Skip to content

Product1 publisher3 min readPublished

AMC's $2 million website pledge is a hot-spot problem, not a scalping problem

Adam Aron apologized on X after the Dune: Part Three onsale broke AMC's site and promised $2 million in fixes. The number that explains the failure is 30: the count of 70mm IMAX venues.

The Product Desk · Product desk

Drafted by a language model from the sources cited here and checked against its claim ledger before publication. How we use AISend a correction

Photograph accompanying AMC's $2 million website pledge is a hot-spot problem, not a scalping problem
Photo: forbes.com

What happened

  • Advance tickets for Dune: Part Three went on sale Tuesday and caused such a stir that Adam Aron, CEO of AMC Theatres, apologized on X and pledged to spend $2 million to improve his company's website so it would not fail again as it did that day.
  • There are only about 30 or so 70mm IMAX film locations around the world.
  • Because of that handful of locations, probably tens of thousands of people try to buy tickets at a few specific theaters that can only do a few screenings per day, and that concentration of web traffic breaks the system down for everyone else.
  • AMC and Fandango are not crashing because of fans buying tickets to a normal, IMAX, or Dolby screening of Dune: Part Three somewhere in rural America; they break for people in rural America because of how many people are going after so few screenings in New York and Los Angeles.
  • The contested inventory is a few daily showtimes at fewer than about 30 venues worldwide, against tens of thousands of concurrent buyers.

Compiled by The Product DeskSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

Advance tickets for Dune: Part Three went on sale Tuesday, and the onsale caused enough of a stir that AMC Theatres chief executive Adam Aron apologized on X and pledged to spend $2 million improving the company's website so it would not fail again the way it did that day [1]. The resale market that formed around those seats is getting the attention; the more useful story for anyone who owns a checkout path is the shape of the failure.

The demand was not distributed. There are only about 30 70mm IMAX film locations in the world [2]. According to Gizmodo, tens of thousands of people were trying to buy tickets at a handful of specific theaters that can run only a few screenings a day, and that concentration of web traffic broke the system for everyone else [3]. AMC and Fandango were not falling over because fans wanted a standard, IMAX, or Dolby seat for Dune: Part Three in rural America; they were failing for those buyers because of how many people were chasing the few screenings in New York and Los Angeles [4].

That is a hot-partition problem, not an aggregate capacity problem. The contested inventory amounts to a few daily showtimes across fewer than 30 venues worldwide, pursued by tens of thousands of concurrent buyers [5]. Meanwhile the same films may screen 100 times a day at some theaters, across multiple screens [6]. The seats exist. The queue is pinned to a fraction of them.

The pattern across recent onsales supports reading this as a format problem rather than a popularity problem. The Odyssey went on sale a year before release, months before Christopher Nolan had finished the film [7], and that onsale was, in Gizmodo's description, extremely frustrating [8]. Avengers: Doomsday drew few reported problems [9], and Spider-Man: Brand New Day did not break anything either [10]. What separates them, in Gizmodo's account, is that Nolan and Denis Villeneuve made their films to be seen in 70mm IMAX and the studios marketed them that way, leaving the impression that watching in any other format was not really watching the film [11]. Marketing manufactured the hot spot; the storefront absorbed it.

Which is why $2 million announced on a social platform is a number rather than a plan. As reported, Aron's commitment is a dollar figure and an apology, with no stated description of what changes in the system [12]. Money buys servers, queueing, and inventory handling, but the failing component here was a small set of very popular rows in a very large catalogue, and nothing in the pledge says which of those the spend addresses.

The window has already moved from days or weeks of advance sales to months [13], so the load pattern will recur. Watch the next onsale for a film marketed on 70mm IMAX, and whether AMC puts a visible waiting room or lottery in front of the scarce venues rather than treating the event as generic traffic. Watch also whether Gizmodo's read holds, that months-ahead selling stays a tactic viable for a few select films rather than becoming standard practice [14], because the engineering bill is very different if every tentpole onsale becomes a concert onsale.

Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories