Invest1 distinct publisher3 min readUpdated
US dealership service and parts sales hit $164.6 billion last year, up 48% in five years, while average profit per public store sits well below its 2022 peak.
The Investor · Invest desk
Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made
US dealership service and parts sales hit $164.6 billion last year, up 48% in five years, while average profit per public store sits well below its 2022 peak.
Dealership service and parts sales reached $164.6 billion last year, up 48% over five years, according to the National Automobile Dealers Association [3]. Over the same period the average profit at publicly traded dealership groups fell sharply from its 2022 peak [5][6], which means the question for anyone holding auto retail is no longer what a new car earns but what a returning customer earns.
The front-end story is simple. Kerrigan Advisers, cited by CNBC, put average pretax profit per public dealership at $6.8 million in 2022, more than triple the $1.9 million of 2018 [5]. For 2025, the same work puts average gross profits at public-company stores at about $3.9 million [6]. Those are not the same line item, so the move from 6.8 to 3.9 is directional rather than arithmetic [7]. The direction is not in dispute: supply has moved closer to demand and competition among sellers has increased [19], and Cox Automotive counted about 2.73 million new vehicles on dealer lots at the start of August, essentially flat year over year, describing the market as possibly moving toward a healthier balance between inventory and demand [8].
Prices, meanwhile, have not broken. Kelley Blue Book put the average new-vehicle listing at $49,249 at the end of July and the average transaction at $49,855, up 1.9% from a year earlier [9], which is roughly $606 of transaction above listing [10]. High prices with thinner gross is the signature of a seller that has lost pricing power without getting volume relief in exchange.
Which brings the analysis to the bay, where dealers are not defending a position so much as trying to recover one. Ducker Carlisle found 42% of Americans named a chain such as Jiffy Lube, Meineke or Walmart as their primary service provider in 2025, up from 20% in 2020 [2]: a 22 point swing, more than a doubling, in five years [18]. Those chains compete on oil changes, filter checks, tire rotations and light repairs with flexible scheduling, and have passed dealerships as the default choice for American vehicle service [17].
The offsetting tailwind is the fleet itself. The average passenger car on US roads was 14.5 years old last year against 11.5 years a decade earlier, per the Bureau of Transportation Statistics [11], which is three additional years, about 26% more usable life, over which each vehicle generates work [12].
Tim Pohanka, executive vice president and chief operating officer of Pohanka Nissan Hyundai in Fredericksburg, Virginia, told Fortune that compressed new-car margins have made service "the biggest opportunity" [13]. His stores take walk-in appointments, offer financing on service work, and send a video of the full vehicle with every job [14]. He also argues that service customers are more likely to buy their next car from him [15], and treats recurring service revenue as ballast against disruptions from tariffs to supply chain problems [16]. The financing detail deserves attention on its own terms: when repair work is sold on payment plans, the binding constraint is the customer's cash, not their willingness to book.
What to watch is whether the share number stops moving. Dollar growth in dealer service can coexist with continued share loss when the car fleet is aging and repair prices are rising, so the next Ducker Carlisle read matters more than the next NADA total [2][3][11]. Second, watch whether the 48% five-year growth rate in service and parts holds as its base gets larger, since it implies roughly $111 billion five years ago [3][4]. Third, watch whether transaction prices keep printing above listing prices, because that gap closing is what turns normalized margins into compressed ones [9][10].
Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
In 2025, average gross profits for dealerships owned by public companies came in at about $3.9 million.
As gross profits from selling cars fall from pandemic-era highs, dealerships are trying to convince customers to return for every oil change to protect their bottom line.
Ducker Carlisle reported that 42% of Americans identified a chain such as Jiffy Lube, Meineke or Walmart as their "primary service provider" in 2025, up from 20% in 2020.
Dealerships' total service and parts sales grew 48% over the past five years and stood at $164.6 billion as of last year, according to the National Automobile Dealers Association.
Average pretax profit per public dealership more than tripled to $6.8 million in 2022 from $1.9 million in 2018, according to a Kerrigan Advisers study of publicly traded dealership groups cited by CNBC.
The 2022 figure is average pretax profit and the 2025 figure is average gross profit, so the two are different measures and the decline between them is directional rather than a like-for-like calculation.
Evidence-backed comparisons of source perspectives and observed adoption signals. Read the methodology
Which Builder, Operator, and Investor concerns the observed source mix emphasized—not a truth score.
Evidence, demonstrated adoption, hype gap, incentives, and confidence are assessed independently, each on its own current evidence. How these are measured.
Solid third-party data, single publisher, one metric mismatch
The market-level claims are attributed to named, checkable institutions — NADA for service and parts revenue, Ducker Carlisle for consumer service share, Cox Automotive for inventory, Kelley Blue Book for prices, the Bureau of Transportation Statistics for vehicle age. Against that, the whole cluster rests on one article, the pivotal profit comparison mixes average pretax profit with average gross profit (and the 2022 leg arrives secondhand via CNBC), and every operational and retention assertion comes from a single interested executive.
Consumer and revenue shift measured; dealer-side execution thin
Adoption is genuinely observed on two axes: dealer fixed-operations revenue at $164.6 billion after 48% five-year growth, and consumer migration to chains from 20% to 42% as primary service provider. What is not broadly evidenced is dealer-side adoption of the service-first playbook — the operational detail comes from exactly one named dealer group, so strategy diffusion across the franchise base is unmeasured.
Direction real, magnitude overstated by mismatched profit metrics
The underlying shift is well documented, so this is not manufactured, but the framing runs ahead of the arithmetic: a $6.8 million pretax figure set against a $3.9 million gross figure implies a collapse the data does not establish, and 'the oil change is the trade' is asserted without any dealer service margin, absorption rate or per-store fixed-ops profit to show service actually replaces lost vehicle gross. The counter-signal that consumers are defaulting to chains is reported but not treated as a limit on the thesis.
Interested sources throughout the evidence chain
Nearly every quantitative and qualitative input comes from a party with a stake in the framing: a dealer-group COO promoting service value, NADA as the dealers' trade association supplying the service and parts figure, Cox Automotive and Kelley Blue Book as auto-marketplace businesses supplying inventory and price data, and Kerrigan Advisers as a dealership buy-sell advisory supplying the profit series. The article discloses these affiliations plainly, which limits but does not remove the distortion risk.
Moderate: consistent data, no corroboration, mixed metrics
Confidence is capped by structure rather than content. The market data is internally consistent and institutionally sourced, and the structural drivers (fleet age, price levels, normalized inventory) all point the same way, but there is a single publisher, no primary reports linked, one non-comparable profit comparison at the core of the argument, and one interested voice carrying all the operational testimony.
invest
The 30-Year Sets a Record and Everything Long-Dated Gets Repriced1 distinct publisher
invest
Home Depot's $730M tariff refund moved gross margin 25 basis points. That is the whole story.1 distinct publisher
invest
American's 2028 seatback screens are a margin bet, not a passenger gift1 distinct publisher
invest
Tariff refunds are landing, and where the cash stops tells you who has pricing power1 distinct publisher
Distinct publishers with included, body-backed reporting in this cluster.