and weights, showing how much rides on trading venues such as Hyperliquid and Robinhood against chains such as Solana.
- An incumbent bank launching accounts or payment tools that AI agents can operate directly, the first of Citrini's two outcomes.
Clarity's read
What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.
Reality
- Evidence25
- Adoption30
- Hype gap+40
- Incentives70
- Confidence30
Claim ledger
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
- [1]
Blockchain technology has had around 15 years of being able to make payments without a closing time; the issue was making sure there were enough good reasons for people to use them.
ReportedSupportedSource: Cryptopolitan, describing Citrini Research2 sources— create a free account to open themView cited source - [2]
"Both of those things are now changing. Financial assets are being tokenized and brought onchain. The worlds of traditional finance and crypto are merging."
ReportedSupportedSource: Citrini Research, quoted by Cryptopolitan2 sources— create a free account to open themView cited source - [3]
Citrini Research left Bitcoin out of its crypto investment strategy, focusing instead on blockchain infrastructure.
- [4]
Citrini is banking on the idea that AI can revolutionize the flow of money and thus needs exposure to companies that process these transactions.
- [5]
Citrini's concern is that financial institutions could struggle when millions of automated assistants start moving customer money continuously, potentially draining deposits from banks offering uncompetitive rates.
- [6]
"Our financial system was not designed for this future. It's slow, fragmented and gate-kept by layers of intermediaries, legal authorities and KYC processes. It was built by humans, for humans."
- [7]
Two things may happen: current banks innovate to allow more fluid movement of software money, or new finance networks emerge for this task.
- [8]
The turning point Citrini referred to came in March during the Iran crisis, when traders needed somewhere to respond to oil-market developments over the weekend; Hyperliquid offered trading of oil-based futures contracts when regular exchanges were not operating.
- [9]
Robinhood launched its Stock Tokens product, and these tokenized assets can be transferred between applications.
- [10]
"So I downloaded Coinbase Wallet, loaded up $1,000 and went where very few investors return from with a positive ROI: the onchain trenches."
- [11]
Hyperliquid, Robinhood and Solana are helping expand trading and tokenized financial assets.
- [12]
Bitcoin is sitting out Citrini Research's latest crypto investment play, and the reason "is more interesting than another argument about whether the world's largest cryptocurrency is overpriced."
- [13]
Citrini believes that this future is coming closer, and the banks are going to hate it.
Sources
1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.
Topics and entities
Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.
Topics
- Crypto investment strategyFollow
- Agentic paymentsFollow
- Tokenized assetsFollow