Science1 distinct publisher3 min readUpdated
Jakarta has dozens of aircraft on standby to seed clouds over Borneo. Its own burned-area figure is roughly a third of what independent monitoring reports.
The Scientist · Science desk

Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made
Indonesia is putting dozens of helicopters and fixed-wing aircraft on standby to seed clouds over burning Borneo, a technique that is rarely used against wildfires anywhere in the world [1][2]. The scale-up is arriving before either the method's effectiveness or the size of the fire season has been pinned down: the government reports more than 100,000 hectares burned in the first half of the year, while the deforestation monitoring site Nusantara Atlas puts the figure through July at more than 285,000 hectares [3][4].
The two counts do not cover identical periods, so the gap is not a clean discrepancy. It is still large. Nusantara Atlas is reporting roughly 2.9 times the government's number, a difference of about 185,000 hectares, an area Agence France-Presse notes is more than four times the size of Jakarta [5][6][4]. For anyone judging whether an intervention works, that is the denominator problem in plain sight. Hotspot suppression claims are measured against a baseline that two credible counters cannot agree on.
The operational tempo is real. The BMKG weather agency says Indonesia carried out 252 cloud-seeding operations between 2021 and August this year, against 85 in the preceding decade, roughly three times as many sorties in a shorter window [7][8]. Most of those flights were not about fire: they aimed to pull rain away from flooded areas, though many targeted wildfires or the wetting of flammable peatland [9]. The technique itself is not new in the country, having first been used in 1977 to fill a dam [10].
The physical constraint is acknowledged by the people flying the missions. "Weather modification does not create clouds: we optimize clouds that have the potential to produce rain," meteorologist Safillah Anggie Wahyuni told AFP after a flight over Palangkaraya in Central Kalimantan, adding that it works "only if the conditions are right" [11][12]. That is a problem in the dry season, when fires peak. I Putu Santikayasa, a hydroclimatology lecturer at IPB University, told AFP effectiveness "will be very low because of the lack of clouds" [13].
The supporting evidence is thin and comes from inside the program. Research authored by BMKG weather modification director Budi Harsoyo found a 12-day operation in 2023 doubled likely rainfall and eliminated fire hotspots [14]. Harsoyo also calls cloud seeding "a mitigation effort, not a permanent solution" and says there is no evidence of harm from it [15]. Independent research, according to AFP's summary, suggests cloud seeding efficacy is hard to assess at all, with open questions about the cost and about widespread silver iodide use [16][17].
Meanwhile the actual suppression work is manual: nearly 50,000 firefighters are currently deployed [18]. Peat fires smolder underground and reignite, which is why wetting is the strategy at all [19]. WALHI campaign coordinator Uli Arta Siagian argues the state's job is upstream, "by not issuing permits in areas that are vulnerable to fire" [20]. Large plantations are barred from burning to clear land; smallholders are exempt, and the practice is blamed for most of the country's fires [21].
Watch whether the government's burned-area figure converges with Nusantara Atlas as the season closes, whether BMKG publishes outcomes per sortie rather than per campaign, and whether the environment minister's threatened fines and criminal penalties for illegal burning produce cases [22]. Haze has already spiked pollution in Malaysian Borneo and closed schools [23].
Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
The Indonesian government has said dozens of helicopters and fixed-wing planes are on standby for cloud seeding nationwide.
Research suggests the efficacy of cloud seeding is hard to assess.
Cloud seeding has raised questions about harms linked to widespread use of silver iodide, as well as about cost.
Cloud seeding, which involves sprinkling silver iodide, salts or other particles into clouds to trigger precipitation, is rarely used to tackle wildfires globally.
Indonesia carried out 252 cloud-seeding operations between 2021 and August this year, up from 85 in the preceding decade, according to the BMKG weather agency.
Most Indonesian cloud-seeding operations tried to draw rain away from flooded areas, but many sought to douse wildfires or wet flammable peatlands.
Evidence-backed comparisons of source perspectives and observed adoption signals. Read the methodology
Which Builder, Operator, and Investor concerns the observed source mix emphasized—not a truth score.
Evidence, demonstrated adoption, hype gap, incentives, and confidence are assessed independently, each on its own current evidence. How these are measured.
Single wire report, named sources, one interested study
All material rests on one AFP-sourced item. Within it the sourcing is decent: named BMKG officials, a named IPB academic, a named WALHI coordinator, agency operation counts, and an independent monitoring figure from Nusantara Atlas. But the only quantified efficacy result is authored by the programme's own director, the article itself says efficacy is hard to assess, and no cost, budget, or methodology detail is provided. Nothing is corroborated by a second publisher.
Real, scaling state deployment with ground effort dominant
Deployment is concrete and documented rather than announced: dozens of aircraft on standby, 252 seeding sorties since 2021 versus 85 in the prior decade, nearly 50,000 firefighters in the field, plus satellite monitoring and peatland rewetting. Adoption is not full because seeding remains an auxiliary layer — the bulk of firefighting is still ground-based, and historically most seeding sorties served flood diversion rather than fire suppression.
Capability framing runs ahead of verified effect
The government's framing — a standby fleet, continuous weather alert, a tripling of sorties — is materially stronger than the demonstrated effect on fires. A named hydroclimatologist says effectiveness will be very low in the dry season precisely because clouds are scarce, the programme's own director calls it mitigation rather than a solution, efficacy is described as hard to assess, and the sole favourable quantification is self-authored. The gap widens because the state cannot yet agree with independent monitors on how much land has burned, so success against the fire season is not measurable on the state's own numbers. It is not larger than this because deployment is genuine and officials do publicly qualify the method's limits.
Evaluator and operator are the same agency; visible-action pressure
The favourable efficacy research is authored by the BMKG official who directs the weather modification programme being evaluated, and the same official issues the no-evidence-of-harm assurance — evaluator and operator are not separated. Government actors face acute pressure to show visible action given the 2015 haze precedent and current school closures across the border in Malaysian Borneo, and an aerial programme is highly visible. Counter-incentives are also present and disclosed: WALHI campaigns for permit restrictions, and the smallholder burning exemption protects an entrenched practice blamed for most ignitions.
Deployment facts firm, effectiveness and magnitude unresolved
Confidence is moderate. The operational facts — standby aircraft, sortie counts, firefighter numbers, haze-driven school closures — are specific, attributed and internally consistent, so the scale-up itself is credible. What remains unresolved is whether seeding materially suppresses fires, at what cost, and how much land has actually burned. With one publisher, one interested study, contested burned-area data and no cost figures, the interpretive layer cannot be pinned down.
science
A named ship and a published timetable turn the Arctic into a bookable lane1 distinct publisher
invest
46.9% full, 21.9 points below norm: Korea puts a number on drought's input cost1 distinct publisher
science
Honduras puts 234 of 298 municipalities on drought alert, and names its own end date1 distinct publisher
science
Belgium's peat fire took seven days and four countries' aircraft to contain1 distinct publisher
Distinct publishers with included, body-backed reporting in this cluster.
1 article · August 18, 2026