Invest1 distinct publisher3 min readUpdated
Mid-tier condo prices are down 15% to 33% from peak in 33 bigger US markets, and in six the index is back under 2006. That is a collateral question, not a housing headline.
The Investor · Invest desk
Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made
Wolf Richter's July read of the Zillow Home Value Index counts 33 bigger US markets where mid-tier condo and co-op prices have fallen 15% to 33% from their own prior peaks [1], and in six of those the index now sits below the 2006 peak of the last housing bubble [2]. Single-family housing gets the coverage, but condos are where the post-2021 unwind is actually printing, and the depth of it changes what a condo lien is worth as collateral.
The six that have round-tripped two decades are Oakland, Contra Costa County in the East Bay, Sarasota County, Cape Coral, Fort Myers and Orlando [2] - four Florida markets and two Bay Area ones [3]. In at least one of the 33, prices are back to where they first were in mid-2005, 21 years ago [4]. Nine markets, from Oakland to Jacksonville, are down 21% or more, and three in California and Florida are down over 30% [5][6].
The peaks being measured from are recent: they landed between 2021 and 2024, with the vast majority in mid-2022 [7]. That matters for vintage. The run-up into those peaks was 50% to 70% in some cities over the two years from mid-2020 [8], on top of 10-year gains of 180% to 350% [9]. Loans written into the 2021-2022 window in the six sub-2006 markets are now marked against a comp set that has given back everything since the last bubble [2], and the concentration in Florida and the East Bay [3] means the exposure is not evenly spread across regional books.
The direction of travel has not turned. Houston and Tempe crossed the minus-15% line in July and joined the list, and no market that was on the list in June came off it [10]. Another 37 bigger cities are down 8% to 14% from their peaks [11], which puts roughly 70 bigger markets in some stage of decline [12]. Richter flags San Antonio and Dallas as a few bad months from crossing into the steeper group [13].
Two constraints on reading too much into it. The index is a backward-looking, seasonally adjusted three-month average, built from public records, MLS, brokerage and other feeds and including off-market and for-sale-by-owner deals [14]. It lags and it smooths, so the current cash market in Cape Coral or Oakland is likely worse than the July print rather than better. And condo share varies enormously: in some dense cities condos and co-ops are the majority of home sales, while in most other markets they are a relatively small portion [15]. This is a collateral-type problem, not a national housing call.
On the mechanism, be honest about what the source does and does not say. Richter notes condos face different dynamics than single-family homes, dynamics that fuel outsized booms and busts [16], but the excerpt does not quantify the HOA, reserve or insurance channel. Anyone holding paper in Florida or the Bay Area should be pulling association financials and assessment histories directly rather than inferring them from a price index.
What to watch: whether San Antonio and Dallas cross minus 15% [13], whether the June-to-July pattern of additions with no exits holds [10], and whether any of the 37 markets in the 8% to 14% band start to converge on the Florida and California declines [11][6].
Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
In 33 bigger US markets, prices of mid-tier condos through July dropped by 15% to 33% from their respective peaks in prior years.
In six of the 33 markets, condo prices have already dropped below their Housing Bubble 1 peaks of 2006 and are back where they had been 20 years ago: Oakland CA; Sarasota County FL; Cape Coral FL; Contra Costa County (East Bay) CA; Fort Myers FL; Orlando FL.
In at least one of the charted markets, prices of mid-tier condos are back to where they had first been in mid-2005, 21 years ago.
In nine of the 33 markets, from Oakland to Jacksonville, prices of mid-tier condos dropped by 21% or more.
In three of the markets, located in California and Florida, condo prices fell by more than 30%.
Of the six markets now below their 2006 peaks, four are in Florida (Sarasota County, Cape Coral, Fort Myers, Orlando) and two are in California (Oakland, Contra Costa County).
Evidence-backed comparisons of source perspectives and observed adoption signals. Read the methodology
Which Builder, Operator, and Investor concerns the observed source mix emphasized—not a truth score.
Evidence, demonstrated adoption, hype gap, incentives, and confidence are assessed independently, each on its own current evidence. How these are measured.
Specific, methodologically disclosed, but single-source and single-vendor
The numbers are unusually specific for a one-source cluster — named markets, per-market decline bands, peak years, month-over-month list changes — and the article discloses its methodology (seasonally adjusted three-month averages of mid-tier condos and co-ops from the Zillow Home Value Index). What is missing is independent verification: no second index, no transaction-volume or inventory data, and no external comment. Structural claims about condo economics are asserted qualitatively without figures, and the forward call on San Antonio and Dallas is unquantified.
Broad and still widening across US markets
Read as real-world spread of the phenomenon rather than product uptake: the drawdown is not isolated to one metro. Thirty-three bigger markets are down 15%-33%, a further sampled 37 are down 8%-14%, six have crossed below 2006 peaks, and the steep list gained Houston and Tempe in July with no exits. That is wide geographic incidence with a still-deteriorating direction, tempered by the fact that all incidence is measured by one index and that condos are a small share of sales in most of these markets.
Mildly overstated framing over solid underlying numbers
The underlying figures are concrete and internally consistent, but the packaging runs ahead of them. 'Historic condo bubbles deflate', 'spooky charts' and a framing that the correction is clearing sit on top of a backward-looking, smoothed single-vendor index, and the same article notes the affected markets rose 180%-350% in the decade to peak — so a 33% drawdown leaves prices well above pre-mania levels, which softens the collapse narrative. The unquantified San Antonio and Dallas forward call adds a further increment of claim beyond evidence.
Independent outlet with a visible bearish house style, dependent on one vendor's index
The observable incentive facts are limited but real: the piece is authored by the site's own proprietor for his own publication, its language and recurring monthly-list format reward a continuing decline narrative, and the entire analytical base is one commercial data provider's index. There is no disclosed financial stake in the assets discussed and no vendor or advertiser is being promoted, so the pressure looks editorial and audience-driven rather than transactional. No further incentive facts are supplied, so this score reflects only what the source itself shows.
Moderate-low: one publisher, one index, no corroboration
Confidence is limited primarily by cluster structure rather than by sloppy reporting. A single publisher supplies every claim, so nothing is cross-checked, and the figures are derived from one smoothed, revisable index. Offsetting that, the methodology is stated, the market lists and decline bands are falsifiable against public ZHVI data, and the month-over-month list change is a checkable, dated observation. The qualitative and forward-looking portions carry materially less confidence than the price series.
invest
Austin -26%, San Francisco -6%: Stop Marking Housing at the National Level1 distinct publisher
invest
Mid-Tier Home Prices Fell in 24 of 33 Big Cities. San Francisco Spiked 11.6%.1 distinct publisher
invest
Treasury moved $742 billion in a week. The price was a 5.216% thirty-year.1 distinct publisher
invest
Central banks have sold $233 billion of Treasuries since February. Private money did not blink1 distinct publisher
Distinct publishers with included, body-backed reporting in this cluster.