Skip to content

Invest1 publisher2 min readPublished

SEC accuses fund advisors of selling phantom pre-IPO shares of SpaceX and OpenAI to retail investors

SEC complaints say advisors sold retail investors phantom pre-IPO stakes in SpaceX, OpenAI and others, taking over $8.7 million from 35 people in one case. In that case, the SEC says, more than half the money raised for pre-IPO deals never reached them.

The Investor · Invest desk

Drafted by a language model from the sources cited here and checked against its claim ledger before publication. How we use AISend a correction

Illustration accompanying SEC accuses fund advisors of selling phantom pre-IPO shares of SpaceX and OpenAI to retail investors
Generated illustration

What happened

  • Beyond Alpha Ventures pitched a trading fund on 153% net returns that, according to the SEC, lost money in 13 of its 14 months.
  • The partners allegedly sent investors fake statements, one hand-delivered to a Navy veteran couple saying their $750,000 had grown to $4.1 million.
  • After his firm's debit card was declined at a strip club, Owen Meyer moved $10,000 out of an account holding only investor money, the SEC claims.
  • Investor money also allegedly paid for shopping sprees at Bloomingdale's and on Amazon, according to the SEC's cases.

Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • cost By the SEC's count the alleged Beyond Alpha losses average about $249,000 per investor, and they fall on people the agency describes as mom-and-pop savers.
  • contradiction Fortune's summary says the advisors never bought shares of any company, yet the SEC's Beyond Alpha detail has some pre-IPO money reaching the deals, so at least one case is partial diversion.
  • decision A retail buyer offered SpaceX or OpenAI exposure before listing has to confirm the fund owns the shares, because in the SEC's account the statements investors got were fabricated.

The SEC says the Beyond Alpha partners handed the Navy veteran couple a statement showing a gain of about 447%, or 5.5 times their money [3]. That is nearly three times the return the partners had pitched [9][4]. By the SEC's count, the fund it was reported on avoided a loss in only one month out of 14 [10].

On the private-stock side, the SEC says less than half of nearly $6 million reached the pre-IPO deals [11]. That leaves something near $3 million that was raised to buy private stock and went elsewhere [5]. Much of it, according to the complaint, went into options trades that were later lost [11]. In the SEC's account, the partners took money for shares their investors could not reach on their own. They then spent a large part of it on trades that need no private-market access.

Fortune's account of the Meyer case is mostly a spending record. After the $10,000 transfer, the SEC says, Meyer made two club payments that came to $8,050 in 46 minutes [7][1]. That is about 45% of the $18,000 the SEC says he spent at the club [5]. Fortune does not report how much the Meyer funds raised or which startups they claimed to hold.

Fortune ties the danger to demand for pre-IPO shares, as AI companies move toward record IPOs with valuations in the trillions [15]. SpaceX and OpenAI appear in the cases the SEC detailed this week [1]. The Beyond Alpha pitch, the one case with a dollar total, rested on Kraken and SandboxAQ [9]. Two complaints disclosed in the same week cannot establish whether this kind of fraud is growing [1].

The defendants could win. One Beyond Alpha partner, reached by Fortune, called the allegations "completely false" [13]. The other partner and Meyer did not respond [14]. The cases could also stay small and isolated, with the listing calendar doing nothing to multiply them. Or the listings could surface more of them. I'd expect the third outcome. A phantom pre-IPO share is easiest to hide while no public market exists, and hardest to hide once an investor expects a share that trades.

In my view, the losses in these cases come from verification more than valuation. According to the SEC, everything the Beyond Alpha investors knew about their holdings came from statements the partners made up [12]. The view is wrong if later cases turn mostly on real shares sold at inflated prices.

What to watch

  • Whether the Beyond Alpha partners and Meyer contest the complaints in court; a defence showing the shares existed would undercut the phantom-share account.
  • Further SEC cases over pre-IPO SpaceX or OpenAI stakes as AI listings approach would test Fortune's view that deceit grows with demand.
  • A disclosed figure for how much the Meyer funds raised and which startups they claimed to hold.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories