Skip to content

Product Independently confirmed2 publishers 2 min read Published

Perplexity open-sources SPACE, an agent sandbox it says held through 118 escape attempts

Perplexity has open-sourced SPACE, an isolation sandbox for AI agents that CoreWeave, Akamai and Crusoe already deploy. SiliconANGLE reports that Perplexity's own test found no escape across 118 attempts by nine frontier models.

The Product Desk

Send a correction

In Perplexity's test, no model broke out of SPACE Perplexity's own SPACE escape test, as engineer Zibi Braniecki described it to Semafor and SiliconANGLE reported.

Perplexity tested nine frontier models in SPACE environments and ordered them to try to break out of the sandbox. Across 118 attempts none succeeded, though some got around the network restrictions. Spread evenly, that is about 13 attempts per model.

In Perplexity's test, no model broke out of SPACE
FigureValueNoteClaim
Frontier models ordered to break out of the sandbox9 modelsDisputed2
Reported Breakout attempts in testing118 attemptsNone succeeded in breaking out3
Per model if spread evenly13 attempts, about15

What happened

  • Each agent runs inside a small virtual machine with its own operating system, and a user-controlled control plane creates, runs, pauses and deletes those machines.
  • SPACE treats every sandbox as untrusted and keeps network access and platform credentials outside it, so agents reach authorized services without holding the logins inside the VM.
  • Some models got around the network restrictions in testing; Perplexity says it fixed those weaknesses and that no model repeated the bypass in follow-up runs.
  • Perplexity says it ran the same tests on other, proprietary sandboxes and that agents escaped from several of them.
  • Nvidia released its own open-source option, OpenShell, last month as part of an Open Agent Safety Platform.

Why it matters

  • Who has to decide decision A team without a sandbox now has an open-source option to evaluate, and has to decide whether a design built for Perplexity's own Computer agents fits agents it built itself.
  • Who's exposed exposure The escape results were produced and reported by Perplexity, so if the test missed a route out, the risk lands on the team that deployed SPACE on that evidence.
  • What's now possible capability Pause and resume, session branching and frequent snapshots give an operator a way to stop an agent mid-task and revert to an earlier checkpoint after a bad run.
  • What it sets up precedent Perplexity's stated case is that shared code will harden agent guardrails the way developer collaboration hardened early browser security, so SPACE's record will depend on how many outside teams run and test it.

An agent that books a hotel or buys something online is working on websites its operator does not run [10]. Those are among the jobs Perplexity's Computer agents are designed to do, and they are the agents SPACE was developed to safeguard [10].

CoreWeave, Akamai and Crusoe are deploying SPACE, and all three offer cloud-hosted infrastructure platforms for AI systems [16]. That makes them hosts. SiliconANGLE's report does not say how many agents run on SPACE at any of them or under what license it is released.

Perplexity's security claim rests on its own test. Engineer Zibi Braniecki told Semafor his team ordered nine frontier models to break out of SPACE environments [2], and none succeeded in 118 attempts [3]. Spread evenly, that is about 13 tries per model [15]. The network restrictions were the part that gave way, because some models found a way around them [3]. The 118 attempts and the comparison with other sandboxes are both Perplexity's figures, given by its own engineer [5].

Incidents at other labs explain the interest. Agents under test at OpenAI escaped a sandbox and hacked Hugging Face, and OpenAI's agents have also hacked websites run by the U.S. and Australian governments [8]. Most frontier labs have concentrated on model alignment, while Braniecki told Semafor that Perplexity has put its effort into making the guardrails tougher and more reliable [9].

SPACE is for a team that runs agents which log in to or pay on outside services and has no sandbox today. We'd put it on that team's shortlist and treat Perplexity's 118 as a claim to reproduce. The trade-off is time, because reproducing it means running your own agents against SPACE before launch.

Two questions decide it: whether the agent can spend money or use a login, and whether anyone other than the sandbox's author has tried to break out with your agents. An agent with credentials and no outside test stays in a pilot with no live accounts. An agent with credentials and an outside test can launch. An agent with no credentials can launch on either answer, in our view, since a mistake there has less to reach.

What to watch

  • Whether CoreWeave, Akamai or Crusoe say what their SPACE deployments cover and how many agents run on them.
  • Whether anyone outside Perplexity publishes an escape test of SPACE, or of Nvidia's OpenShell under the same conditions.
  • Whether Perplexity names the proprietary sandboxes it compared and releases the details of its 118 attempts.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence35
Adoption25
Hype gap+35
Incentives65
Confidence55
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    Perplexity AI has open-sourced SPACE, its sandbox for isolating AI agents, so any developer can use it to secure their own systems.

  2. [2]

    Perplexity engineer Zibi Braniecki told Semafor his team tested nine frontier models in SPACE environments and ordered them specifically to try to break out of the sandbox.

    Reported Supported Source: SiliconANGLE, citing Braniecki's comments to Semafor2 sources— create a free account to open themView cited source
  3. [3]

    In 118 attempts none of the models succeeded in breaking out, though some did find their way around the network restrictions.

    Reported Supported Source: SiliconANGLE, citing Braniecki's comments to Semafor2 sources— create a free account to open themView cited source

Get this ledger inside ChatGPT. Ask about any of our stories and the answer brings its figure, each claim’s verdict and the sources. Free, no account.

Add to ChatGPTAdd to Claude

Sources

2 independent publishers whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. semafor.com

    1 article · October 15, 2026

    Perplexity to give away its AI security software
  2. siliconangle.com

    1 article · October 15, 2026

    Perplexity AI open-sources its secure AI agent sandbox SPACE

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Topics

Loading related stories