Skip to content

ScienceNot yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher2 min readPublished

Lancet Commission names malicious AI and nuclear conflict as extinction-potential health threats

Lancet Commission experts modeled 17 global health threats through 2100 and rated two, malicious AI and nuclear conflict, as carrying extinction potential. Obesity leads on avoidable burden at 23.1 billion disability-adjusted life-years, the gap between best and worst case by 2100.

The Scientist · Science desk

How we use AISend a correction

Illustration accompanying Lancet Commission names malicious AI and nuclear conflict as extinction-potential health threats
Generated illustration
Obesity leads major risks on avoidable burden Disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), Lancet Commission estimates. Obesity's figure is the gap between best- and worst-case scenarios by 2100.

Obesity's estimated avoidable burden, the gap between best- and worst-case scenarios by 2100: 23.1 billion DALYs. 15 catastrophic risks each carry more than 1 billion avoidable DALYs. Baseline forecast of total disease and injury burden, 2025 to 2100: an estimated 246 billion DALYs.

Obesity leads major risks on avoidable burden
FigureValueNoteClaim
Obesity: estimated avoidable burden by 210023.1 billion DALYs7
Catastrophic risks, each over 1 billion avoidable DALYs15 risksafter malicious AI, nuclear conflict4
Estimated total burden, baseline forecast246 billion DALYsdisease and injury, 2025 to 21009

What happened

  • The researchers modeled how much death and disability could be avoided for each threat between 2025 and 2100, counted in disability-adjusted life-years, or DALYs.
  • Beyond the two extinction cases, 15 more threats each carry more than 1 billion potentially avoidable DALYs between now and 2100.
  • Asteroid strikes and supervolcano eruptions were discounted because of their very low probability of occurring this century.

Why it matters

  • constraint Each threat's burden was calculated on its own and overlaps in people who carry several risks, so the 17 estimates cannot be summed into one figure.
  • decision Preparedness budgets have to weigh obesity's chronic gap against two threats the commission calls special cases of low probability.
  • exposure None of the commission's estimates covers mirror life, if it were ever built.

The commission's reference unit is COVID-19, and the conversion is simple. One billion disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) is equivalent to two pandemics, the researchers write [5], so one pandemic is 0.5 billion [18]. At that rate the obesity gap comes to 46 pandemics [7], and the 246 billion baseline for 2025 to 2100 comes to roughly 490, which the researchers round to 500 [9][20]. Obesity's gap is also about 23 times the 1-billion cutoff that put each of the 15 threats on the list [19].

Two cautions come with the units. For obesity, the figure is the difference between best- and worst-case scenarios by 2100 [7]. That bounds what is avoidable inside the model. It does not show how much of the gap any particular budget closes.

The education estimate also rests partly on demography. Higher educational attainment is projected to reduce disease burden both by improving health and by slowing population growth [8]. Some of the avoided burden therefore comes from there being fewer people to carry it.

Christopher JL Murray, a physician and health economist at the University of Washington who co-chairs the commission, framed the findings this way: "The striking finding is not only the scale of these threats, but that humanity still has the agency to act," he said [15][16]. A later remark is the better guide to reading the list. "Some are already imposing substantial health burdens today, while others carry a real danger if they materialize," Murray said [17].

In our view that sentence describes two kinds of entry. Many of the 15 are conditions already imposing burdens, such as smoking and air pollution [6]. DALY counts fit that kind well. The two extinction cases are rated low probability [3], and neither has a DALY figure in the coverage available.

The researchers also stress that the threats are interconnected, and that solving them calls for a long-term, multi-faceted approach that does not simply combat problems in isolation [13]. Their recommendations include building and funding threat-ready health systems and dramatically increasing investment in breakthrough innovation [14].

What to watch

  • The full commission report, for the best- and worst-case scenario definitions behind each threat's avoidable-DALY gap.
  • Any published DALY estimate for malicious AI or nuclear conflict, the two extinction-potential cases.
  • Whether any government budget adopts the recommendation to build and fund threat-ready health systems.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence55
Adoption
Insufficient
Hype gap+20
Incentives
Insufficient
Confidence50
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    In an international assessment published in The Lancet, a team of dozens of scientific experts cataloged 17 major global health threats faced by humanity this century.

    ReportedSupportedSource: The Lancet Commission on 21st Century Global Threats to Health, as reported by ScienceAlertView cited source
  2. [2]

    The researchers used modeling to estimate how much death and disability could potentially be avoided for each threat between 2025 and 2100, measured in disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs).

    ReportedSupportedSource: Lancet Commission researchers, as reported by ScienceAlertView cited source
  3. [3]

    Two threats were rated as carrying 'extinction potential' for humanity between now and 2100, despite their ultimately low probability: malicious AI, including using AI to create new bioweapons, and nuclear conflict with nuclear famine.

    ReportedSupportedSource: Lancet Commission researchers, in their report as quoted by ScienceAlertView cited source

Sources

1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. sciencealert.com

    1 article · October 12, 2026

    Experts Identified The Gravest Health Threats Facing Humanity – Two Have 'Extinction Potential'

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Topics

Entities

Loading related stories