Science1 publisher3 min readPublished
One thorium site in four: the crystal detail that makes a solid-state nuclear clock buildable
A Science paper maps the four places a thorium-229 atom can sit in a calcium fluoride crystal and finds only one with a clean nuclear transition. That turns a materials guess into a spec.
The Scientist · Science desk
Drafted by a language model from the sources cited here and checked against its claim ledger before publication. How we use AISend a correction

What happened
- Today's best atomic clocks track time by measuring how electrons jump between energy states when exposed to particular laser light, and would lose less than one second of accuracy over the entire age of the universe so far.
- Those clocks are delicate: an entire lab's worth of vacuum chambers and shielding is required to prevent interference from stray electric or magnetic fields.
- Scientists aim to move the clock reference from the electrons on the outside of the atom to the nucleus within, tracking how energy flips a single neutron between quantum states.
- According to Thorsten Schumm, a physicist at the Vienna University of Technology, such a switch could make clocks up to 10 times more precise, the atom itself would shield the clock from some outside interference, and such atoms could be embedded protectively in a crystal.
- In a new study in Science, Schumm and colleagues mapped the four places a thorium atom can sit inside a crystal and found one close to ideal for building the most precise clock ever.
Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
A team led by Thorsten Schumm at the Vienna University of Technology has published a map, in Science, of the four lattice positions a thorium atom can occupy inside a doped crystal, and identified the one that supports a clean nuclear transition [5]. That single result converts the solid-state nuclear clock from a materials guessing game into an engineering target, because the other three sites were quietly poisoning the measurement [12].
The motivation is not accuracy alone. The best optical atomic clocks, which read time off electron transitions driven by laser light, would drift less than a second over the age of the universe [1]. They pay for that with an entire lab's worth of vacuum chambers and shielding to keep stray electric and magnetic fields out [2]. Moving the reference from the electrons to the nucleus, flipping a single neutron between quantum states [3], could improve precision by up to a factor of ten while letting the atom shield itself, and would allow the atoms to be embedded in a crystal, according to Schumm [4].
Only one isotope permits this at all. Flipping a neutron this way normally demands a gamma-ray laser, which does not exist; thorium-229 is the known exception, and in 2024 researchers showed the transition can be driven with ultraviolet light [6]. Andrei Derevianko of the University of Nevada, Reno, who was not involved, calls thorium-229 "a quirk of nature" whose transition energy is low enough to be reached by high-purity laser light [7].
The host material took fifteen years to work out: calcium fluoride doped with thorium-229 impurities, grown as transparent millimetre-sized cubes [8]. Schumm describes crystal growing as closer to cooking than physics, and says the finished piece looks like a scrap of glass carrying tens of thousands of hours of learning [9]. The catch the group ran into is the one that matters for hardware: a thorium atom in a bad internal position sees an uneven electric field, and that degrades the clock's timing [10].
The experiment to sort the sites was blunt and slow. The group illuminated the crystal with a custom ultraviolet laser at a fixed wavelength for 60 seconds, switched it off, watched for five minutes as excited nuclei decayed and re-emitted, then shifted frequency and repeated [11] - roughly six minutes of wall-clock time per frequency point [19]. Three of the four sites emitted at multiple wavelengths, the signature of an uneven local field; the fourth answered at a single wavelength [12]. Three quarters of the available sites are therefore unusable as a clock reference [18].
Outside assessments are supportive rather than hedged. Eric Hudson of UCLA, not involved, says the data is what the field has wanted to see for some time [13]; Ekkehard Peik, who heads the Time and Frequency Department at Germany's national metrology institute and was also not involved, calls it a very important result for solid-state nuclear clock research [14].
What to watch: Schumm's group has built early prototypes and patented a route to a chip-scale version [15], while a group led by Shiqian Ding at Tsinghua University has demonstrated a prototype with comparable results using a stronger laser and a lower thorium-229 concentration [16]. Schumm declines to say when nuclear clocks will beat the best atomic clocks [17]. The interesting number will be the first published stability figure from a crystal grown deliberately to favour the good site.