Skip to content

Security Not yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher 2 min read Published

Orphan-free quote references place the Love Electric sample inside a production database

A forum seller wants $600 for what they say are 877,000 EV salary sacrifice driver records, and the 999-row sample published as proof holds up under structural testing in ways a fabricated file usually does not.

The Watch · Security desk

How we use AI Send a correction

Photograph accompanying Orphan-free quote references place the Love Electric sample inside a production database
Photo: securityaffairs.com

What happened

  • A forum seller using the name seraphims offered 877,000 Love Electric driver records for $600 in cryptocurrency, price negotiable, in a listing posted on August 26.
  • The free sample is a 999-row CSV with 24 columns, named in a way that indicates an export of a dbo.drivers table from a Microsoft SQL Server database.
  • Ransomnews counted 731 primary drivers against exactly 731 distinct quote IDs, one primary per quote, with all 268 additional named drivers pointing at quotes present in the file.
  • The consent flag governing National Insurance processing is populated for every one of the 731 primary drivers and empty for all 268 additional drivers, and NI numbers appear on primary rows only.
  • Love Electric Financial Services Limited is an Edinburgh salary sacrifice administrator and FCA-regulated credit broker, listed at Companies House as active Scottish company SC374952.

Why it matters

  • exposure The people at risk are exposed through a vendor their employer chose, and the broker holds the payroll-grade combination that makes employer-side impersonation workable rather than just a mailing list.
  • cost At a fraction of a cent per record the buyer's economics survive even if the count is inflated, so a set priced this low circulates and gets recopied rather than being resold once to one party.
  • decision Love Electric has to size this from its own tables and access logs; adopting the seller's total as the incident boundary means notifying the wrong population in one direction or the other.
  • precedent Referential-integrity testing on a published sample is becoming the cheap first pass on any breach claim, because it settles provenance without waiting on the victim or touching its systems.

Fabricated breach databases usually fail on relationships rather than on fields, which is why Ransomnews went at the join columns before anything else [17]. Any generator can emit a plausible name, a postcode and a National Insurance number. Few reproduce the invariants an application enforced on the way in.

The driving licence field carries its own internal check. Of the 108 full-length licence numbers in the sample, Ransomnews reports 98.1% had a surname block matching the surname stored in the same record, 97.2% matched on first initial, and 78.7% encoded a date of birth matching the stored one [15]. That last figure is roughly 85 rows where two separately stored fields agree [18]. Only 108 of the 287 rows carrying a licence number were full length, 37.6% [23].

Sparseness pushes the same way. Around 71% of rows lack a name, address or city, 74% have no phone number, and 85% have no NI number [13]. The 147 NI numbers present reach a fifth of the 731 rows permitted to hold them, 20.1% [22]. Of those 147, only 53% match the HMRC format [16], so about 78 conform and 69 do not [19]. Licence numbers run to several lengths and phone numbers appear in three formats [16]. Synthetic sets are tidier than that.

The distribution fits a Scottish-registered administrator's employer base. Postcodes cluster on Edinburgh and central Scotland with records running into England, and dates of birth span 1946 to 1999, concentrated on people born in the 1970s and 1980s [14].

None of that validates 877,000. The examined sample is 0.114% of the claimed total, one row in 878 [20]. Public: the listing and the CSV. Seller's assertion: everything behind it. Love Electric had not commented when Security Affairs published [4], and Ransomnews itself flags the total as unverified [3].

Price frames the rest. $600 across 877,000 records works out at 0.068 cents each, about 1,461 records per dollar [21]. Nobody paying that audits a row count. The schema is what carries cost downstream: name, date of birth, address, postcode, NI number and licence number in one row [10], held by a salary sacrifice administrator because the scheme requires it to identify employees and support tax and insurance handling [12].

What to watch

  • A statement from Love Electric, and whether it puts its own figure on the number of drivers involved.
  • A full copy surfacing on the forum or a mirror, which would let anyone test the 877,000 claim against more than 999 rows.
  • A repost or price cut on the listing, which would indicate the set has not moved at $600.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence58
Adoption22
Hype gap+20
Incentives62
Confidence55
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    A seller using the name "seraphims" claimed on August 26, on an English-language data-breach forum, to have obtained the driver database of Love Electric, a UK electric-vehicle salary sacrifice broker.

    Reported Supported Source: securityaffairs.comView cited source
  2. [2]

    The seller offered 877,000 records for $600 in cryptocurrency, with the price negotiable.

    Reported Supported Source: securityaffairs.comView cited source
  3. [3]

    Ransomnews researchers examined the 999-row sample published with the listing and found strong evidence it came from a genuine production database, while the claimed 877,000 records remain unverified.

    Reported Supported Source: Ransomnews, via securityaffairs.comView cited source

Get this ledger inside ChatGPT. Ask about any of our stories and the answer brings its figure, each claim’s verdict and the sources. Free, no account.

Add to ChatGPTAdd to Claude

Sources

1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. securityaffairs.com

    1 article · August 28, 2026

    Love Electric Breach: 877,000 Driver Records Offered for $600

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Topics

  • Breach Sample VerificationFollow
  • EV Salary Sacrifice SchemesFollow
  • UK Data Protection ExposureFollow
  • Third-Party Supplier RiskFollow
  • Stolen Data MarketsFollow
Loading related stories