Skip to content

Build Independently confirmed2 publishers 3 min read Published Updated

AFP charges two Perth men over poisoned packages police say reached 1000 organisations

Police allege a small number of trusted components carried the compromise into more than 1000 organisations, and the charge sheet puts the heaviest sentencing exposure on the money laundering count, well above anything tied to the code itself.

The Engineer · Build desk

How we use AI Send a correction

Photograph accompanying AFP charges two Perth men over poisoned packages police say reached 1000 organisations
Photo: afp.gov.au

What happened

  • The AFP charged two Western Australian men on 26 August 2026 with 14 offences between them, after search warrants in Perth executed with the state police force and assistance from the FBI.
  • The case opened in April 2026, when the AFP and FBI received information from multiple cyber threat assessment companies about code allegedly inserted into software hosted on an open-source repository.
  • Investigators say they have already extracted 100 terabytes of data from devices seized at a single address, and expect to extract considerably more.

Why it matters

  • cost On the lowest reading of the AFP's remediation estimate, the cleanup runs to roughly $200,000 per affected organisation, and the downstream victim absorbs every dollar of it while the accused bear none of the cost.
  • constraint With no repository, ecosystem or package names published and a trial possibly more than 18 months out, a team cannot check its own exposure against this case; defensive work has to be indicator-independent.
  • exposure Marshall confirmed some victims are Australian but could not say how many organisations or countries are implicated, so an unknown number of the counted victims have not been told they are in the tally.
  • precedent Charging package poisoning under the identity crime provision alongside a proceeds of crime count sets a template for building the next such case on credential theft and crypto tracing evidence, extending well beyond intrusion evidence alone.

The load-bearing phrase in the AFP release is "a small number of trusted software components" [7]. That is the whole mechanism. A poisoned release does not need to be popular to be everywhere; it needs to be resolved. Once it is in a lockfile or somewhere in a transitive closure, install-time and build-time code runs wherever the package is fetched, which in most shops is a CI agent holding registry tokens, cloud role credentials and signing material. The alleged haul matches that environment: user credentials and authentication materials [5]. AFP Commander Graeme Marshall described the second stage as impersonating legitimate users, bypassing security controls and reaching networks and cloud environments [10]. Stolen tokens are valid tokens.

Treat the impact figures as claims about someone else's telemetry. Police estimate more than 1000 organisations potentially compromised, more than 500,000 credentials taken and at least 300 gigabytes exfiltrated [6]. Divide it out and the average victim lost roughly 500 credentials [22] and about 300 megabytes [23]. That average is almost certainly not the shape of the distribution; a few build systems with wide reach would account for most of both totals. The qualifiers matter too, since "potentially" sits on the organisation count and "at least" sits on the bytes [6]. The ABC's own summary says hundreds of organisations while its body carries the police figure of more than 1000 [13]. For 1000 to mean 1000 intrusions rather than 1000 installs of a bad version, someone would have to publish per-organisation confirmation.

The charge sheet is the more useful document. Against the 21-year-old from Cottesloe: possessing data with intent, maximum three years; four counts of unauthorised modification of data with intent to commit a serious offence, five years; supplying data with intent, three years; failing to comply with a 3LA assistance order, ten years; and dealing with proceeds of crime worth $100,000 or more, twenty years [15]. The proceeds count carries four times the maximum of the heaviest computer offence charged, and the assistance-order count twice it [25]. On the face of that arithmetic, keeping the password is dearer than modifying the data. The 23-year-old from Mandurah faces the six computer counts and nothing further [16]. Police allege both men were principal participants paid in cryptocurrency, with the value still under investigation [8].

Scale shows up in the evidence pile rather than the theft. Investigators say they have already extracted 100 terabytes from devices seized at one address and expect much more [11], which is on the order of 330 times the exfiltration figure they have put on the syndicate [21]. The magistrate refused Ruben Thomson bail on the concern that he could tamper with evidence, and his lawyer withdrew the application [19]. Ruben Ian Thomson, 21, and Louis Michael Gaebler, 23, were named by the ABC [17], and the FBI's Assistant Law Enforcement Attache Dave Andish identified Thomson as the alleged leader of the group known as TeamPCP [9]. What that adds up to, from a defender's seat, is a case whose critical path runs through forensic extraction, with attribution trailing well behind it.

What to watch

  • Whether anyone publishes the repository, package names and affected version ranges: the AFP, the FBI, or the threat assessment companies whose information opened the case.
  • Gaebler's 18 September appearance, and whether the further charges the prosecutor flagged are actually laid.
  • Whether later forensic passes over the seized devices revise the 300 gigabyte and 500,000 credential estimates.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence58
Adoption41
Hype gap+26
Incentives72
Confidence63
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    The AFP charged two Western Australian men on 26 August 2026 with a combined total of 14 offences, after executing search warrants in Perth with the Western Australia Police Force and assistance from the FBI.

  2. [2]

    Both men were scheduled to appear in Perth Magistrates Court on 27 August 2026.

  3. [3]

    Search warrants were executed at properties in Cottesloe, Hamilton Hill and Mandurah; both men were arrested and electronic devices and other items were seized for forensic analysis.

Sources

2 independent publishers whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. abc.net.au

    1 article · August 27, 2026

    Two Perth hackers charged after major AFP, FBI investigation into alleged global cybercrime - ABC News
  2. afp.gov.au

    1 article · August 28, 2026

    Two WA men charged following AFP-FBI-WAPF disruption of alleged global cybercrime syndicate

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Topics

Entities

Loading related stories