Invest1 publisher3 min readPublished Updated
SK's divorce bill stopped being about 944 billion won and became a share overhang
Chey Tae-won's second appeal was not triggered by the size of the award but by the medium of payment. Cash or SK stock is now a governance question for SK holders.
The Investor · Invest desk
Drafted by a language model from the sources cited here and checked against its claim ledger before publication. How we use AISend a correction

What happened
- The asset-division award in the case is 944 billion won ($687 million), the subject of a nine-year legal battle.
- SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won, 65, filed a second appeal to the Supreme Court against the remanded appellate ruling ordering him to pay 944 billion won in asset division.
- The recipient of the ordered payment is Roh Soh-yeong, 65, director of the Art Center Nabi.
- According to the legal community, the second appeal stemmed from a tug-of-war over payment method: Chey's side proposed paying through a mix of cash and SK shares, and negotiations broke down when Roh's side demanded the full amount in cash as stated in the ruling.
- Sources say Chey's side had initially considered accepting the remanded appellate ruling handed down on the 24th of last month and closing out the litigation.
Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
The dispute between SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won and Roh Soh-yeong is no longer about the size of the award; both sides have had the number since last month. What broke the settlement was the medium of payment, which turns a family matter into a share-register question for anyone holding SK.
Chey, 65, has filed a second appeal to the Supreme Court against the remanded appellate ruling ordering him to pay 944 billion won ($687 million) in asset division to Roh, 65, director of the Art Center Nabi, closing a nine-year case that is not closed [1][2][3]. According to the legal community as reported by Seoul Economic Daily, the appeal came out of a tug-of-war over method: Chey's side proposed a mix of cash and SK shares, and Roh's side demanded the full amount in cash, as the ruling states [4]. Sources cited in the same report say Chey's side had initially considered accepting the ruling handed down on the 24th of last month and ending the litigation [5]. The obstacle was raising 944 billion won in cash in roughly three weeks, before the second appeal deadline on the 14th [6].
That is the governance point, stated plainly. Offloading a large volume of SK shares fast was seen as risking a drop in the share price and instability in the group's control structure [7]. So Chey offered to pay in stock, cover any shortfall if the price fell, and claim nothing back if it rose, which is a put written in Roh's favour [8]. Roh's side held to cash [4].
The arithmetic has moved against the stock option. The remanded appellate court used April 16, 2024, the close of appellate arguments, as the valuation reference date [13], then set the split at 33.3% to Roh and 66.6% to Chey after factoring in a more than fivefold rise from 160,000 won to 858,000 won, on a finding that Roh had contributed in part to the group's corporate value [14][15][16]. Shares have since fallen more than 30%, to around 500,000 won [18]. At 858,000 won, 944 billion won is about 1.1 million shares; at 500,000 won it is about 1.89 million, roughly 72% more paper to place [19].
Delay is priced. Once the ruling is finalised, 5% annual late-payment interest begins the next day at about 130 million won a day [9], on the order of 47 billion won a year [20]. Contesting the full sum runs to tens of billions of won in filing fees alone, per the legal community [11]. Chey's team disclosed the appeal at 11:59 p.m. on the 14th, one minute inside the deadline [10].
Watch whether the Supreme Court takes the substantive question rather than the timing. Chey is expected to argue that reflecting post-reference-date price movements in the division ratio is logically contradictory, and to point at the recent 30%-plus decline [17][18]; the stated key issues are the division-ratio principles and the valuation reference date [12]. A remand reopens the number. A dismissal restarts the interest meter at 130 million won a day and leaves Chey funding cash [9]. For SK minorities the exposure is the same either way: whether close to 1.9 million shares eventually have to find a buyer, and on whose schedule [19].