Skip to content

Security Not yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher 2 min read Published

Netscout ties much of a 1,286% rise in DDoS attacks above 1 Tbps or 1 Gpps to Aisuru-linked botnets

Netscout reports that DDoS attacks exceeding 1 Tbps or 1 Gpps rose 1,286% year over year in the first half of 2026. It says many of these floods exhaust firewalls and load balancers before the link fills.

The Watch · Security desk

Send a correction

Illustration accompanying Netscout ties much of a 1,286% rise in DDoS attacks above 1 Tbps or 1 Gpps to Aisuru-linked botnets
Generated illustration
Largest DDoS attacks outpaced overall growth Netscout's year-over-year growth in attacks above 1 Tbps or 1 Gpps, set against all DDoS attacks it recorded worldwide from January to June 2026.

Attacks exceeding 1 Tbps or 1 Gpps rose 1,286% year over year, about 13.9 times the year-earlier level. Netscout recorded more than 9.1 million DDoS attacks worldwide from January to June 2026, up nearly a quarter year over year.

Largest DDoS attacks outpaced overall growth
FigureValueNoteClaim
Rise in attacks above 1 Tbps or 1 Gpps, year over year1,286%2
Multiple of year-earlier level, about13.9 timesattacks above 1 Tbps or 1 Gpps14
DDoS attacks worldwide, Jan-June 2026, over9.1 million attacksup nearly a quarter year over year1

What happened

  • Netscout counted more than 9.1 million DDoS attacks worldwide from January to June 2026, nearly a quarter more than a year earlier.
  • Carpet-bombing made up a larger share of the attacks Netscout observed: 4.54% in the first half of 2026, up from 3.97% in the same period of 2025.
  • Every DDoS-for-hire service Netscout reviewed had its launch form preset to a single 60-second attack with a free method selected.
  • Attacks of billions of packets per second have overwhelmed router line cards that lacked protection, and a stalled card can cut off customers and networks that were not targeted.

Why it matters

  • What it limits constraint Carpet-bombing keeps traffic to each address under detection thresholds, while blocking broadly across the prefix disrupts customers. Filtering has to be selective to work.
  • Who has to decide decision Provider controls often protect shared infrastructure first and leave customer protection to dedicated DDoS services. Each enterprise has to decide where its own filtering sits.
  • What doesn't add up contradiction Modi stresses short attacks, yet those lasting a minute or less nearly doubled only from 1.6% of incidents to 3.1%. The other 96.9% run longer, so a defense sized for bursts misses most attacks.

Netscout's case for finer controls comes from Hardik Modi, VP Engineering for DDoS Solutions. "With the proliferation of residential proxies and short, rate-based attacks from DDoS-for-hire platforms, traditional coarse network controls are insufficient. Providers and enterprises alike need finer-grained, selective mitigation and increased scrubbing capacity at network edges to combat these qualitative shifts in attack sophistication," Modi said [4].

The 1,286% figure works out to about 13.9 times the year-earlier level [14]. Netscout says much of the growth came from botnet operators associated with Aisuru, Kimwolf, Jackskid and their successors [3], and that attackers therefore need fewer devices to launch large attacks [18]. The figure covers two thresholds, 1 Tbps and 1 Gpps, and Help Net Security's account of the report does not split them, give the counts behind them, or say how many attacks exhausted equipment before a link filled [2]. In our view the line-card cases are the specific failures the report describes. The firewall and load balancer point is Netscout's statement of the mechanism [5][6].

The share of attacks that service providers mitigated moved by less than a point: 23.12% against 22.35% a year earlier, a gain of 0.77 points [8][15]. Netscout says the growth in total attacks raised both the number mitigated and the number that reached their targets [9].

Sellers promote methods they claim can bypass specific defenses, and they stress packet, connection and request rates over bandwidth [19]. Help Net Security's account says those claims have not been independently verified [19]. Advertised plans run from free access to around $20,000 a month, and matching tiers and near-identical backend technology indicate that competing storefronts may share infrastructure [20].

What to watch

  • A breakdown of the 1,286% rise by bandwidth threshold and packet-rate threshold, with the attack counts behind each.
  • Independent testing of the DDoS-for-hire sellers' claims that their methods bypass specific defenses.
  • Any disruption of the shared backend infrastructure that Netscout says may sit behind competing DDoS-for-hire storefronts.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence55
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+15
Incentives60
Confidence60
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    More than 9.1 million DDoS attacks were recorded globally between January and June 2026, an increase of nearly a quarter year over year, according to Netscout's DDoS Threat Intelligence Report.

    Reported Supported Source: Netscout DDoS Threat Intelligence Report, as reported by Help Net SecurityView cited source
  2. [2]

    Attacks exceeding 1 Tbps or 1 Gpps increased 1,286% year over year.

    Reported Supported Source: Netscout DDoS Threat Intelligence Report, as reported by Help Net SecurityView cited source
  3. [3]

    Much of the growth in attacks above 1 Tbps or 1 Gpps came from botnet operators associated with Aisuru, Kimwolf, Jackskid, and their successors.

    Reported Supported Source: Netscout, as reported by Help Net SecurityView cited source

Get this ledger inside ChatGPT. Ask about any of our stories and the answer brings its figure, each claim’s verdict and the sources. Free, no account.

Add to ChatGPTAdd to Claude

Sources

1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. helpnetsecurity.com

    1 article · October 15, 2026

    DDoS attacks can knock services offline before links reach capacity

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Entities

Loading related stories