A lapsed operating agreement does not switch off a pole-mounted camera. Cmdr. Randy Goddard told the Police Commission that the images are still going into Flock's cloud and that LAPD investigators could reach them later if a new contract is finalised [5]. During the gap, the only thing the department turned off was its own reading of the feed.
The inspector general's audit gives the scale of what keeps accruing. Flock cameras scanned more than 210 million plates over two months starting last August [14], which works out to roughly 3.4 million scans a day [1]. In the same window, 337 alerts led to the recovery of a stolen vehicle [16], and 161 plates flagged as stolen turned out to be wrong, though the report says not every one of those produced a police intervention [15]. That is about one erroneous stolen-vehicle flag for every two recoveries [2].
What is being renegotiated is not the hardware or the hit rate. Under the proposed language, the LAPD would own "every image, every record, all metadata" captured on the cameras [6]. Flock would be barred from selling, publishing, disclosing or sharing that data with any outside entity, and from using it to train artificial intelligence or for other commercial purposes [7]. Any breach would have to be reported to the city in writing within 24 hours [8]. Those clauses are the differentiator now, and they exist because the criticism of Flock was about downstream sharing with state and federal agencies, which detractors link to the Trump administration's immigration enforcement [21].
The awkward part sits one line further down in the same audit. Barragan's report found the department has no formal contracts or agreements with Axon and Motorola addressing ALPR data security, privacy and access control [13], and that its existing agreements with all three vendors lack clear language on retention and third-party sharing [17]. The vendor that drew the political heat is the one that ends up contractually bound; the two that did not keep operating on nothing much.
Flock says it works with roughly 5,000 law enforcement agencies and that its technology complies with the California law limiting what can be shared with federal authorities [11]. It also sent the department its own suggested changes to the draft on Monday, according to LAPD chief information officer Dean Gialamas [9], and did not respond to the Los Angeles Times before publication [10]. Whatever survives that markup, not the press release, is the policy.
Dozens of mostly smaller agencies have simply cut Flock off [20]. Los Angeles is testing the other route: keep the tool, and make the terms carry the safeguards. Chief Jim McDonnell's line about a "valuable investigative tool" that must be handled "responsibly" [18] is being converted into contract clauses, which is where it can be enforced or quietly traded away.
