ScienceNot yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher3 min readPublished
Random mass-loss kicks from the dying Sun eject a giant planet in nine of ten simulations
Caltech and Michigan theorists find a dying Sun shedding mass in 4,600 random kicks unravels the giant planets' orbits within 10 billion years in 90% of runs. It is a simulation result built on kick sizes inferred from Gaia binaries, and the reported figures do not cleanly support the hundredfold speed-up over the old estimate.
The Scientist · Science desk

What happened
- The older 100-billion-year stability estimate assumed the Sun would shed about half its mass smoothly as it becomes a white dwarf, some six billion years from now.
- The researchers inferred the kicks from Gaia observations of wide binary star systems that include white dwarfs.
- By the time the Sun is a white dwarf, 40 percent of projections leave the outer system in disarray, with Uranus and Neptune able to swap places or move inside Jupiter's orbit.
Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
- contradiction Measured from today, the reported timescales support a speed-up of about tenfold, so the hundredfold figure depends on a baseline the coverage does not spell out.
- constraint The odds from the 48 realistic runs hold only for the kick strength inferred from Gaia's white-dwarf binaries, and a different reading of those binaries could shift them.
- precedent Stability results for planets around other dying stars that assume smooth mass loss now have to be rechecked with mass leaving in discrete ejections.
- capability Microlensing counts of free-floating planets give an independent check on whether dying stars eject giant planets as often as these runs suggest.
The new model keeps the Sun's total mass loss close to the figure the older calculation used. In the work Konstantin Batygin and Jim Fuller of Caltech and Fred Adams of the University of Michigan published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters [1], each of 4,600 ejections carries off about a ten-thousandth of the Sun's mass, roughly 33 Earths [6][7]. Multiplied out, the kicks remove 0.46 of the Sun's mass [17], close to the "about half" assumed by the calculation that gave the outer planets 100 billion undisturbed years [3][2].
So the comparison changes one thing: how the mass leaves. Each ejection shifts the Sun slightly and alters its pull on every planet [4]. Symmetric bursts might cancel out. Random ones leave small offsets that add up to large disturbances in the outer orbits [4]. Per kick, the Sun's speed changes by about 7 metres per second [7]. "The surprise is what happens when smoothness gives way to granularity: break the mass loss into discrete ejection events and the picture changes wholesale," Batygin told ScienceAlert [16].
The kick size was not picked freely. The team inferred kicks from Gaia observations of wide binaries containing white dwarfs [5], then ran almost 700 simulations at several kick levels, concentrating on the 48 with the most realistic mass loss [8]. In 37 of those 48, about 77 percent, the outer planets began crossing each other's orbits before the Sun had finished shedding its outer layers [9][18]. The earliest crossing came after only about 10 percent of the mass had gone [10]. Saturn may be ejected within a few million years in some runs [12].
"We lose them. In nine out of ten of our simulations, at least one giant planet is hurled into interstellar space," Batygin said [13]. According to ScienceAlert, in 90 percent of the models the system comes apart within three billion years of the Sun becoming a white dwarf, which puts the end less than 10 billion years from now [15].
ScienceAlert describes this as disruption 100 times faster than previously estimated [19]. I'd treat that number with caution. Measured from today, 100 billion years against under 10 billion is a factor of about 10 [20]. The report gives the 90 percent figure for "the models" without saying whether that means the 48 realistic runs or all of the nearly 700, and it does not show how the factor of 100 was reached.
The thing this doesn't tell you is what the Sun itself will do. These are simulations, and the kick strength in them comes from white-dwarf binaries around other stars [5][8]. A different reading of those binaries would mean a different input to the runs. Batygin said the result "dovetails with microlensing surveys, which suggest there may be as many free-floating planets in the galaxy as there are stars," and that dying suns "are plausibly a major source" [14].
What to watch
- The paper's own definition of the hundredfold speed-up, and whether its baseline differs from the 100-billion-years-from-today comparison.
- Results from the roughly 650 runs at other kick strengths, which would show how sensitive the instability rate is to the size of each kick.
- Independent analyses of Gaia wide binaries containing white dwarfs that confirm or revise kicks of about 7 metres per second.
Clarity's read
What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.
Reality
- Evidence45
- Adoption
- Insufficient
- Hype gap+35
- Incentives
- Insufficient
- Confidence40
Claim ledger
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
- [1]
Theoretical astrophysicists Konstantin Batygin and Jim Fuller of Caltech and Fred Adams of the University of Michigan, publishing in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, found evidence that the Sun's mass loss will be turbulent and random, ejected in thousands of individual kicks.
- [2]
Even considering the Sun's evolution and stars passing through from space, the outer planets were believed able to remain undisturbed for 100 billion years.
- [3]
The 100-billion-year estimate assumed the dying Sun, about six billion years from now, would shed about half its mass as it slowly becomes a white dwarf.
- [4]
Each ejection pushes the Sun into a slightly different position, changing its gravitational influence on every planet; symmetric bursts might average out, but random ones produce tiny changes that add up to large shake-ups in the outer Solar System.
- [5]
The researchers found evidence of mass-loss kicks in data from ESA's Gaia observatory on wide stellar binary systems that included white dwarfs.
- [6]
Each kick may eject one ten-thousandth of the Sun's mass, about 33 Earth masses.
- [7]
The mass loss occurs across 4,600 ejection events, each changing the Sun's speed by about seven meters per second.
- [8]
Of almost 700 simulations at several levels of mass-loss kicks, the primary focus is on 48 that included the most realistic mass loss during the Sun's dying stages.
- [9]
In 37 of the 48 realistic scenarios, the outer planets start crossing each other's orbits early, before the Sun has finished losing its outer layers.
- [10]
In the earliest scenarios, the outer planets are already crossing orbits when the Sun has lost only about 10 percent of its mass.
- [11]
By the time the Sun has become a white dwarf, the outer Solar System is in disarray in 40 percent of the projections; Uranus and Neptune may swap positions and even move within Jupiter's orbit.
- [12]
Saturn may be ejected within a few million years, becoming a rogue planet.
- [13]
"We lose them. In nine out of ten of our simulations, at least one giant planet is hurled into interstellar space," Batygin told ScienceAlert.
- [14]
Batygin told ScienceAlert: "This dovetails with microlensing surveys, which suggest there may be as many free-floating planets in the galaxy as there are stars - dying suns are plausibly a major source."
- [15]
In 90 percent of the models, the Solar System self-destructs within three billion years after the Sun becomes a white dwarf, so less than 10 billion years from now.
- [16]
"The surprise is what happens when smoothness gives way to granularity: break the mass loss into discrete ejection events and the picture changes wholesale," Batygin told ScienceAlert.
- [17]
4,600 kicks of one ten-thousandth of the Sun's mass each remove a total of about 0.46 of the Sun's mass, consistent with the 'about half' assumed in earlier work.
- [18]
37 of 48 realistic scenarios is about 77 percent.
- [19]
ScienceAlert reports the Solar System may be disrupted 100 times faster than previously estimated.
- [20]
Comparing the old 100-billion-year estimate with the new 'less than 10 billion years from now' gives a factor of about 10, measured from today.
Sources
1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.
- sciencealert.comOur Solar System May Be Destroyed 100 Times Faster Than We Thought
1 article · October 9, 2026
Topics and entities
Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.