Skip to content

Science Not yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher 2 min read Published

CEA physicists find a third superionic ice phase in a diamond anvil cell

CEA physicists formed hexagonal close-packed superionic ice from ultrapure water at 130-200 GPa and above 1800 K. The team says the finding gives a rationale for adding the phase to models of Uranus and Neptune, though confirming it exists inside either planet is the next step.

The Scientist · Science desk

Send a correction

Illustration accompanying CEA physicists find a third superionic ice phase in a diamond anvil cell
Generated illustration
The hcp ice formed within the pressures tested Pressures in the CEA diamond anvil cell: the range applied to ultrapure water, where the hcp phase was seen, and where Forestier says it is more stable.

Key figures: the team applied pressures up to 229 GPa, starting from 80 GPa. CEA researchers saw the hcp superionic phase from 130 GPa, across 130-200 GPa. Forestier says it becomes more stable above 150-200 GPa.

The hcp ice formed within the pressures tested
FigureValueNoteClaim
Highest pressure applied to ultrapure water229 GPaapplied from 80 GPa7
hcp phase seen, low end of range130 GParange 130–200 GPa, per CEA researchers9
hcp more stable above, per Forestier150 GPaForestier: above 150–200 GPa3

What happened

  • The team, led by Alexis Forestier and Gunnar Weck, added two cup-shaped boron-doped diamond discs to the anvil surfaces and laser-heated a 12 micron sample.
  • They took the water from 300 to 2630 K at pressures between 80 and 229 GPa.
  • A sub-micron X-ray beam at the ID27 beamline in Grenoble produced high-quality diffraction spectra despite the sample's small size.
  • The phase is the third known superionic form of water, after the body-centred cubic phase first observed in 2016.

Why it matters

  • Who has to decide decision Teams modelling Uranus and Neptune have to decide whether to add a third superionic phase to their interiors before its boundaries are mapped.
  • What it limits constraint Superionic behaviour in the new phase is so far inferred from thermal expansion, which limits how confidently its conductivity can be fed into magnetic field models.
  • What it limits constraint The sample was ultrapure water, while the ice hypothesised to generate the planets' fields is described as water, ammonia and methane, so the match to the planets is partial.

The structural result is the firmer half. According to the CEA researchers, the diffraction spectra showed the hcp phase emerging alongside the fcc phase across 130 to 200 GPa, at temperatures above 1800 K [9]. That makes the heating design relevant. The set-up heats the sample uniformly, which avoids the large temperature gradients that complicate measurements in conventional diamond anvil cells [6]. A two-phase pattern is easier to trust when the sample is not hot in one place and cool in another. The work is reported in Physical Review Letters [11].

The superionic half is a claim about hydrogen. The team describes liquid-like hydrogen diffusing through a solid lattice of oxygen atoms [4]. In theory, protons in this kind of ice move so readily through empty sites in the oxygen lattice that conductivity may exceed 100 Siemens per centimetre, almost the level of a metal [12]. That conductivity is what the planetary argument needs. The magnetic fields of Uranus and Neptune are skewed and off-centre with respect to the planets' axes of rotation, and scientists have hypothesised that conductive superionic ice in the outer third of each planet generates them, instead of molten iron in the core as on Earth [1].

Forestier framed the result with care. "The experimental observation of this new hcp superionic phase now provides a rationale for incorporating its mechanical properties and ionic conductivity into these models of planetary interiors," he said [2]. He added that the phase can coexist with the fcc phase and becomes more stable above 150 to 200 GPa, so it probably exists deeper within the inner shell of the ice giants [3].

In our view, calling this experimental support for the planetary models claims too much. It supplies a candidate phase to them. The thing this doesn't tell you is how much of either planet sits inside the 130 to 200 GPa window where the phase appears; the report does not include planetary pressure and temperature profiles [9].

What to watch

  • Brillouin spectroscopy results: anomalies in the speed of sound would be the more direct superionic signature Weck says the team wants.
  • The CEA team's map of stable regions, phase transition lines and hcp melting behaviour, which it says will help show whether the phase is present in Uranus and Neptune.
  • Whether published interior models of Uranus and Neptune start including the hcp phase's conductivity and mechanical properties.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence62
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+10
Incentives
Not scored
Confidence50
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    The magnetic fields of Uranus and Neptune are skewed and off-centre with respect to the planets' axis of rotation, and scientists have hypothesised that they arise from conductive superionic warm dense ice (water, ammonia and methane) in the planets' outer third, instead of from molten iron in the core as on Earth.

    Reported Supported Source: Physics World, describing a scientific hypothesis2 sources— create a free account to open themView cited source
  2. [2]

    "The experimental observation of this new hcp superionic phase now provides a rationale for incorporating its mechanical properties and ionic conductivity into these models of planetary interiors," Forestier said.

    Reported Supported Source: Alexis Forestier, CEA2 sources— create a free account to open themView cited source
  3. [3]

    Forestier said the hcp phase can coexist with the fcc superionic phase and become more stable at higher pressures (above 150-200 GPa), and so probably exists deeper within the inner shell of the ice giants.

    Reported Supported Source: Alexis Forestier, CEA2 sources— create a free account to open themView cited source

Get this ledger inside ChatGPT. Ask about any of our stories and the answer brings its figure, each claim’s verdict and the sources. Free, no account.

Add to ChatGPTAdd to Claude

Sources

1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. physicsworld.com

    1 article · October 16, 2026

    New type of superionic water ice observed for the first time

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Topics

Loading related stories