Skip to content

Leadership Not yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher 3 min read Published

Acas draft code points everyday misconduct and performance concerns to informal talks first

Acas's draft revised code, published in July 2026, says misconduct and performance concerns are usually best dealt with informally. That leaves the formal-or-informal call with whoever holds the first conversation.

The Board Room · Leadership desk

How we use AI Send a correction

Illustration accompanying Acas draft code points everyday misconduct and performance concerns to informal talks first
Generated illustration

What happened

  • Acas consulted on the draft this summer and is now reviewing the responses it received.
  • The draft keeps a very structured, formal disciplinary process for cases such as gross misconduct.
  • Acas's text argues that addressing an issue early and informally may lead to a quicker resolution that is beneficial for everyone involved.
  • Personnel Today sets the draft beside the case of HM Treasury's Chloe Moffat, who died the day after a May 2025 meeting described to her as informal and fact-finding.

Why it matters

  • decision Each misconduct or performance concern has to be sorted at the first conversation, by the manager or HR adviser present, into informal handling or formal process.
  • exposure Where internal emails already rate an allegation as serious, a meeting labelled informal sits beside that record, as it did at HM Treasury.
  • constraint According to Lawrence Jell, informal must not become shorthand for unrecorded or evidence-light, so an informal route still needs a written trail.

A default of "usually informal" makes the first conversation the point where a case is sorted. Acas says concerns about misconduct and unsatisfactory performance are "usually" "best dealt with informally" [4]. Personnel Today adds the qualifier "at least initially" [4]. Where the line falls between a concern for informal handling and one that needs formal process is a judgement, and the manager or HR adviser in the room makes it first.

Personnel Today asks whether Acas is right to favour informal handling in a process where emotions may be running high and clarity is key, and gives the death of Chloe Moffat as one reason for asking [16]. In the meeting, when Moffat asked whether she was at risk of losing her job, a senior manager told her she "couldn't predict any outcome of any potential investigation" [8]. Assistant coroner Anna Crawford concluded: "HM Treasury materially contributed to Ms Moffat's death by not applying their written discipline policy and procedure in that they did not inform her that the likely penalty, if the allegations were proven, was a written warning and not dismissal." [9]

That finding concerns what the employee was told. In the part Personnel Today quotes, it does not say an informal first step is wrong. The final coroner's report has not been published, and Personnel Today says there is much about the case that is not known [10]. In our view the finding speaks to disclosure: what a manager must tell an employee about the likely outcome, whatever the meeting is called.

Both practitioners Personnel Today quotes accept the direction of travel. Lawrence Jell, who founded Your People Team and is its managing director, thinks Acas is probably right, in broad terms, to steer employers away from formalising every workplace problem [11]. He says early resolution can preserve working relationships, reduce cost and stop relatively modest disputes becoming entrenched [11]. His condition is on the record: "Acas says that you should try and prioritise informal first in this new normal. But it doesn't say you should do that to the detriment of formal if it's allegations that should be dealt with in a formal environment," he told Personnel Today [13].

David Liddle, founder of TCM Group, goes further. He argues that HR departments have become increasingly rigid and compliance-driven [14]. Liddle said: "Even the words 'discipline' and 'grievance' are throwbacks to an industrial era of work." [15]

The code published in draft in July 2026 is not final [1]. The source does not say when a final text will appear or whether the wording will change. That leaves this quarter's decision with employers: wait for the final text, or settle now what a manager must tell an employee before any conversation labelled informal. The second option needs nothing from Acas, because the inquest finding turned on a written policy HM Treasury already had [9]. If the final code keeps "usually", the first-conversation sort becomes routine. Jell's warning about unrecorded handling then applies to each case [12].

What to watch

  • Publication of Acas's final code, and whether it keeps the word 'usually' and the gross misconduct carve-out.
  • The final coroner's report into Chloe Moffat's death, which Personnel Today says has not been published.
  • Whether the final text adds wording on recording informal conversations or telling employees the likely outcome.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence50
Adoption
Insufficient
Hype gap
Insufficient
Incentives55
Confidence55
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    The new, revised draft Acas Code of Practice on disciplinary and grievance procedures was published in July 2026.

    Reported Supported Source: Personnel TodayView cited source
  2. [2]

    Acas consulted on the proposed code this summer and is now in the process of reviewing responses.

    Reported Supported Source: Personnel TodayView cited source
  3. [3]

    The proposed code makes clear that in some instances, like gross misconduct, following a very structured, formal disciplinary process will still be the right way to go.

    Reported Supported Source: Personnel TodayView cited source

Get this ledger inside ChatGPT. Ask about any of our stories and the answer brings its figure, each claim’s verdict and the sources. Free, no account.

Add to ChatGPTAdd to Claude

Sources

1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. personneltoday.com

    1 article · October 14, 2026

    Formal or informal? Tension at the heart of discipline and grievance

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Topics

  • Workplace dispute resolutionFollow
  • HR practiceFollow
  • Disciplinary and grievance proceduresFollow
Loading related stories