Skip to content

SecurityNot yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher2 min readPublished Updated

Shared certificates and parent domains merge three SilkParasite RAT families into one cluster

Hunt.io mapped five SpiceRAT command-and-control servers active in mid-March 2026 and found a certificate spoofing Uzbekistan's state railway, issued by a Chinese state-funded CA, on hosts Bitdefender had filed under two other malware families.

The Watch · Security desk

How we use AISend a correction

Photograph accompanying Shared certificates and parent domains merge three SilkParasite RAT families into one cluster
Photo: securityaffairs.com

What happened

  • Hunt.io and researcher Guy Yasur found five SpiceRAT command-and-control servers active together in mid-March 2026 at different hosting providers in different countries, sharing hostnames, certificates and one cloned default web page.
  • Shared parent domains and an identical TLS certificate connect those hosts to servers Bitdefender attributed to SpiceRAT, NodeEdgeRAT and NomadRAT, three of the seven families in its SilkParasite report.
  • One certificate in the cluster impersonates Uzbekistan's state railway authority, presented as a domain-validated certificate on azure.uzrailwaystax[.]com.
  • A HuntSQL search on the SHA-256 hash of a cloned RTX Corporation homepage served by one of the five servers returned exactly 13 hosts carrying the identical page.
  • Domains in the cluster spoof named state bodies including Turkmenistan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Turkmengaz, the Galkynysh gas field and Tojiktelecom in Tajikistan.

Why it matters

  • capability Hunt teams get pivots that outlive any build of the malware: a certificate, a domain registration record and a static page hash keep resolving after the RAT is recompiled and the samples change.
  • constraint Blocking at the issuer is not usable here, because the CA's certificate population is far larger than the campaign, so detection has to key on the individual spoofing certificate.
  • contradiction Bitdefender's seven separate families and Hunt.io's shared infrastructure cannot both drive the same tracking logic; the network view merges what sample analysis kept apart, and Hunt.io still declines to name one operator.
  • decision Anyone running the SilkParasite indicator list as a blocklist now chooses between adopting the page hash and parent-domain pivots or working from a view that covers a minority of the known cluster.

The page that links the cluster is benign. Requests to ns2.asiainfo.it[.]com on 188.190.29[.]126 returned a full copy of RTX Corporation's homepage, navigation, subsidiary links and stock ticker included, and it contained no malicious code [10]. It was not unique to that server [10]. Hunt.io describes the clone as byte-for-byte identical wherever it lands, and its reuse across the cluster made it a fingerprint [12].

Of the 13 hosts the hash returned, three were already on Bitdefender's SpiceRAT list and two more matched Hunt.io's own SpiceRAT signature [11]. The remaining eight came in through shared nginx versions and the same static page [11]. Five were known, so one page hash returned 2.6 times as many hosts as sample-based attribution had [17].

Hunt.io gives two readings of the RTX clone: the page rendered cleanly and was grabbed as a convenient template, or it is a default deployment asset inside shared tooling [12].

Hunt.io traced the spoofing certificate to its issuer. "The certificate imitating the Uzbekistan railway entity was issued by TLC, a certificate authority wholly funded by CAICT, a Chinese state research institute under the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology," the report said [5]. Nearly 3,000 servers host TLC certificates, so the issuer narrows nothing by itself; Hunt.io's reading is that a domain-validated certificate spoofing a Central Asian state entity, bought from a China-based CA, points to a deliberate procurement channel [9].

The links between families are uneven in strength. help.hoster-kg[.]com, on 193.29.58[.]192, presented the same railway-spoofing certificate, and Bitdefender had attributed evo.hoster-kg[.]com to NodeEdgeRAT; the two are joined by shared registration of hoster-kg[.]com, not by a shared server [13]. kg.tdtu[.]org shares a parent domain with mineconom.tdtu[.]org, listed in the SilkParasite report as a NomadRAT C2 indicator [14]. Bitdefender treated the families as distinct [4]. Hunt.io stops short of naming one operator and says the pattern shows a support function or toolset shared across the campaign [15].

Bitdefender published the SilkParasite report in August 2026 [1]. The five servers Hunt.io logged together were active in mid-March, roughly five months earlier [7][18].

What to watch

  • Whether Bitdefender revises the seven-family split now that three of them share certificates and parent domains.
  • Whether TLC revokes the railway-spoofing certificate, and which CA the cluster buys from next.
  • Whether the RTX homepage clone disappears from cluster hosts now that the page hash is published.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence55
Adoption
Insufficient
Hype gap+15
Incentives40
Confidence55
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    Hunt.io and researcher Guy Yasur traced a cluster of SpiceRAT command-and-control servers that predate and extend Bitdefender's August 2026 SilkParasite report.

    ReportedSupportedSource: securityaffairs.com, summarising Hunt.io2 sources— create a free account to open themView cited source
  2. [2]

    The work does not dissect malware samples; it maps the network side of the operation, tying three of SilkParasite's seven RAT families (SpiceRAT, NodeEdgeRAT and NomadRAT) through shared certificates, domains and hosting patterns.

  3. [3]

    Hunt.io report: "Shared parent domains and an identical TLS certificate connect this infrastructure to hosts Bitdefender attributed to SpiceRAT, NodeEdgeRAT, and NomadRAT, three of the seven malware families documented in the SilkParasite report."

    ReportedSupportedSource: Hunt.io report, quoted by securityaffairs.com2 sources— create a free account to open themView cited source

Sources

1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. securityaffairs.com

    1 article · September 17, 2026

    SilkParasite Infrastructure Links SpiceRAT to Central Asian Targets

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Topics

  • China-nexus espionage in Central AsiaFollow
  • TLS certificate abuseFollow
  • Threat infrastructure analysisFollow
Loading related stories