Skip to content
Today
Sign in

Invest2 publishersIndependently confirmed3 min readPublished

Maas Group's A$517 million drop outruns the reported Firmus price cut

Maas Group shares fell as much as 30% as demand faded for the A$11-a-share IPO of Nvidia-backed Firmus, the AI data centre operator it part-owns. Its A$517 million loss by the close is about five times what the reported A$8.25 price would take off the stake.

The Investor · Invest desk

How we use AISend a correction

Photograph accompanying Maas Group's A$517 million drop outruns the reported Firmus price cut
Photo: businessnewsaustralia.com

What happened

  • Firmus and its advisers were weighing a smaller offer at A$8.25 a share, down from A$11, according to local media reports cited by Reuters.
  • Maas pared its losses to close down 22.4%, its weakest level since May 6, leaving the company valued at A$1.79 billion.
  • Bookbuilding closed on Thursday, and a term sheet told potential investors the joint bookrunners would provide further information on the offer.
  • The $5 billion offering was to be Australia's largest share sale in nearly three decades, behind only Telstra's roughly $10 billion float in 1997.

Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • decision The bookrunners now have to choose a lower price, a smaller deal or both, after an initial term sheet told investors that indicative offers already exceeded the deal size.
  • constraint With about 58% of Firmus shares expected to be tradable from listing, a lower price does not by itself protect the debut, because existing holders could sell from the first day.
  • contradiction The two reports imply a Maas stake worth either about A$253 million or about A$412 million at A$11, so Maas holders cannot yet measure how far the selloff overshot.
  • precedent Firmus was billed as a landmark for Australia's subdued capital markets, so a cut price would be the figure the next large ASX listing gets measured against.

Emanuel Ajay Datt, managing director of fund manager Datt Group, put a figure on the damage the same day. A cut in Firmus's offer price to A$9 from A$11 would reduce the value of Maas's holding by about A$75 million, he said, a loss he called modest next to the fall in Maas's market value [15]. "The selloff reflects a legitimate derating of the embedded value of its Firmus stake, but the magnitude is overdone," Datt said [14].

His ratio extends past A$9. A$75 million over a two-dollar cut is A$37.5 million of stake value per dollar of offer price, so the reported A$8.25, a 25% cut [22], would take about A$103 million off the holding [23]. Maas lost about A$517 million by the close [6], roughly five times that [24]. On the same ratio the entire holding was worth about A$412 million at the full A$11 [25], some A$105 million less than Maas shed in one session [26].

The two reports disagree on what Firmus is worth, though both point the same way for Maas. If the 3.2% stake [1] is measured on the same share base, Datt's ratio implies Firmus equity of about A$12.9 billion at A$11 [29]. Crypto Briefing reported that Firmus set out to list at a $5.5 billion valuation at that price [7], about A$7.9 billion at the exchange rate in the Reuters report carried by CNA [30]. A 3.2% stake at that valuation is about A$253 million [31]. Neither report gives the share count that would settle it.

That leaves three readings of the excess. Datt's is that the market overshot and some of the loss comes back. A second is that investors priced something beyond the stake, since Maas's main business is construction services [20]. The ASX questioned Maas over the plunge. Maas said speculation about the IPO had weighed on sentiment and that it knew of no undisclosed information to explain the trading [13]. A third is that holders expect Firmus to trade below whatever price it sets once its large day-one float is free to sell [19].

I think the third reading carries the most weight. Reuters set the deal against a sharp shift in sentiment towards AI in recent weeks [10], but the objections investors gave were about Firmus itself. Some potential investors told Reuters they were wary of its valuation, its ability to deliver its growth plans and its debt [4], and overseas demand came in weaker than expected, the reports said [5]. Portfolio manager Jun Bei Liu called the offering polarizing and pointed to the gap between early international interest and firm commitments, according to Crypto Briefing [8]. Buyers were being asked to pay for a company running two data centres, with more under development in Australia and Singapore [18].

Final details were still being worked out on Thursday, according to a person familiar with the matter [9], and Firmus did not respond to Reuters [17]. The counter-case is Datt's, and it can be tested. If Firmus prices at A$8.25 or better and holds that level after listing, the stake accounts for about a fifth of Maas's loss [27], and the rest of the A$517 million should come back.

What to watch

  • The final price and size the joint bookrunners announce, and whether the price lands at A$8.25, A$9 or higher.
  • Firmus's first sessions of trading once about 58% of its shares can sell; a price held at or above the offer would support Datt's view that the Maas selloff was overdone.
  • Any Maas disclosure of its Firmus share count or of other work tied to Firmus; either would show how much of the A$517 million the stake explains.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence60
Adoption
Insufficient
Hype gap+20
Incentives50
Confidence55
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    Investor concerns that Nvidia-backed Firmus may cut the size of its $5 billion Australian IPO drove a 30% plunge in shares of Maas Group, which owns 3.2% of the AI data centre operator.

    ReportedSupported2 sources— create a free account to open themView cited source
  2. [2]

    Bookbuilding closed on Thursday and potential investors were told in a term sheet that 'the joint active bookrunners will provide further information in relation to the offer.'

    ReportedSupported2 sources— create a free account to open themView cited source
  3. [3]

    The deal's initial term sheet said indicative offers for the IPO were already above the deal's size.

    ReportedSupported2 sources— create a free account to open themView cited source

Sources

2 independent publishers whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. channelnewsasia.com

    1 article · October 8, 2026

    Firmus investor stock falls after reports AI data centre operator may cut $5 billion IPO
  2. cryptobriefing.com

    1 article · October 8, 2026

    Nvidia-backed Firmus IPO stumbles as demand fades, exposing cracks in AI funding

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Create a free account to composeSign in

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Topics

Entities

Loading related stories