Skip to content

InvestNot yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher2 min readPublished

SWI pays about $500,000 per attributable megawatt for FTX's old bitcoin-mining grid connections

SWI Group paid $500 million for about 77% of Genesis Digital Assets, which controls 1.3 GW of grid connections across 15 sites. That works out to about $500,000 per attributable megawatt, paid ahead of the AI conversion SWI plans.

The Investor · Invest desk

How we use AISend a correction

Illustration accompanying SWI pays about $500,000 per attributable megawatt for FTX's old bitcoin-mining grid connections
Generated illustration
SWI's GDA stake lifts the group's AI-ready capacity Purchase price, GDA's grid connections, SWI's combined AI-ready capacity and implied full value of GDA; the implied value assumes pro-rata pricing.

Four figures: SWI paid $500 million for about 77% of Genesis Digital Assets; GDA controls 1.3 GW of energized and approved grid connections across 15 facilities; with GDA folded in, SWI's combined AI-ready capacity reaches 3.6 GW; priced pro rata, 100% of GDA implies about $649 million.

SWI's GDA stake lifts the group's AI-ready capacity
FigureValueNoteClaim
Paid for ~77% of GDA500 $ million1
GDA grid connections, 15 sites1.3 GW3
SWI group AI-ready capacity, total3.6 GW5
Implied value of 100% of GDA649 $ millionAbout, if priced pro rata13

What happened

  • SWI took its stake through a series of preferred shares instead of buying common equity outright.
  • With Genesis Digital Assets folded into SWI's existing portfolio, the group says its AI-ready capacity reaches 3.6 GW.
  • A lawsuit against Genesis Digital Assets was dismissed in mid-June 2026, in the same window as the June 15 close.

Why it matters

  • cost At about $500,000 per attributable megawatt, the purchase price is only the first bill: each site still has to be rebuilt for AI loads, and that spending comes on top.
  • constraint Mining rigs tolerate interruptions far better than AI clusters, so the sites typically need heavier cooling, networking and uptime guarantees before an AI tenant can use them.
  • contradiction GDA's 1.3 GW is 36% of the 3.6 GW SWI calls AI-ready, yet Crypto Briefing describes that 1.3 GW as potential, not finished AI capacity.
  • exposure Most of the 15 sites are in Texas, so SWI's grid risk concentrates in one market, and the Swedish sites diversify only a minority of the footprint.

Spread the price across the power and it comes to about $500,000 a megawatt (or rather, per attributable megawatt, since some of the company is not SWI's). SWI paid $500 million for roughly 77% of Genesis Digital Assets [1]. Grossed up, that values the whole company at about $649 million [13]. The 1.3 GW of connections [3] is 1,300 MW, 77% of that is about 1,001 MW, and $500 million over 1,001 MW is $499,500 a megawatt [14]. The figure holds only if the preferred shares [2] were priced pro rata with common equity.

There are two readings of that price. In the buyer's version, SWI chief executive Max-Hervé George framed the acquisition around one word, connectivity, and described it as a strategic pivot from crypto mining to AI workloads, according to Crypto Briefing [6]. The sites are then worth what an AI developer would pay for power that is already energized and approved [3]. In the other version, the price reflects a seller coming out of a legal freeze. GDA's assets sat in the FTX bankruptcy process for years [7], and Crypto Briefing suggests the dismissal of the lawsuit against GDA cleared the path for a buyer [16]. Some of the $500,000 would then pay for the dismissal as well as the megawatts.

We think the first reading carries more of the price, since the stated plan is to convert the infrastructure for AI and high-performance computing workloads [12]. But that is intent, and a stated plan is not a price comparison. The deal summary did not include a price for a mining-only site, so nothing in the report shows that $500,000 a megawatt beats what a miner would pay for the same interconnect.

We would be wrong if GDA's mining cash flows cover most of the $649 million on their own, or if SWI leaves most of the sites mining after the conversion it has announced.

What to watch

  • Whether SWI discloses a conversion budget or a first AI tenant for the GDA sites, which would turn $500,000 a megawatt into an all-in figure.
  • The governance and control terms attached to the preferred shares, since the deal summary did not detail them.
  • Any sale of an energized mining-only site at a stated price, which would give the missing comparison for the $500,000.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence35
Adoption
Insufficient
Hype gap+25
Incentives
Insufficient
Confidence40
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    SWI Group acquired approximately 77% economic interest in Genesis Digital Assets (GDA) for $500 million.

  2. [2]

    SWI secured its stake through a series of preferred shares rather than a straight purchase of common equity.

  3. [3]

    GDA controls 1.3 gigawatts of energized and approved grid connections spread across 15 facilities.

    ReportedSupportedView cited source

Sources

1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. cryptobriefing.com

    1 article · October 11, 2026

    FTX’s old Bitcoin-mining infrastructure gets a second life powering AI

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Topics

Entities

Loading related stories