Skip to content

Leadership1 publisher3 min readPublished

Two imprint closures in one year turn middle grade into a category you manage down

A decade of falling sales for books aimed at 8- to 12-year-olds has stopped looking cyclical. The two competing explanations point to very different remedies.

The Board Room · Leadership desk

Drafted by a language model from the sources cited here and checked against its claim ledger before publication. How we use AISend a correction

What happened

  • In the years since the pandemic, publishers have shut down multiple middle-grade imprints, culminating in it happening twice this year.
  • Middle grade refers to books for kids ages 8 to 12.
  • For the past 10 years, middle-grade books have been selling less and less.
  • Before about age 9, most kids say they read for fun at least five days a week.
  • After their ninth birthday, only 35 percent of kids still say they read for fun at least five days a week.

Compiled by The Board RoomSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

Publishers have shut down multiple middle-grade imprints since the pandemic, and it happened twice this year, according to Vox's account of a category that has been selling less and less for the past ten years [1][2][3]. Closing an imprint is not a marketing adjustment; it is a decision to reduce capacity, which means the people running these lists have stopped treating the decline as weather.

The demand picture is unusually well defined for a consumer category. Most children under nine say they read for fun at least five days a week; after their ninth birthday, 35 percent still do [4][5]. The industry calls this the decline by 9 [6]. Middle grade covers ages 8 to 12, so the entire category sits on the wrong side of that cliff [2]. Joanne O'Sullivan, a children's book author and Publishers Weekly reporter, told Vox the sales slide "had been happening for maybe a decade, very very slowly," then got dramatically worse in 2020 [7][8].

Two theories are on the table, and they are not equally actionable. The first says the readers changed: children distracted by iPads and YouTube shorts never built the stamina for a printed page, with reading scores that began falling in 2014 as the evidence [9][10]. That is roughly six years before the 2020 inflection, which makes it a slow-moving input rather than a shock [11]. Vox also reports the argument that overscheduled children no longer have free time for pleasure reading, and that the pandemic broke the middle-grade discovery chain [12].

The second theory says publishers changed. Average middle-grade page counts went from 174.5 in 2006 to 290 in 2016, an increase of about 66 percent in a decade [13][14]. Vicky Weber, an author, literary agent, and middle-grade author coach, wrote in April that the first Harry Potter ran 76,944 words, already at the edge of the audience's attention, and that Order of the Phoenix ran 257,045 [15][16][17]. A pre-Harry benchmark, The Baby-Sitters Club volume The Truth About Stacey, was around 35,000 words [18]. Order of the Phoenix is therefore roughly seven times that book and more than three times the first Potter [19][20]. On this reading, the category shipped a product its buyers could not consume.

Practitioners describe the failure at the point of selection. O'Sullivan calls the move from leveled readers and short chapter books to "chunkier, more challenging" novels abrupt, and says it hits capable readers too, not only strugglers [21][22]. Kelly Dickinson, a middle school librarian in Bethesda, Maryland, told Vox that unconfident readers "stall out before they can even pick one" because a long book looks impossible [23]. That is a conversion problem, and conversion problems respond to specification changes.

Which is what publishers are now attempting: short, funny books loaded with graphics, with Dog Man as the working template for the middle-grade novel of the future [24][25].

What to watch. First, whether the imprint count keeps falling; Vox's reporting does not name the imprints or their owners, so the useful signal is the next closure or consolidation announcement and whether it comes with a list rationale [26]. Second, whether acquisitions actually get shorter, because the page-count series is the one measurable thing a publisher controls and the 2006 to 2016 climb took a decade to build [13]. Third, whether the discovery chain that broke in 2020 gets rebuilt through schools and libraries, since that is where the stall-out happens [12][23]. Fourth, reading scores: if they are the cause rather than a correlate, shorter funnier books will move units without moving the underlying trend that began in 2014 [10].

Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories