Skip to content

Science1 publisher3 min readPublished

Emissions released since 2015 warmed Europe's hottest week every year since 2021, a GRL study finds

Attribution science usually asks what two centuries of fossil fuel burning did to a heat wave. A Stanford group asked what the ten years since the Paris Agreement did, and found a measurable answer in Europe's worst recent heat.

The Scientist · Science desk

Illustration accompanying Emissions released since 2015 warmed Europe's hottest week every year since 2021, a GRL study finds

What happened

  • A study published Sept. 22 in Geophysical Research Letters finds that greenhouse gases emitted since the 2015 Paris Agreement have intensified Europe's recent heat waves.
  • Lead author Jared Trok reports the finding is not confined to the 2025 event but holds for Europe's hottest week in every individual year since at least 2021.
  • The authors put the chance that this decade's emissions intensified Europe's deadly June 2025 heat wave at better than 99%.
  • The team used generative AI trained on climate models to test whether subsets of all human-caused emissions influenced specific recent weather events.

Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • constraint Co-author Noah Diffenbaugh's point is that every remaining pathway, including the most optimistic timelines, adds more emissions than the post-Paris decade did, so this kind of intensification runs through a period of successful policy.
  • exposure The quantity exposed is European heat mortality: earlier work by the same authors found that small temperature increases raise heat-death risk disproportionately, so a fraction of a degree does not translate into a proportionate fraction of harm.
  • decision Anyone sizing heat plans or grid margins to the 2025 event is designing to a case the study expects to be exceeded. The design year changes even for planners who assume emissions targets are met.

The cooler version of June 2025 exists only inside a model. The week itself happened once, in a world that already held a decade of post-Paris emissions, so the comparison is between an observed event and a generated one [2]. The Stanford group extended a method it published in 2024 to run that comparison for a single slice of human emissions, the part released since 2015 [19].

Jared Trok, a doctoral student in Earth system science at the Stanford Doerr School of Sustainability, described the core difficulty in statistical terms [22]. "It's a signal-to-noise issue," Trok said. "The role of random, natural variability in specific weather events is large, which makes it difficult to detect the influence from a small amount of human emissions." [12]

Two numbers come out of the comparison, and they answer different questions. The probability, above 99% for the June 2025 event, is about direction: the decade's emissions made that week hotter than it would otherwise have been [5]. The magnitude is roughly a third of a degree Celsius, and it applies to average daily temperatures in some regions [6]. It is not the peak of the hottest afternoon, and it is not a global-mean figure of the sort the Paris targets are written in [8].

Heat killed several thousand people across Europe in 2025, and June that year was the hottest observed in the region until heat waves broke the record in 2026 [10]. "That third of a degree temperature change may seem small," Trok said, "but a large body of literature shows that small changes in temperature can have meaningful impacts on the damages caused by those extreme weather events." [11] Another study found that changes in daily temperature have disproportionate impacts on electricity demand, mortality rates, agricultural yields and labor productivity across the United States [16].

Almost one-fifth of all carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels has been released in the decade since the Paris Agreement was adopted, most of it from oil, natural gas and coal [7]. Attribution work has generally run against the whole record since the mid-19th century [20]. Ten years is about 6% of that roughly 170-year span, so the tested window is short in time and heavy in carbon [21]. That is where a decade-scale signal would be easiest to find.

Noah Diffenbaugh, a co-author and professor at the Stanford Doerr School of Sustainability, stated the forward claim directly [22]. "This study highlights that we can expect the kinds of extreme heat waves we've been experiencing recently to intensify even more in the coming years," he said [14].

Several thousand lawsuits are underway seeking to hold oil companies and other fossil fuel producers accountable for loss and damage caused by extreme weather linked to global warming [17]. This study isolates a date range, and those suits need a producer. Its authors describe attributing specific damages from specific weather events to subsets of human-caused emissions as challenging [18].

What to watch

  • Whether the same counterfactual is run on the June 2026 heat waves that broke the 2025 European record.
  • Whether attribution keyed to a dated emissions window appears in any of the loss-and-damage suits against fossil fuel producers.
  • Whether the AI emulator's counterfactuals for these events are reproduced by conventional climate-model attribution.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories