Skip to content

InvestNot yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher3 min readPublished

Nearly a third of Korea's SME-ministry innovation products have never had a public buyer

Of the 591 products South Korea's SME ministry certified as innovative from 2020 through last year, 186, or 31.5%, have never had a public purchase. On the ministry's own figures, the label produces first orders more reliably than it produces repeat public customers.

The Investor · Invest desk

How we use AISend a correction

Illustration accompanying Nearly a third of Korea's SME-ministry innovation products have never had a public buyer
Generated illustration
186 of 591 products had no public buyer; 194 had a pilot Number of the SME ministry's innovation products, designated 2020 through last year, by public purchase record.

Bar comparison of the SME ministry's 591 innovation products designated from 2020 through last year. 194 had a pilot purchase by the Public Procurement Service. 186 had no pilot purchase and no purchase by any public institution.

Ministry's 591 innovation products, designated 2020 through last year In products

186 of 591 products had no public buyer; 194 had a pilot (Ministry's 591 innovation products, designated 2020 through last year)
ItemValueClaim
Pilot purchase by procurement agency194 products5
No public purchase of any kind186 products1

What happened

  • Only 194 of the ministry's 591 products, 32.8%, had a Public Procurement Service pilot purchase, against 43.6% for all 2,774 innovation products designated through last year, per the budget office.
  • Of the 194 piloted products, 59, or 30.4%, drew no later purchase from other public institutions, though their pilot contracts totalled about 12 billion won.
  • Of the 405 products with any public purchase record, including pilots, 138, or 34.1%, were bought by only one institution.
  • The Ministry of SMEs and Startups provided the figures to People Power Party lawmaker Cho Ji-yeon, whose office released them on the 11th.

Why it matters

  • cost For pilot-only products the procurement agency is the whole public market, so its pilot budget is underwriting firms that no other public buyer has yet chosen.
  • constraint A certified firm with one public buyer has its public revenue tied to that agency's budget, a thin base on which to scale production for the public sector.
  • decision The ministry has to decide whether its demand-finding effort goes to the products that never sold or to the single-buyer products closest to winning a second customer.

A pilot purchase is the Public Procurement Service buying a product's first units itself. For 59 of the ministry's certified products, it is the only public sale on record [6]. Add the products that never sold at all and 245 of the 591 designations, or 41.5%, have no buyer among public institutions other than the procurement agency [16]. The ministry says the label exists to get products into early use through purchases by public institutions [3].

Those pilots were sizeable. They averaged roughly 203 million won a product [19], and 43 of the 59 contracts were worth more than 100 million won each [7].

Sedaily's report presents its single-buyer figure as a picture of public procurement as a whole [8]. Its base of 405 products is exactly 591 less 186, the ministry's own count of products with any purchase [15]. If that is the ministry's cohort, then 267 of the 591, or 45.2%, have sold to more than one public institution [14].

Had the ministry's products won pilots at the budget office's average rate, the 591 would hold about 258 pilot contracts, 64 more than they do [18]. The comparison is loose. The budget office counts all designations through last year, while the ministry's figures begin in 2020 [4][1].

There are innocent explanations for some of this. The report does not break the 591 down by designation year [1], so products certified last year may not yet have had time to find buyers. A product built for one agency's work will have one buyer by design. And the ministry draws candidates partly from R&D projects [3]. Research output can be further from what procurement offices buy than products that come in by other routes. We think the label is working for many of these firms mainly as a route to one state-paid order. The case for it as a source of public customers rests on two groups: the 211 products public institutions bought with no pilot at all [17], and the 135 piloted products that went on to other public buyers [20]. A year-by-year breakdown showing the 2020 and 2021 cohorts spread across several buyers each would prove that view wrong.

Both responses in the report call for more effort to find buyers. "The ministry is working to identify purchasing demand at public institutions and help firms secure early sales channels in order to expand purchases of innovation products," a ministry official said [11]. Its tools include demonstration purchases and first government purchases [10]. Cho said the program will deliver results only if certification leads to actual purchases and use in the field [13]. "Public institutions should actively identify purchasing demand and widen sales channels so that innovation products can be used at more public work sites," she said [12].

What to watch

  • A budget office single-buyer rate for all 2,774 innovation products would show whether the SME ministry's cohort is an outlier.
  • Any follow-on orders for the 59 pilot-only products through the ministry's demonstration and first government purchase programs.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence60
Adoption40
Hype gap+5
Incentives35
Confidence55
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    186 of the 591 innovation products the Ministry of SMEs and Startups designated between 2020 and last year, or 31.5%, recorded neither pilot purchases by the Public Procurement Service nor purchases by public institutions.

    ReportedSupportedSource: Ministry data analysed by en.sedaily.comView cited source
  2. [2]

    The figures come from data the Ministry of SMEs and Startups submitted to the office of Rep. Cho Ji-yeon of the People Power Party, released on the 11th.

    ReportedSupportedSource: en.sedaily.comView cited source
  3. [3]

    Innovation products are designated after evaluating the novelty of their technology and their public benefit; the ministry selects products developed through R&D projects, among others, and supports their early market entry through purchases by public institutions.

    ReportedSupportedSource: en.sedaily.comView cited source

Sources

1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. en.sedaily.com

    1 article · October 11, 2026

    Three in 10 State-Certified Innovation Products Draw No Public Buyers

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Topics

Entities

Loading related stories