Skip to content

Science1 publisher2 min readPublished

Confidence that US votes are counted as intended has fallen 22 points since the 2024 election

UC San Diego's election center puts confidence in the national vote count at 55%, down from 77% just after the 2024 election. The fall since January has been steepest among independents.

The Scientist · Science desk

Illustration accompanying Confidence that US votes are counted as intended has fallen 22 points since the 2024 election

What happened

  • In a UC San Diego survey of 5,016 adults taken Sept. 1-9, 49% said they expect the November 2026 elections to be free and fair, 23% said they do not, and 28% said they did not know.
  • Confidence that votes nationwide had been counted as intended was 77% immediately after the 2024 presidential election, 60% by January 2026 and 55% in the September wave.
  • Independents' confidence in the count fell eight points between January and September, from 57% to 49%, while Democratic confidence was essentially unchanged at 63%.
  • More than three-quarters of Americans, 76%, said they are concerned that misleading AI audio or video deepfakes will affect the 2026 midterms.
  • Seventy-one percent favor banning election officials from betting on elections through prediction markets, and support held even among respondents who bet on Polymarket and Kalshi themselves.

Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • contradiction The across-party reading fits the whole arc since 2024, because the January wave found all three partisan groups down; the last eight months moved Republicans and independents while Democrats held.
  • constraint The tracking measures belief about the count, not counting accuracy, and this series does not link a change in ballot handling to trust, so an official who tightens ballot handling has no reading here.
  • exposure The undecided bloc on the free-and-fair question is five points larger than the outright no. Uncertainty is the biggest share available to move before November.
  • decision Federal action to limit mail voting would meet an electorate where 53% of Republicans and 19% of Democrats distrust mail counting, so one national rule cannot answer both blocs' doubts.

The fall since the 2024 election totals 22 points, and 17 of them were gone before the January 2026 survey [1][2]. The remaining five came between January and September [3]. Averaged across each interval, confidence dropped about 1.2 points a month in the 14 months to January and about 0.6 a month in the eight months since [5].

The second leg is not spread evenly across the electorate. Republican confidence went from 65% to 58% over those eight months, a seven-point move [6][3]. The account of the survey does not report a margin of error [18], so the one-point Democratic change cannot be separated from sampling noise. UC San Diego calls the independent decline the particularly pronounced one [4].

Thad Kousser, a professor of political science at UC San Diego, co-directs the Center for Transparent and Trusted Elections. "Democrats, Republicans and independents all express doubts, although what drives those doubts can be very different," he said [9]. The center's January survey had already documented the decline in all three partisan groups [7].

Respondents also named reasons for their distrust. Forty-four percent pointed to the way congressional district lines are drawn, 41% to whether US elections are protected against foreign interference, and 39% to whether voting technology is protected against cyberattacks [13]. A single cross-sectional survey cannot assign the 22-point fall to any of them. Those answers were collected in the same interview as the confidence question.

Concern about AI runs in the same direction in every partisan group. Asked whether AI will be mostly beneficial or mostly harmful in the midterms, Republicans chose harmful by 2.6 to 1, Democrats by 3.4 to 1 and independents by 4.1 to 1 [11]. Lauren Prather is the center's other co-director and an associate professor at UC San Diego's School of Global Policy and Strategy. "Our findings show broad concern about AI-generated misinformation and foreign interference, even among voters who may disagree strongly about other aspects of how elections are conducted," she said [14].

The center reports these views as firmly held: 89% of respondents said they were at least moderately certain about their level of confidence [8]. That threshold puts the moderately certain in with the highly certain, so it does not show how many respondents hold their view strongly.

What to watch

  • The center's post-November wave, and whether independents return toward the 57% they reported in January.
  • Whether any state or federal body adopts a conduct rule barring election officials from trading on Polymarket or Kalshi.
  • Publication of the full instrument, including whether the free-and-fair question offered a 'don't know' option or recorded volunteered ones.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories