InvestNot yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher2 min readPublished
Serial $75M token raises are allowed. Each one waits on an SEC staff review
Repeat 12-month raises are permitted, and each buys a fresh offering statement plus years of reports. The SEC's own estimate is roughly 130 offerings a year.
The Investor · Invest desk
What happened
- The SEC proposal pairs a one-time $5 million exemption spread over four years with a larger exemption of up to $75 million in each 12-month period.
- Drew Hinkes of Winston & Strawn reads the rolling 12-month cap as permitting serial $75 million raises, so long as each is genuinely a distinct offering.
- Lilya Tessler of Sidley says every repeat raise needs a new offering statement, an SEC staff review, continuing annual and semiannual reports, and disclosure of the prior year's total.
- The agency's own estimate is around 130 offerings a year under the two exemptions, plus about 475 issuers using the broader investment contract safe harbor.
Why it matters
- cost Disclosure and ongoing reporting turn a token sale into a permanent filing line item, carried in every year the issuer stays on the pathway rather than settled at closing.
- constraint With a staff review sitting in front of each tranche, the cadence of a multi-year funding plan is partly set by the SEC's queue rather than by the engineering schedule.
- exposure Because the investment contract keeps travelling to later buyers until the asset separates from the issuer's promises, what a team says publicly stays legally live in secondary trading.
- contradiction Reiners expects the cap to make first allocations more coveted; Tessler says round-size scarcity long predates the proposal, and which view holds decides whether retail frenzy is a real risk here.
The smaller of the two tracks gets described as a startup ramp and works out to very little. Five million dollars spread across four years averages $1.25 million a year, a sixtieth of what the larger exemption permits inside a single 12-month window [16]. Any team with real capital needs skips it. The arithmetic that matters sits on the bigger track: apply the $75 million ceiling to every offering in the agency's own annual usage estimate and the entire pathway tops out near $9.75 billion of US token issuance a year [15]. That is an upper bound nobody reaches, since the estimate covers both exemptions, but it is the right order of magnitude for a market that once raised comparable sums in weeks.
Cointelegraph's Magazine works through a project wanting $225 million in total, taking it in chunks and returning each time with a more developed network and a higher valuation [6]. Run that way, the issuer produces an annual report, a semiannual report and a new offering statement in every year it raises, so three documents minimum per cycle [17], with a reviewer standing between the plan and the money.
The demand side is throttled too. Non-accredited investors could commit no more than 10% of the greater of their income or net worth, whichever round they join [7]. A first allocation can be made scarce; it cannot be a household's entire balance sheet.
Measured against what exists now, this is still an upgrade. The SEC would replace issuer self-assessment against existing securities law with an explicit route to capital [13], the absence of which cost Tezos and Telegram multimillion-dollar US securities battles [14].
What caps volume is appetite rather than drafting. Up to 90% of projects funded by ICOs between 2017 and 2019 failed [8], and Reiners puts investor appetite, token economics, liquidity, custody and the reputational damage left by the last cycle at the centre of how any fundraising market forms [11]. A legal pathway removes one reason not to raise. It does not manufacture buyers for the next 130 offerings.
What to watch
- How long a staff review of a repeat offering statement actually takes in practice, since that interval sets the real ceiling on serial-raise cadence.
- Whether the final rule aggregates affiliated entities under one 12-month cap or lets related issuers each claim a $75 million window.
- The first dispute over when a crypto asset has separated from an issuer's representations, which decides who carries liability in secondary markets.
Clarity's read
What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.
Reality
- Evidence64
- Adoption
- Insufficient
- Hype gap+8
- Incentives62
- Confidence52
Claim ledger
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
- [1]
The SEC proposal contains a one-time exemption for startups for offerings of up to $5 million over four years, and a larger fundraising exemption allowing up to $75 million in each 12-month period.
- [2]
The $75 million exemption is modeled in part on Regulation A and comes with disclosure and ongoing reporting requirements.
- [3]
Drew Hinkes, partner at Winston & Strawn, told Cointelegraph's Magazine that the 12-month limitation would allow for serial raises of $75 million every 12 months, provided they are actually distinct offerings.
- [4]
Lilya Tessler, partner and leader of Sidley's Global FinTech and Blockchain group, says nothing prevents an issuer from relying on the exemption more than once, but each raise is not automatic.
- [5]
According to Tessler, subsequent raises would require filing a new offering statement and undergoing an SEC staff review, issuers would have to keep filing annual and semiannual reports, and they would have to disclose what was raised under the exemption in the prior 12 months so the cap can be verified.
- [6]
The article gives the example of a project seeking $225 million in total, which could potentially raise the funds in chunks and return to investors later with a more developed network and a higher valuation.
- [7]
Tessler says the SEC's proposal limits non-accredited investors to buying 10% of the greater of their income or net worth, regardless of which round they participate in.
- [8]
Up to 90% of projects funded via ICOs between 2017 and 2019 ended up failing.
- [9]
The SEC estimates that around 130 offerings would use the two new exemptions each year.
- [10]
The SEC estimates around 475 issuers will potentially use the broader investment contract safe harbor.
- [11]
Reiners says fundraising markets are shaped by investor appetite, token economics, liquidity, custody, and the reputational damage left by the last ICO cycle.
- [12]
The SEC's proposal says the investment contract associated with a crypto asset can continue to transfer to subsequent purchasers in secondary market transactions until the crypto asset separates from the issuer's representations or promises.
- [13]
Rather than force issuers to self-evaluate whether their offerings fit within existing securities law frameworks, the SEC is proposing an explicit regulatory pathway for raising capital.
- [14]
Tezos and Telegram fought multimillion-dollar US securities-law battles over token offerings.
- [15]
If all of the roughly 130 offerings the SEC expects each year used the full $75 million ceiling, total annual issuance under the new exemptions would be about $9.75 billion; because the estimate covers both exemptions, this is an upper bound.
- [16]
The $5 million four-year exemption averages $1.25 million a year, one sixtieth of the $75 million permitted in a 12-month period under the larger exemption.
- [17]
An issuer raising once a year under the larger exemption files at least three documents annually: one annual report, one semiannual report and one new offering statement.
- [18]
Reiners says one potential outcome is that if investors expect a successful issuer to conduct later offerings at a higher valuation, an initial allocation may become more attractive precisely because it is limited.
ReportedContestedSource: Reiners, quoted by Cointelegraph Magazine2 sources— create a free account to open themView cited source - [19]
Tessler says scarcity in both token sales and exempt securities offerings of traditional securities long predates the proposal, and that issuers have always been able to limit round sizes and can continue to do so.
ReportedContestedSource: Lilya Tessler, Sidley2 sources— create a free account to open themView cited source
Sources
1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.
- cointelegraph.comSEC’s proposed crypto rules probably won’t spark new ICO boom
1 article · August 26, 2026
Topics and entities
Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.
Topics
- Crypto Securities RegulationFollow
- Token Fundraising ExemptionsFollow
- Retail Investor ProtectionFollow
- SEC RulemakingFollow
- Secondary Market Trading ComplianceFollow