Skip to content

Product2 publishers3 min readPublished

Apple takes 33% of China's phone sales in a week when only Pro iPhone 18s were on sale

Apple took 33% of China's phone sales in the iPhone 18 Pro's launch week, Counterpoint Research says, with the standard iPhone 18 held back. Counterpoint counts that delay as one of three reasons, so the week cannot show how far the stagger alone moved buyers up to the Pro.

The Product Desk · Product desk

Illustration accompanying Apple takes 33% of China's phone sales in a week when only Pro iPhone 18s were on sale
Generated illustration

What happened

  • China's new smartphone sales had fallen 17% year on year since July as costs rose, a slide Counterpoint says the Pro launch reversed.
  • Counterpoint's other two reasons are Apple absorbing part of its higher component costs and heavy advertising and promotion from retailers and carriers.
  • Apple's iPhone Duo goes on sale October 23 in a market MacRumors says wants foldable devices far more than the rest of the world does.

Compiled by The Product DeskSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • decision Teams planning a tiered launch now have a case for shipping the premium tier first, but Counterpoint's own hedging means the choice has to be justified by mix data from after the cheaper model ships.
  • cost Apple paid for part of the Pro's value case by absorbing component cost increases, so a team copying the calendar without a similar price cushion copies only one of the three inputs.
  • constraint Until Counterpoint reports weeks that include the standard iPhone 18, Apple's launch-week lead measures timing as much as mix, and it cannot yet separate converted buyers from early ones.

In the week of September 14, a shopper in China who wanted a new iPhone 18 could choose a Pro or a Pro Max [3][8]. The standard iPhone 18 was not on sale yet, because Apple launched both Pro models well ahead of it [8]. Counterpoint Research thinks some of those shoppers upgraded instead of waiting [8].

What buyers actually did, on Counterpoint's numbers, was this: iPhone 18 Pro sales in the first three days ran 12% above iPhone 17 Pro sales across that model's entire first week last year, MacRumors reported [4]. Those three days were the only Pro sales in Week 38, the week Apple took first place [2][5]. The new phones had three selling days to the old model's seven, 43% of the window, and still came out ahead [1].

The version a product team tells itself is tidier. Hold the cheaper model back, and buyers who would have settled for it pay up for the premium one. Counterpoint lists that as the first of three reasons, and words it carefully: some buyers may have decided to upgrade [8]. The other two reasons would lift the same number with no help from the calendar. Premium phone prices have risen across the market, and buyers have got used to paying more [9]. Apple absorbed some of its higher component costs, so the Pro was comparatively better value [10]. Retailers and carriers also put heavy advertising and promotion behind it, which Counterpoint calls "aggressive channel support" [11].

Each of those produces a strong first week, and only the delay is a product-mix decision. Separating them takes one figure: how many Pro buyers had planned to buy the standard model. The report as published does not include it.

The market claim needs the same care. China's new smartphone sales had fallen 17% year on year since July as costs rose, according to Counterpoint's China Weekly Smartphone Sell-Out Tracker [6]. Counterpoint says the Pro launch reversed that trend [7]. The growth figure it gives is for Apple's Pro line measured against last year's Pro line [4].

Apple runs a version of the test again soon. The iPhone Duo goes on sale October 23, and MacRumors notes that Chinese buyers want foldable devices far more than buyers elsewhere [12].

In my view the Pro-first calendar is worth copying only by a team that also has a price advantage like the one Apple bought by absorbing costs [10]. The tradeoff is a launch window in which the buyer who wanted the cheaper model has nothing new to buy. To check whether a stagger moved mix, take two readings after the cheaper tier ships. One is whether the premium tier's share of unit sales stays above its last-cycle level or falls back to it. The other is whether total units across the whole launch window went up, or the same buyers simply came earlier.

High share with more units means the stagger moved mix and can be repeated. High share with flat units means premium demand came forward, and the next cycle has to replace it. Low share with more units means price and promotion carried the launch. Low share with flat units means the date moved and nothing else did. Apple's China data so far cannot be placed on either axis: it covers three days of Pro sales and no sales of the standard iPhone 18 [5][8].

What to watch

  • Counterpoint's weekly sell-out figures for the first weeks the standard iPhone 18 is on sale in China, and whether the Pro keeps its share of Apple's sales.
  • iPhone Duo sell-through in China after October 23, and whether it adds buyers or splits the Pro's.
  • A Counterpoint figure for China's total smartphone sales in Week 38, to test whether the whole market's 17% slide reversed or only Apple's Pro line grew.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories