Skip to content

Security Not yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher 2 min read Published

Picus finds simulated attacks raised an alert 14% of the time across 338 million runs

Picus Security's Blue Report 2026 puts prevention at 69% across 338 million simulated attacks. The vendor says prevention falls to 37% once an attacker has authenticated access, while the alert score has not moved from 14%.

The Watch · Security desk

Send a correction

Illustration accompanying Picus finds simulated attacks raised an alert 14% of the time across 338 million runs
Generated illustration
Prevention and logging rose; alert score held flat Picus Security's Blue Report scores, each with its earlier value where the report gives one.

Three key figures from Picus Security's Blue Report: log score 58%, up from 54%; alert score 14%, held flat; prevention score 69%, up from 62%.

Prevention and logging rose; alert score held flat
FigureValueNoteClaim
Log score58%up from 54%3
Alert score14%held flat4
Prevention score69%up from 62%2

What happened

  • The log score rose from 54% to 58% in the same data set.
  • Play ransomware fell from 50% to 13% prevention and became the hardest strain to prevent, even as the overall score rose.
  • Quiet discovery and collection actions are stopped one time in ten.

Why it matters

  • Who's exposed exposure An attacker who has obtained authenticated access meets weaker controls than the 69% headline implies, and discovery inside the network is where Picus's tests found the least resistance.
  • What it limits constraint Better logging has not produced more alerts. The log score rose 4 points while the alert score stayed flat, and Picus says the weak step is turning telemetry into timely alerts.
  • What doesn't add up contradiction The 37% is described as a post-authentication result in one place and as a per-action average in another, so citing it as an authenticated-access figure rests on one of the two wordings.

The 37% figure has two descriptions on the same page. The executive summary says prevention drops to 37% once an attacker has authenticated access [5]. The key findings say that, averaged across individual attacker actions tested, only 37% were blocked [6]. The two wordings are not obviously the same measurement, and the summary does not reconcile them. The full report sits behind a download form [17]. On either description the distance from the 69% prevention score is 32 points [21].

Detection moved less than prevention. Prevention gained 7 points [24]. The log score gained 4 [25] and reached a four-year high [9]. The alert score gained nothing [4]. Picus defines the log score as the share of simulated attacks that were logged and the alert score as the share that generated an alert [15], so the two sit 44 points apart [22]. Picus says turning telemetry into timely alerts remains the hardest part of the pipeline [16].

Picus reads the pattern as attackers favoring stealth. In its data, prevention fell for just two tactics, and stealth was one of them [13]. Low-noise actions had the highest success rates, and discovery and collection ran almost unopposed [19]. According to Picus, loud actions are caught, while an attacker inside can still map the domain with little resistance [18]. These are simulated scenarios, so they show what controls stop, not what intruders chose to do in real intrusions [8].

Signature-based defense lost ground over the same two years. Two years ago the malware download figure was 71% [23]. Picus ties the indicator-based result to signatures that cannot keep pace with nearly 2 million new files a day [11]. It says IOC-based prevention must be reinforced with TTP-based prevention [14]. Ransomware went the same direction while the overall score rose: every one of the ten least-prevented families scored 38% or lower [20].

The scores come from simulations that Picus customers ran between January and June 2026, anonymized and aggregated [8]. They describe organizations that already run attack simulations [8].

What to watch

  • The full Blue Report PDF: whether it defines the 37% figure and breaks it out by industry, region and attack vector.
  • The next Picus edition: whether the alert score moves off 14% and whether Play recovers from 13%.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence40
Adoption
Insufficient
Hype gap+20
Incentives70
Confidence45
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    The Blue Report 2026 analyzes 338 million attack simulations to show how enterprise security controls stand up to attacks.

    Reported Supported Source: Picus Security, Blue Report 2026 summary pageView cited source
  2. [2]

    Prevention Score went from 62% to 69%.

    Reported Supported Source: Picus Security, Blue Report 2026 summary pageView cited source
  3. [3]

    Log Score went from 54% to 58%.

    Reported Supported Source: Picus Security, Blue Report 2026 summary pageView cited source

Get this ledger inside ChatGPT. Ask about any of our stories and the answer brings its figure, each claim’s verdict and the sources. Free, no account.

Add to ChatGPTAdd to Claude

Sources

1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. picussecurity.com

    1 article · October 15, 2026

    https://www.sans.org/info/237020

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Topics

Loading related stories