Skip to content

ScienceNot yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher3 min readPublished

Random mass-loss kicks from the dying Sun eject a giant planet in nine of ten simulations

Caltech and Michigan theorists find a dying Sun shedding mass in 4,600 random kicks unravels the giant planets' orbits within 10 billion years in 90% of runs. It is a simulation result built on kick sizes inferred from Gaia binaries, and the reported figures do not cleanly support the hundredfold speed-up over the old estimate.

The Scientist · Science desk

How we use AISend a correction

Photograph accompanying Random mass-loss kicks from the dying Sun eject a giant planet in nine of ten simulations
Photo: aasnova.org

What happened

  • The older 100-billion-year stability estimate assumed the Sun would shed about half its mass smoothly as it becomes a white dwarf, some six billion years from now.
  • The researchers inferred the kicks from Gaia observations of wide binary star systems that include white dwarfs.
  • By the time the Sun is a white dwarf, 40 percent of projections leave the outer system in disarray, with Uranus and Neptune able to swap places or move inside Jupiter's orbit.

Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • contradiction Measured from today, the reported timescales support a speed-up of about tenfold, so the hundredfold figure depends on a baseline the coverage does not spell out.
  • constraint The odds from the 48 realistic runs hold only for the kick strength inferred from Gaia's white-dwarf binaries, and a different reading of those binaries could shift them.
  • precedent Stability results for planets around other dying stars that assume smooth mass loss now have to be rechecked with mass leaving in discrete ejections.
  • capability Microlensing counts of free-floating planets give an independent check on whether dying stars eject giant planets as often as these runs suggest.

The new model keeps the Sun's total mass loss close to the figure the older calculation used. In the work Konstantin Batygin and Jim Fuller of Caltech and Fred Adams of the University of Michigan published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters [1], each of 4,600 ejections carries off about a ten-thousandth of the Sun's mass, roughly 33 Earths [6][7]. Multiplied out, the kicks remove 0.46 of the Sun's mass [17], close to the "about half" assumed by the calculation that gave the outer planets 100 billion undisturbed years [3][2].

So the comparison changes one thing: how the mass leaves. Each ejection shifts the Sun slightly and alters its pull on every planet [4]. Symmetric bursts might cancel out. Random ones leave small offsets that add up to large disturbances in the outer orbits [4]. Per kick, the Sun's speed changes by about 7 metres per second [7]. "The surprise is what happens when smoothness gives way to granularity: break the mass loss into discrete ejection events and the picture changes wholesale," Batygin told ScienceAlert [16].

The kick size was not picked freely. The team inferred kicks from Gaia observations of wide binaries containing white dwarfs [5], then ran almost 700 simulations at several kick levels, concentrating on the 48 with the most realistic mass loss [8]. In 37 of those 48, about 77 percent, the outer planets began crossing each other's orbits before the Sun had finished shedding its outer layers [9][18]. The earliest crossing came after only about 10 percent of the mass had gone [10]. Saturn may be ejected within a few million years in some runs [12].

"We lose them. In nine out of ten of our simulations, at least one giant planet is hurled into interstellar space," Batygin said [13]. According to ScienceAlert, in 90 percent of the models the system comes apart within three billion years of the Sun becoming a white dwarf, which puts the end less than 10 billion years from now [15].

ScienceAlert describes this as disruption 100 times faster than previously estimated [19]. I'd treat that number with caution. Measured from today, 100 billion years against under 10 billion is a factor of about 10 [20]. The report gives the 90 percent figure for "the models" without saying whether that means the 48 realistic runs or all of the nearly 700, and it does not show how the factor of 100 was reached.

The thing this doesn't tell you is what the Sun itself will do. These are simulations, and the kick strength in them comes from white-dwarf binaries around other stars [5][8]. A different reading of those binaries would mean a different input to the runs. Batygin said the result "dovetails with microlensing surveys, which suggest there may be as many free-floating planets in the galaxy as there are stars," and that dying suns "are plausibly a major source" [14].

What to watch

  • The paper's own definition of the hundredfold speed-up, and whether its baseline differs from the 100-billion-years-from-today comparison.
  • Results from the roughly 650 runs at other kick strengths, which would show how sensitive the instability rate is to the size of each kick.
  • Independent analyses of Gaia wide binaries containing white dwarfs that confirm or revise kicks of about 7 metres per second.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence45
Adoption
Insufficient
Hype gap+35
Incentives
Insufficient
Confidence40
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    Theoretical astrophysicists Konstantin Batygin and Jim Fuller of Caltech and Fred Adams of the University of Michigan, publishing in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, found evidence that the Sun's mass loss will be turbulent and random, ejected in thousands of individual kicks.

    ReportedSupportedView cited source
  2. [2]

    Even considering the Sun's evolution and stars passing through from space, the outer planets were believed able to remain undisturbed for 100 billion years.

    ReportedSupportedView cited source
  3. [3]

    The 100-billion-year estimate assumed the dying Sun, about six billion years from now, would shed about half its mass as it slowly becomes a white dwarf.

    ReportedSupportedView cited source

Sources

1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. sciencealert.com

    1 article · October 9, 2026

    Our Solar System May Be Destroyed 100 Times Faster Than We Thought

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Topics

Loading related stories