Skip to content

Science Not yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher 2 min read Published

Tacking minutes onto a duration makes it feel longer, even when the total is shorter

People judged 2 hours and 55 minutes as longer than 3 hours across 10 studies, according to a Journal of Marketing Research paper. Anyone who sets deadlines or lists course lengths can shift how far away time feels, though the procrastination link was not tested directly.

The Scientist · Science desk

Send a correction

Fewer minutes, yet judged longer in 10 studies The two durations people compared, each in minutes, and the participants across the nine experiments behind the finding.

2 hours and 55 minutes is 175 minutes; 3 hours is 180 minutes. People judged the first as longer. Over 6,000 participants took part in nine experiments.

Fewer minutes, yet judged longer in 10 studies
FigureValueNoteClaim
2 hours and 55 minutes, in minutes175 minutes12
3 hours, in minutes180 minutes12
Participants in nine experiments, over6,000 people3

What happened

  • The 10 studies combine nine experiments, with more than 6,000 participants in all, and data drawn from upward of 10,000 online course listings.
  • The proposed mechanism is that people think in the units they are given, so adding minutes brings many small units to mind instead of a few large ones.
  • In one experiment, adding a time of day to the payment date made people less willing to hold out a few days for a bigger payment.
  • In another, people set lower weekly exercise goals when the time was shown as 1 hour and 55 minutes than when it was shown as 2 hours.

Why it matters

  • Who has to decide decision Whoever writes a deadline now chooses between a bare date and a date with a time of day, and the two will not feel equally far away.
  • Who's exposed exposure A specific expiry date on a label made people judge recently expired products as less effective, so label format alone shifts how a lapsed medicine or food is perceived.
  • What it limits constraint No format wins in general: a shorter-feeling time makes a goal look achievable, while a longer-feeling one signals value, as Sirwani says of online courses.

The comparison pair is built to be close. Three hours is 180 minutes and 2 hours and 55 minutes is 175, a gap of 5 minutes, or about 2.8 percent [12]. Anyone counting minutes would call the round figure longer [2].

The paper, "Every Minute Counts: The Added-Unit Effect In Time Perception," is listed under Tatiana Sokolova et al. [11]. The account here comes from Deepak Sirwani, an assistant professor at the UBC Sauder School of Business, in an interview with Phys.org [1]. The thing this doesn't tell you is how far the effect stretches. The interview does not report effect sizes or what happens as the gap widens.

The payment experiment is the nearest the interview comes to a behavioral outcome, and it measures willingness to wait. Whether anyone starts a task sooner or later is a further step, and Sirwani flagged the gap himself. "We did not test procrastination directly, but when a deadline feels farther away, people may be more likely to put things off," he said [13]. We would treat the deadline advice as a hypothesis resting on a measured shift in perceived distance.

The interview also does not say what the 10,000-plus course listings were compared on [3]. We cannot tell whether the course-length result comes from the listings, the experiments, or both.

Delivery windows follow the same pattern. A parcel that arrives "by 4 p.m. on Oct. 17" can feel farther away than one that arrives "by Oct. 17," Sirwani said, even though the first is likely sooner [9].

What to watch

  • Whether the full paper reports effect sizes, and how the effect behaves when the gap between the two durations is an hour rather than 5 minutes.
  • A direct test of procrastination, which Sirwani says was not run, to see if a farther-feeling deadline changes when people start.
  • What the 10,000-plus course listings were compared on, and how learners responded to listed lengths.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence58
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+10
Incentives
Not scored
Confidence62
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    Dr. Deepak Sirwani, a behavioral scientist and assistant professor at the UBC Sauder School of Business, discussed the research in a Q&A; the study is published in the Journal of Marketing Research.

    Reported Supported Source: Phys.org Q&A with Deepak SirwaniView cited source
  2. [2]

    People perceive a duration as longer when it is described with a larger unit plus a smaller unit, such as 2 hours and 55 minutes, than with the larger unit alone, such as 3 hours, even though the latter is longer.

    Reported Supported Source: Deepak Sirwani, Phys.org Q&AView cited source
  3. [3]

    The finding was seen across 10 studies, including data from more than 10,000 online course listings and nine experiments with over 6,000 participants.

    Reported Supported Source: Deepak Sirwani, Phys.org Q&AView cited source

Get this ledger inside ChatGPT. Ask about any of our stories and the answer brings its figure, each claim’s verdict and the sources. Free, no account.

Add to ChatGPTAdd to Claude

Sources

1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. phys.org

    1 article · October 16, 2026

    Changing how you think about time could help you accomplish year-end goals: Q&A

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Topics

Entities

Loading related stories