Science1 publisher2 min readPublished
Joordens and Schagatay put breath-hold diving before running in the origin of human endurance
The forthcoming PaleoAnthropology paper argues that pacing oxygen across repeated shallow dives built the cardiorespiratory stamina later used for running, with a two-hour recording of one Ama diver's shift supplying the measurements.
The Scientist · Science desk

What happened
- Josephine Joordens and Erika Schagatay propose a "dive first, run later" hypothesis for human aerobic endurance, built from comparative physiology, anatomy, paleoecology and paleoanthropology, in a study to be published in PaleoAnthropology.
- They define endurance diving as repeated dives with short breathing pauses at a regular pace, the working pattern of modern freediving populations such as the Japanese Ama and the Sama-Bajau.
- A two-hour time-depth recording of one Ama diver's shift logged 50 dives to depths of around 8 to 10 meters, with 45 percent of the time spent underwater.
- The pair do not dismiss the endurance running hypothesis, arguing instead that the origin of human stamina cannot be understood from land-based foraging alone.
- The study claims to be the first to place the physiological overlap between breath-hold diving ability and high-altitude tolerance in a human evolutionary context.
Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
- constraint Physiology measured in living divers cannot rank diving ahead of running in time. Fossils and reconstructed near-shore habitats have to settle the sequence in the hypothesis.
- capability Because the ancestral trait proposed here is oxygen pacing under repeated hypoxia, it can be instrumented in living freedivers, so the argument has an experimental arm as well as a fossil one.
- decision Anyone who teaches pursuit hunting as the textbook account of human stamina now has to decide whether to present a diving-first sequence beside it, and say which parts of the running case they still treat as sufficient.
- precedent With a named alternative in a journal, the next round of papers on hominin locomotion is likely to address diving as well as running.
A diver who is at the surface for only half of a working period has to take in twice as much air while she can, and has to hold effort below the point where lactate accumulates [11]. Sustaining that takes respiratory and cardiovascular capacity plus the ability to pace breathing and breath-holding [11]. Joordens and Schagatay argue that this pacing ability could have started the evolution of the cardiorespiratory stamina that long-distance running requires [12]. "When studying the origin of human endurance and the evolutionary history of the Homo sapiens lineage, it is imperative to take not only endurance running, but also endurance diving for food, into account," they argue [3].
The measurements behind that pattern come from one working shift. Fifty dives in 120 minutes is one dive every 2.4 minutes [17]; 45 percent of two hours is 54 minutes underwater [18]; spread across the dives, that is roughly 65 seconds below the surface each time against about 79 seconds on it [19]. "This diving method enables individuals to work underwater for hours each day while holding their breath," said Schagatay, a professor of animal physiology whose work covers human performance in hypoxic environments [8]. One trace from one diver cannot show how a population of them works. What it does show is that the pattern is sustainable in a trained modern freediver.
High bone mass appears in many hominin fossils, and the authors reinterpret it as an adaptation to diving in shallow water [15]. The fossil record bears on that claim directly.
The comparison most open to testing is the altitude one. Breath-hold diving and high-altitude living both impose low oxygen; the diving response conserves oxygen during a dive, and a trait such as a large spleen can raise blood oxygen content in both settings [13].
Bramble and Lieberman's 2004 hypothesis derived long legs, effective cooling mechanisms and increased aerobic capacity from hunting terrestrial prey over long distances [4]. Humans are unusual among primates in being capable endurance runners as well as strong long-distance swimmers and skilled breath-hold divers [20]. "Our study provides a balanced land-and-water perspective on human evolution," said Joordens, a professor of hominin paleoecology and evolution [9]. A synthesis of existing comparative evidence does not weigh the energetic returns of the two activities against each other. What it can do is propose a sequence. "A combination of land-based foraging and foraging in water close to the shore by shallow diving could have shaped the multifaceted humans we are today," she said [10].
What to watch
- Publication in PaleoAnthropology, and whether the full paper lists skeletal predictions beyond high bone mass that could falsify the diving sequence.
- A direct comparison of diving response and spleen data between freediving populations and highland populations, which the study frames as physiologically parallel.
- Published responses from researchers working on the endurance running hypothesis, including whether they accept the incompleteness claim.