Skip to content

Science Not yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher 2 min read Published

Share of US women and men short on iodine about doubled between 2001-02 and 2017-18

Journal of Nutrition researchers report that 24% of US women and 30% of men aged 14 and up fell short on iodine in 2017-18, about twice the 2001-02 share. Nearly half of pregnant women fell short too, in what Science News calls an estimated, short-term look at population levels.

The Scientist · Science desk

How we use AI Send a correction

Illustration accompanying Share of US women and men short on iodine about doubled between 2001-02 and 2017-18
Generated illustration
More men than women fell short on iodine Share of men and women aged 14 and older not getting an adequate amount of iodine in 2017 and 2018, per a Journal of Nutrition study.

Bar comparison: 30 percent of men and 24 percent of women aged 14 and older were not getting an adequate amount of iodine in 2017 and 2018.

Share aged 14 and older not getting enough iodine, 2017 and 2018

More men than women fell short on iodine (Share aged 14 and older not getting enough iodine, 2017 and 2018)
ItemValueClaim
Men, aged 14 and older30%1
Women, aged 14 and older24%1

What happened

  • The CDC's 2026 Nutrition Report states that women of reproductive age are, at the population level, on the cusp of mild iodine deficiency.
  • Companies introduced iodized salt in Michigan in spring 1924, and Morton Salt was selling it nationwide by that fall.
  • Goiter occurrence had dropped precipitously by the 1950s.

Why it matters

  • Who's exposed exposure If the downward trend continues, Science News says, the eventual cost could be more goiters and harm to children's brain development.
  • What it limits constraint Iodization was never a federal mandate and began with a Michigan medical society's recommendation, so there is no standing rule to tighten if intake keeps falling.
  • What it limits constraint The two survey periods leave out the years between, so the data cannot say when the rise began or whether it is still under way.

Science News gives the earlier comparison only as a rough doubling [2]. Taken at face value, that puts the 2001-02 shares near 12 percent of women and 15 percent of men [15]. The article does not report the earlier figure for pregnant women, or how many pregnant women were in the sample.

The thing this doesn't tell you is how many of those people have any clinical effect. In our view the analysis establishes an intake trend and leaves the health consequence open.

The 30 percent of men below adequate intake in 2017-18 is a share under a nutritional threshold [1]. The goiter counts of a century ago measured something else. In 1918 an examining physician for the World War I draft reported goiters in 30 percent of almost 600 men from one northern Michigan county, some large enough to disqualify them [10]. A 1922 Michigan Department of Health study found goiters in close to 50 percent of schoolchildren in four counties [11].

What iodized salt did on arrival is better documented. A 2017 paper in the Journal of the European Economic Association compared men by birthplace. Among men born in areas without natural iodine sources, World War II Air Force acceptances, based on a qualifying exam, jumped after widespread salt iodization. Among men born where natural sources were adequate, the increase did not occur [12]. The second group is the control. A change in recruiting or testing that applied nationwide would be expected to lift both groups, and an iodine effect predicts a rise in only one.

The clinicians Science News quotes focus on pregnancy. "Even mild degrees of iodine deficiency in pregnancy may be associated with measurably lower IQ in children," said Elizabeth Pearce, an endocrinologist at Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine [13]. The wording is association, and it is about deficiency. The 24 and 30 percent figures count inadequate intake [1].

"People have kind of forgotten this is a risk," said Monica Serrano-Gonzalez, a pediatric endocrinologist affiliated with both Hasbro Children's and the Warren Alpert Medical School at Brown University [14].

What to watch

  • A later survey period would show whether the rise since 2001-02 is continuing or has leveled off.
  • Goiter or thyroid data from low-iodine regions would test whether the intake shortfall has reached health outcomes.
  • The CDC's next population-level reading for women of reproductive age would show whether the group moves past the cusp of mild deficiency.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence62
Adoption
Insufficient
Hype gap−5
Incentives
Insufficient
Confidence55
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    In 2017 and 2018, 24 percent of women and 30 percent of men, aged 14 and older, were not getting an adequate amount of iodine.

    Reported Supported Source: Science News, reporting a 2025 Journal of Nutrition studyView cited source
  2. [2]

    The 2017-18 shares are about twice as many as in 2001 and 2002, researchers reported in the Journal of Nutrition in 2025.

    Reported Supported Source: Science News, reporting researchers in the Journal of Nutrition (2025)View cited source
  3. [3]

    Nearly half of pregnant women have not been getting enough iodine.

    Reported Supported Source: Science NewsView cited source

Get this ledger inside ChatGPT. Ask about any of our stories and the answer brings its figure, each claim’s verdict and the sources. Free, no account.

Add to ChatGPTAdd to Claude

Sources

1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. sciencenews.org

    1 article · October 15, 2026

    Many American diets may not include enough of this essential nutrient

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Topics

Entities

Loading related stories