Skip to content

SecurityNot yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher2 min readPublished

Qilin and Settra ransomware crews are using a PAN-OS VPN bypass disclosed in May

ReliaQuest says Qilin and Settra ransomware groups are exploiting CVE-2026-0257, a PAN-OS GlobalProtect auth bypass disclosed May 13. Upgrading closes the entry point, but sessions opened before the upgrade may survive it.

The Watch · Security desk

How we use AISend a correction

Illustration accompanying Qilin and Settra ransomware crews are using a PAN-OS VPN bypass disclosed in May
Generated illustration
A May VPN flaw went from probes to ransomware by October When Palo Alto disclosed the PAN-OS GlobalProtect auth bypass, and when security teams reported exploitation attempts and then ransomware use.

Timeline: May 13, 2026, Palo Alto discloses the GlobalProtect auth bypass. June: Unit 42 reports exploit attempts, after Rapid7 in late May. July: Arctic Wolf reports attempts. October 9: ReliaQuest says Qilin and Settra use it for VPN initial access.

A May VPN flaw went from probes to ransomware by October
DateEventClaim
May 13, 2026Palo Alto Networks discloses the GlobalProtect auth bypass4
June 2026Unit 42 reports attempted exploitation, after Rapid7 in late May6
July 2026Arctic Wolf reports attempted exploitation6
October 9, 2026ReliaQuest: Qilin and Settra use it for VPN initial access1

What happened

  • ReliaQuest observed the Qilin and Settra activity alongside Cobalt Strike, BloodHound and SharpHound, the offensive tools used after a VPN foothold is established.
  • Other teams logged attempts earlier: Rapid7 in late May, Palo Alto's Unit 42 in June and Arctic Wolf in July.
  • Palo Alto scored the flaw 7.8 on CVSS with a "highest" urgency rating and shipped fixed versions with the disclosure.
  • The affected list covers PAN-OS 10.2.0, 11.1.0, 11.2.0 and 12.1.0, all Cloud NGFW instances, and Prisma Access 10.2.0 and 11.2.0.
  • ReliaQuest rated it "highly likely" that the groups keep trying the flaw over the next three months.

Why it matters

  • exposure An unpatched gateway on the affected list is a working initial-access route for ransomware crews, and the intrusion starts as a VPN login.
  • cost Cleanup costs more than an upgrade: terminating every GlobalProtect session drops all remote users, and someone has to review connections for hostnames such as "kali".
  • decision Exploitation reports date to late May, so in our view a review of VPN sessions should reach back that far, not start at the day the upgrade was applied.
  • precedent A flaw that drew only "limited" attempts in May reached ransomware operators within 149 days of disclosure, and the forecast runs three more months.

The bypass ends in a VPN session that looks routine [1]. ReliaQuest said, "Because this access originates through an organization's own VPN, malicious activity can resemble legitimate remote work and may go undetected until credential theft, lateral movement, data theft or ransomware deployment is underway." [9]

The firm's guidance puts session cleanup after the upgrade. Operators should switch off authentication override cookies wherever they aren't needed, end every active GlobalProtect session once the patch is in, and look into connections they did not expect, such as sessions from hostnames like "kali" [10]. ReliaQuest said, "Patching alone may not remove access established before remediation." [11]

The timeline is long. ReliaQuest's advisory came 149 days after Palo Alto's May 13 disclosure [14]. In its own notice, Palo Alto described only "limited exploit attempts on unpatched PAN-OS devices without mitigations applied" [13]. Infosecurity Magazine reports that some systems appear to remain unpatched [12].

In our view that sequence is a flaw in steady use for five months that has now reached ransomware operators. The sources do not say whether the same actors sit behind the earlier Rapid7, Unit 42 and Arctic Wolf reports.

Score is a weak guide here. Infosecurity Magazine describes a 7.8 as high-severity [5], and a queue sorted by score alone would rank it behind any critical-rated flaw. For a gateway on the affected list, the exploitation reports outrank the score.

The ransomware link rests on ReliaQuest alone. The article does not say how many organizations were breached, and the earlier vendor reports are described only as attempted exploitation [6].

What to watch

  • Whether Rapid7, Unit 42 or Arctic Wolf confirm ransomware use of CVE-2026-0257 independently of ReliaQuest.
  • Named victims of Qilin or Settra intrusions that trace back to a GlobalProtect session.
  • Any indicators from ReliaQuest or Palo Alto beyond the "kali" hostname for hunting sessions opened before the upgrade.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence50
Adoption
Insufficient
Hype gap−10
Incentives
Insufficient
Confidence55
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    ReliaQuest said in advisories posted on social media on October 9 that multiple groups, including the Qilin and Settra ransomware operations, are actively targeting CVE-2026-0257 to establish unauthorized VPN sessions and gain initial access to internal networks.

    ReportedSupportedSource: ReliaQuest, via Infosecurity MagazineView cited source
  2. [2]

    CVE-2026-0257 is an authentication bypass vulnerability in PAN-OS GlobalProtect and Prisma Access.

    ReportedSupportedView cited source
  3. [3]

    Affected products include PAN-OS versions 10.2.0, 11.1.0, 11.2.0 and 12.1.0, all instances of Cloud NGFW, and two versions of Prisma Access (10.2.0 and 11.2.0).

    ReportedSupportedView cited source

Sources

1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. infosecurity-magazine.com

    1 article · October 12, 2026

    Months-Old Palo Alto VPN Vulnerability Remains a Target for Ransomware Groups

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Loading related stories