Skip to content

ProductIndependently confirmed3 publishers3 min readPublished

Facebook Feed and Reels now take plain-language instructions on what to show more or less

Meta is extending its natural-language Your Algorithm control from Instagram to Facebook Feed and Reels. Users can tell the ranking system what they want more or less of, and Meta says recommendations change in real time.

The Product Desk

How we use AISend a correction

Photograph accompanying Facebook Feed and Reels now take plain-language instructions on what to show more or less
Photo: techcrunch.com

What happened

  • Facebook's three-dot menu on individual posts now links to Your Algorithm and carries the Interested and Not interested options.
  • Meta says the system may ask follow-up questions to understand what a user liked or disliked about a post.
  • Instagram got Your Algorithm for Reels in December 2025, then extended it across Feed and Explore in June.
  • Meta also says it is using LLMs more in its ranking systems. Those models are what let the system read instructions written in plain words.

Why it matters

  • decision Pages and Reels publishers now face audiences who can ask for less of a topic in a sentence, and that is a new input to any Facebook distribution plan.
  • contradiction TechCrunch describes users writing preferences in their own words, while The Verge describes tapping interested or not interested on topics. Meta's material covers both, so a rollout plan has to say which one it means.
  • precedent Three Meta apps now carry a version of the control, and we'd expect product teams outside Meta to be asked why their feeds take no instructions in words.

Take a Reels viewer who gets a fourth clip on a topic they have had enough of. Meta now gives them two ways to answer. They can tap "Not interested", and The Verge reports that button may also appear directly under posts [4]. Or they can say, in their own words, what they want less of [2].

These are different tools, and the pitch blurs them. Meta says LLMs are "unlocking an algorithm you can actually talk to" and that recommendations respond "in real time, adapting within the same session to reflect what matters to you right now" [6]. What the screen offers is a menu entry, two buttons and optional follow-up questions [3][5]. A button takes one tap. A sentence takes effort, and we think the follow-up questions exist because some of those sentences will be vague.

The testable part of the promise is "within the same session". A user can write an instruction, keep scrolling and see in one sitting whether the topic thins out. If it does not, the user finds that out in the same sitting.

Neither report includes usage figures from Instagram, where the control already exists, and neither says how a stated preference is weighed against what a person actually watches [8]. Meta's stated goal is more relevant recommendations [11]. Count second uses of the control and whether the unwanted topic thins. Time spent scrolling afterward measures something else.

We think the sentence box suits a user who can name the annoyance, and the buttons suit one who can only point at a post.

For a team deciding whether to build the same thing, two tests sort the decision. The first is whether the feed visibly changes inside the session. The second is whether the user can see what the system understood. A feature that passes both is a control. One that changes the feed but hides what it understood is a guess that looks like a control, and its cost arrives as tickets from people who asked for less of something and still see it. If it shows what it understood but the feed does not change, it is a survey, and if it does neither, it is a suggestion box.

On Meta's own account, Facebook's version passes the first test, and the follow-up questions are its only stated attempt at the second [5][6]. We would call it a control on the first axis and unconfirmed on the second until someone measures it. If you build your own, we'd ship the one-tap version first and add the free-text box only when you can show the result inside the session, because a free-text box promises more than a button does and every miss is then visible to the person who typed it.

What to watch

  • Whether Meta publishes usage or retention figures for Your Algorithm from Instagram or Facebook.
  • Whether Meta says how a typed preference is weighed against viewing history in Facebook ranking.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence40
Adoption
Insufficient
Hype gap
Insufficient
Incentives
Insufficient
Confidence65
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    Meta announced on Tuesday the launch of its "Your Algorithm" feature on Facebook, a feature it first launched on Instagram.

  2. [2]

    The tool allows Facebook users to influence the content they see in Feed and Reels by describing their preferences in their own words using natural language.

  3. [3]

    Facebook's three-dot menu has been updated; by opening it users can access "Your Algorithm" or select "Interested" and "Not interested" options for individual posts.

Sources

3 independent publishers whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. about.fb.com

    1 article · October 13, 2026

    Your Algorithm, Your Words: New Ways to Shape What You See on Facebook
  2. techcrunch.com

    1 article · October 13, 2026

    Facebook is giving users more control over their algorithm
  3. theverge.com

    1 article · October 13, 2026

    Facebook will let you customize your feed algorithm using AI

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Topics

  • LLMs in ranking systemsFollow
  • Social media recommendation algorithmsFollow
Loading related stories