Skip to content

Invest1 publisher2 min readPublished

Diesel's 74% climb implies roughly 15% higher operating costs for truckers

US diesel's record $6.59 a gallon, up 74% in a year per the EIA, implies trucking operating costs about 15% higher on an industry rule of thumb. Truckers run on margins too thin to absorb that, so the increase moves into the price of whatever they haul.

The Investor · Invest desk

Illustration accompanying Diesel's 74% climb implies roughly 15% higher operating costs for truckers

What happened

  • The near-complete closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sharply cut the flow of the crude oil that refiners turn into diesel, gasoline, jet fuel and heating oil.
  • Ukrainian attacks on Russian refineries, which intensified through 2026, have restricted how much Russian diesel reaches the global market.
  • After more than six months of US-Iran war, most companies and countries have used up whatever extra fuel supplies they held, according to the analysis Fortune published.
  • A trucking industry research firm estimates that a 20% increase in fuel costs translates into about a 4% increase in operating costs.

Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • cost Air travellers pay part of the diesel bill too, because jet fuel comes from the same refining process and fares have risen alongside it.
  • exposure Households heating with oil go into winter facing higher bills, since heating oil is made the same way as diesel and shares its shortage.
  • constraint Transit agencies pay more to run diesel buses and trains at the same moment expensive gasoline pushes more riders onto them.

Divide the research firm's 4% by its 20% and the estimate says fuel is about a fifth of a truck's operating costs [1]. Apply that fifth to a 74% rise in the pump price [1] and operating costs come out about 14.8% higher [2]. That result assumes fuel was still a fifth of the bill a year ago and that nothing else on the cost sheet moved. The source's own dollar figures put the year-ago price near $3.81, and a $2.78 rise on that base is closer to 73% than 74%; at 73% the estimate is 14.6% [3].

Location moves the answer more than rounding does. The 15% is a national-average figure, and a fleet's own number depends on where it fills up. California's average has topped $8 a gallon while the Gulf Coast pays $6.03 [9], a gap of at least $1.97 a gallon, or about a third [4]. The analysis Fortune published puts part of that gap down to the many refineries and terminals along the Gulf [10].

The buffer that analysis describes as spent is physical inventory [2]. The piece does not address fuel hedges or forward purchase contracts, so it cannot show how much of the $6.59, if any, fleets still have covered at older prices. It describes a market with little stock left, where buyers compete for what is available and for what little is produced each day [14]. Diesel has risen faster than gasoline and stayed higher for longer [13].

Demand could give way before supply returns. The analysis says farmers facing high fuel costs may restrict or postpone planting and harvesting [7]. A postponed harvest leaves diesel for other buyers and less food for markets. I think the price stays tied to crude flows through the Strait of Hormuz [3] and to Russian refinery output [4], because the inventory that would have let prices lag the disruption has been drawn down [2]. A falling EIA weekly average while the Strait stays mostly shut would prove that wrong, since it would mean demand cuts are rationing the fuel.

What to watch

  • The EIA's next weekly diesel readings, and whether the national average falls while the Strait of Hormuz stays mostly closed.
  • Any reopening of the Strait of Hormuz or a letup in Ukrainian strikes on Russian refineries.
  • Heating oil prices as winter approaches, since the fuel comes off the same refining process as diesel.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories