Invest1 publisher3 min readPublished
Qatar's energy minister answers Bessent's 'worthless water' claim with a $150 barrel
Saad al-Kaabi says Scott Bessent is wrong that pipeline expansions will strand the Strait of Hormuz, and he warns that a disruption there takes oil to $150. The lines in question move crude, and Qatar ships gas.
The Investor · Invest desk

What happened
- Scott Bessent told Fox Business on September 1 that the Strait of Hormuz, the waterway between Iran and the Arabian Peninsula, would become "a worthless piece of water" within two years.
- His premise is that pipeline capacity expansions by Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Iraq will reroute enough oil volume by 2027 to strip the Strait of its status as a strategic chokepoint.
- Qatar's energy minister Saad al-Kaabi says that assessment is wrong, and warns that any geopolitical disruption to operations in the area could send oil to $150 per barrel.
- The IEA counted roughly 34% of the world's crude oil passing through the Strait in 2025, the largest share of any chokepoint in global energy markets.
Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
- constraint Bypass pipelines relieve crude only. LNG needs a liquefaction plant at one end and a regasification terminal at the other. Netting off Hormuz risk against new pipeline capacity leaves the gas leg of the exposure untouched.
- exposure Qatar's North Field expansion is adding LNG output that can only reach buyers by sea through the same Strait. The incremental revenue from the build sits behind one waterway.
- cost Treating the chokepoint as obsolete by 2027 assumes Gulf operators commit tens of billions of dollars of pipeline capital and finish building on a schedule that has to start now.
- contradiction The US Treasury secretary's framing devalues Iran's shipping deterrent while Doha's warning argues for a standing obligation to keep the water open. The same strait is being called obsolete and irreplaceable in the same season.
Bessent and al-Kaabi are talking about different cargoes. The lines in Bessent's case carry crude. Saudi Arabia's East-West Pipeline runs from the Gulf coast to Yanbu on the Red Sea, in various forms since the 1980s [8]. The UAE's Habshan-Fujairah link runs to Fujairah on the Gulf of Oman, completed in 2012 [9]. Qatar sells liquefied gas. It needs a liquefaction train at the loading end and a regasification terminal at the discharge end, and cryptobriefing.com reports that every pipeline network under discussion leaves that sea leg in place [12]. Every Qatari cargo transits the Strait [7].
Between them those two lines still move a fraction of what goes through the Strait each day [10]. Fifteen years separate the completion of the Emirati line from the year Bessent names [16]. Lifting the bypass share from a fraction to a majority would cost tens of billions of dollars and take years of construction [10]. Iraq's proposed expansions run along routes that have been sabotaged before [11]. The source gives the deadline twice, in two forms: "within two years" from the September 1 remark, and rerouting "by 2027" as the premise underneath it [17].
Each man's position pays him. Al-Kaabi said in May 2026 that "everybody is obligated to open the Strait of Hormuz for the economies of the world" [6]. Qatar has no overland route, so a standing multilateral commitment to keep the water open is worth more in Doha than anywhere else [7]. Bessent's line runs the other way. A worthless piece of water is also a worthless threat, and Washington has been tightening sanctions on Iranian oil exports while Tehran signals it can reach Gulf shipping [1][14]. The report carries no barrels-per-day figure for the volume Bessent expects to move overland [19]. It attributes doubt about his timeline to unnamed energy infrastructure analysts [15].
The narrow version of Bessent's case is stronger than the televised one. A chokepoint sets the price by carrying the marginal barrel, not by carrying all the flow. If the Saudi, Emirati and Iraqi lines take a slice off the top, the expected loss from a closure falls. Al-Kaabi's $150 then becomes a crude number with nothing to say about gas [4]. He could also be right on crude and late, in which case the 34% the IEA counted for 2025 barely moves by 2027 [5][2].
In my view the bypass credit applies to crude and stops there, and Qatar's North Field expansion is adding output whose only route to Asian and European buyers is the same water [13][7]. Dated, financed commissioning schedules from Gulf operators, showing a majority of Strait crude moving overland before the end of 2027, would settle it the other way [2][10]. Short of that, the only measured figure in the exchange is the IEA's 34% for 2025 [5].
What to watch
- Dated and financed commissioning schedules from Saudi, Emirati or Iraqi operators putting a barrels-per-day number on new bypass throughput before the end of 2027.
- Whether Bessent restates the two-year claim with a volume figure attached, or lets the 2027 date stand on its own.
- Whether al-Kaabi repeats the $150 warning as North Field output comes onstream.