Skip to content

Build Not yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher 2 min read Published

A twelve-node n8n workflow that runs 2,000 times a month counts as 2,000 executions

n8n's pricing page counts one execution per workflow run, from EUR 20 a month for 2,500 executions up to EUR 667 for 40,000, a DEV Community review says. In the review's examples, the run schedule decides which tier a team lands on.

The Engineer · Build desk

Send a correction

Illustration accompanying A twelve-node n8n workflow that runs 2,000 times a month counts as 2,000 executions
Generated illustration
A 5-minute sync outgrows Starter but fits Pro Executions from a sync that runs every 5 minutes over 30 days, set against the executions included in n8n's Starter and Pro plans, per a DEV Community review.

Key figures: a sync every 5 minutes produces 8,640 executions over 30 days. The Starter plan includes 2,500 executions a month and the Pro plan 10,000, so the sync is over Starter's quota and inside Pro's.

A 5-minute sync outgrows Starter but fits Pro
FigureValueNoteClaim
Executions from a sync every 5 minutes, over 30 days8,640 executions7
Starter plan, a month2,500 executions1
Pro plan, a month10,000 executions1

What happened

  • Pro costs EUR 50 a month for 10,000 executions, and Enterprise is priced by quote.
  • A loop that handles 500 records inside one run still counts as a single execution, the review says.
  • A sync that runs every 5 minutes produces 8,640 executions in 30 days, over Starter's 2,500 and inside Pro's 10,000.
  • Workflows keep running past the quota, and unpaid overage charges are invoiced 45 days after they occur.
  • On Business the page lists an overage of EUR 4,000 for each extra bucket of 300,000 executions.

Why it matters

  • What it limits constraint Packing work into one run saves executions. Starter, though, caps concurrency at 5 executions and run length at 5 minutes, and long AI or batch workflows can go past those limits.
  • What it costs cost A team that outgrows Pro's 10,000 pays about 3.3 times more per included execution on Business, and takes on its own servers.
  • Who's exposed exposure On Business and Enterprise, the daily license check sends production execution counts to n8n, with telemetry on by default.
  • What doesn't add up contradiction For Pro, the plan card gives a concurrency ceiling of 50 executions but the feature table lists 20 / 50. Confirm the limits on the live page before buying.

The metering favours long workflows. A per-task meter, as the review describes it, counts every action in a run [5]. If each of the twelve nodes in the review's example counted as an action, 2,000 runs would register as 24,000 units [22]. n8n counts that workflow as 2,000 executions [3].

The review points to separate n8n vs Zapier and n8n vs Make comparisons for how the three tools meter usage [23]. It does not list their prices. For the gap to reach the invoice, a team's workflows need many billable steps per run, and the rival's price per unit must not be low enough to cancel the step count.

Run count is the meter, so the schedule sets the tier. Webhook-triggered workflows count one execution per incoming event, so volume is harder to predict [8]. The review says switching a poll to a webhook, or polling less often, can keep a team on a smaller plan [14].

Per included execution, Starter works out to EUR 0.008 [18] and Pro to EUR 0.005 [19]. Business is about EUR 0.0167 [20].

The review's agent example shows where that lands. At 15,000 messages a month, one execution each, a team is above Pro's 10,000 [9]. Business covers 40,000 at about EUR 8,004 a year, self-hosted only, plus the team's own infrastructure [15]. The review adds that batching or filtering messages before they trigger a run can change the answer [16].

We think this is the right trade for teams with long workflows that fire on events, and the wrong one for teams that poll on short intervals. The context is the tier gap. In the review's listing, the step above Pro's 10,000 executions is a self-hosted tier at EUR 667 [1].

The review checked the pricing page on October 15, 2026. The page shows prices in euros, defaults to annual billing and does not show an effective date [6].

What to watch

  • A priced comparison of one twelve-node workflow on n8n, Zapier and Make would show whether the metering gap becomes a bill gap.
  • An effective date on n8n's pricing page, and a single concurrency figure for Pro, would remove the page's own contradictions.
  • Any hosted tier between Pro's 10,000 executions and the self-hosted Business tier would change the budget for mid-volume teams.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence55
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap
Not scored
Incentives50
Confidence60
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    n8n Cloud costs EUR 20 a month (Starter, 2,500 workflow executions), EUR 50 a month (Pro, 10,000) or EUR 667 a month (Business, 40,000, self-hosted only), all billed annually; Enterprise is by quote.

    Reported Supported Source: DEV Community review of n8n's pricing pageView cited source
  2. [2]

    n8n counts one execution per workflow run, however many steps it has.

    Reported Supported Source: DEV Community review of n8n's pricing pageView cited source
  3. [3]

    A workflow with twelve nodes that fires 2,000 times in a month is 2,000 executions.

    Reported Supported Source: DEV Community review of n8n's pricing pageView cited source

Get this ledger inside ChatGPT. Ask about any of our stories and the answer brings its figure, each claim’s verdict and the sources. Free, no account.

Add to ChatGPTAdd to Claude

Sources

1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. dev.to

    1 article · October 16, 2026

    n8n Pricing in 2026: What Each Plan Costs and What You Actually Get

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Topics

Loading related stories