Skip to content

Product Not yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher 2 min read Published

Insurers cannot write $10bn of cover for data center GPUs, Parametrix CEO says

Parametrix CEO Jonathan Hatzor says the insurance market cannot provide $10bn of property cover for a data center's GPUs. S&P Global Ratings says demand could generate $10bn in new premiums in 2026, yet owners must price what insurers will not carry.

The Product Desk

Send a correction

Illustration accompanying Insurers cannot write $10bn of cover for data center GPUs, Parametrix CEO says
Generated illustration
S&P says insurable data center assets could double S&P's Delpuech says the insurable data center asset base could double in six to seven years at average annual investment of $300 billion.

Three figures: S&P's Delpuech estimates an insurable data center asset base of over $2 trillion and average annual investments of $300 billion; DCD says hyperscaler capex is forecast to reach $700bn in 2026.

S&P says insurable data center assets could double
FigureValueNoteClaim
Insurable data center asset base, over, per S&P$2 trillion2
Average annual investment$300 billion3
Hyperscaler capex forecast$700bn in 20266

What happened

  • Hyperscaler capex is forecast to reach $700bn in 2026, and those spenders are looking to external funding sources.
  • S&P's Charles-Marie Delpuech says those outside investors may require high insured limits, to protect assets or cash flows such as rental income.
  • Hatzor says there is no historical example of insuring a property with $10bn of equipment inside it.
  • DCD's analysis says the slow-moving insurance market is struggling to keep up with data center growth.

Why it matters

  • Who's exposed exposure Lenders and equity investors funding GPU purchases at this scale may hold collateral that no insurer will cover in full.
  • What it limits constraint Cover for GPU-heavy sites depends on loss records that do not exist yet, so limits are likely to trail construction.
  • What doesn't add up contradiction S&P's premium figure counts what demand could generate, while Parametrix says supply is short.
  • Who has to decide decision Sponsors have to decide, exposure by exposure, how much loss they will carry themselves and put that in the financing model.

Take the case Parametrix CEO Jonathan Hatzor described: a debt provider or investor puts up $10bn, as loan or equity, to buy GPUs for a data center project [16]. Hatzor said: "It's not just because we're dinosaurs or because insurance companies are very old, there's just no historical records of how resilient those GPUs are." [18]

The pitch for the sector is near-guaranteed returns and stable rent-based cash flows, in a market DCD describes as growing globally at a 14 percent CAGR [11]. DCD says those building and running data centers, reluctant to miss out, are "leaving themselves somewhat exposed to new avenues of loss and risk" [9]. Hatzor describes the other side of that trade: "But in data centers, we still see a lot of demand but not enough supply of insurance, which is also increasing the entire risk factor." [14]

The exposure being added is large. S&P Global Ratings analyst Charles-Marie Delpuech estimates the insurable asset base at over $2 trillion [2]. He said that on average annual investments of $300 billion, "this asset base could double in six to seven years" [3]. Against a $2 trillion base, $300 billion a year is up to about 15 percent annual growth [13]. S&P sets its $10bn premium estimate beside global aviation, which takes in around $5 billion a year [5], so the data center figure is twice that [12].

DCD names three pressures on owners: high uptime standards, uncertainty around AI returns, and the threat of destruction from enemies and saboteurs [10]. Parametrix sells service-level agreement insurance for data centers [8]. DCD's analysis does not size the shortfall for outage, AI-return or sabotage risk. The one sized case is Hatzor's GPU loan, which he offered as an example.

We think that until a broker puts a number in writing, the gap should be carried as the owner's own risk. Sponsors can run the test on one page. It lists the three exposures and, beside each, the limit the lender or investor requires and the limit a broker will quote in writing. The difference is retained risk, and it belongs in the model as a reserve. An exposure with no written quote is retained in full.

What to watch

  • Whether S&P, DCD or an insurer publishes a figure for the shortfall in cover for outage, AI-return or sabotage risk.
  • Whether any insurer writes a single property limit near $10bn for a GPU-filled site, which Hatzor says has no precedent.
  • Whether hyperscaler capex reaches the forecast $700bn in 2026 and brings the external funders Delpuech expects to ask for high insured limits.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence45
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+25
Incentives60
Confidence50
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    DCD says the slow-moving insurance markets are struggling to keep up with data center growth.

    Reported Supported Source: DCD analysis, 'Ensuring uptime, insuring downtime'View cited source
  2. [2]

    Charles-Marie Delpuech, insurance analyst at S&P Global Ratings, estimates a total insurable asset base of over $2 trillion in the data center sector.

    Reported Supported Source: Charles-Marie Delpuech, S&P Global RatingsView cited source
  3. [3]

    Delpuech said: 'Based on our projection and average annual investments of $300 billion, this asset base could double in six to seven years.'

    Reported Supported Source: Charles-Marie Delpuech, S&P Global RatingsView cited source

Get this ledger inside ChatGPT. Ask about any of our stories and the answer brings its figure, each claim’s verdict and the sources. Free, no account.

Add to ChatGPTAdd to Claude

Sources

1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. datacenterdynamics.com

    1 article · October 15, 2026

    Ensuring uptime, insuring downtime

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Topics

Entities

Loading related stories