Product1 publisher3 min readPublished
DOE puts $1 million into Penn State chemistry on three fission products that hamper molten-salt reactors
Penn State's team won $1 million from the Department of Energy to track samarium, europium and tellurium in molten salt reactors and recycling systems. The money pays for lab measurement of how those elements behave in salt, the step any recycling or corrosion fix has to start from.
The Product Desk · Product desk
Drafted by a language model from the sources cited here and checked against its claim ledger before publication. How we use AISend a correction

What happened
- Molten salt reactors use liquid salts in place of pressurized water and can extract more energy from fuel and recycle used material, but their internal chemistry is harsh.
- According to the researchers, samarium and europium are undesirable in recycled fuel since they can get in the way of both how the reactor performs and the recycling process.
- Working with the University of Nevada, Reno and Idaho National Laboratory, the team will study the elements during pyroprocessing, a high-temperature molten-salt recycling method.
- Lead investigator Hojong Kim tried to analyze samarium under a 2018 federal grant, but the work stalled because the element was present in tiny amounts and behaved unpredictably.
Compiled by The Product DeskSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
- constraint Molten-salt designs that count on recycled fuel cannot yet specify a separation step for samarium and europium, because the team says it first has to learn how they behave in the salt.
- exposure Tellurium attacks structural metal in reactors and recycling equipment, so how long components last in a molten-salt plant depends on chemistry that is still being measured.
- decision Anyone weighing a molten-salt plan's efficiency or waste figures should treat its recycling assumptions as conditional, since even the project's own payoff depends on these trials succeeding.
- precedent Funding a second attempt at samarium after the 2018 federal effort stalled shows DOE is willing to back an unsolved separations problem again once diagnostics improve.
Alok Pandey's share of the project is a bench routine. The Penn State doctoral researcher will dissolve samarium, europium and tellurium in molten salt solvents. He will run a current through the mixture and vary the applied potential to watch each element change oxidation state [7]. "This will allow us to understand the elements' electrochemical properties," Pandey said. "It could help improve strategies for their recovery and management during nuclear fuel recycling." [8]
Interesting Engineering's account of the award ends much further down the line. If the current trials succeed, it says, the technique could unlock more sustainable fuel cycles. Removing the byproducts would let engineers keep advanced reactors running longer and significantly reduce long-lived nuclear waste [11]. Those are plant-level outcomes. The work actually funded is a voltage sweep in a salt bath, and the researcher running it describes its value with "could help" [8].
Hojong Kim, the lead investigator and a professor of materials science and engineering at Penn State, described where the work starts. "We will study the oxidation states of these elements, which describe how many electrons an atom has gained or lost and strongly influence how they behave chemically," Kim said [5]. The account treats that knowledge as a precondition. To solve the problem, it says, researchers need to understand how these elements behave at a fundamental level [13].
Tellurium's damage lands on hardware. "Tellurium, on the other hand, can react with metals used in molten salt reactors and fuel-recycling systems, contributing to corrosion and materials degradation," the researchers said [4].
This matters most to whoever has to sign off on a molten-salt plan whose efficiency case rests on recycling its own fuel. For that reader, the stage of the work is the useful fact. Measuring oxidation states comes before a separation step. A separation step comes before any efficiency or waste figure that assumes clean recycled fuel. I'd treat a plant claim that skips those steps as a projection. The cost of holding that line is that early designs will look worse on paper than they may turn out to be.
A 2x2 sorts any fission-product claim. One axis is whether the element's behavior in the salt has been characterized under process conditions. The other is whether there is a demonstrated way to remove it or keep it off the metal. The four cells are engineering work (both), a lead (removal route only), a measurement waiting for a process (characterization only) and a research line item (neither).
Samarium sits in the lead cell. Kim's lab previously found that molten bismuth can cleanly capture rare-earth elements out of liquid salts [10], and the account groups samarium with the rare-earth metals [9]. Its behavior, and europium's, is what Pandey's experiments are built to pin down [7]. The account ties bismuth capture to rare earths, and for tellurium it describes the corrosion and stops [4][10].
What to watch
- Published oxidation-state data for samarium in molten salt from Pandey's experiments, the measurement Kim's 2018 attempt could not complete.
- Any removal route for tellurium from the Penn State, Reno and Idaho National Laboratory team, since the bismuth method is described for rare earths.
- Whether bismuth capture works for samarium under pyroprocessing conditions, which would move it from a lead to engineering work.