Invest1 distinct publisher3 min readPublished
GAO says the IRS cleared about 98 percent of 177 million returns while the agency told those same auditors that staffing losses slowed the rest. Two Ohio CPAs are five months into that remainder, $8,000 outstanding.
The Investor · Invest desk

Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made
Two percent of 177 million comes to a little over 3.5 million returns [17], and that residual carries the whole argument, because the 98 percent GAO reported matched last year's rate [9] and a matched aggregate tells a preparer nothing about which client is sitting in the smaller pile.
Work the correspondence arithmetic instead. Three letters at 60 days each is 180 days of stated processing time against a filing-day estimate of three weeks, which is about eight and a half times the promise [18], and none of the three narrowed the question to a line item [4]. Monnie Johnston, who prepared returns professionally for three decades before retiring this year [1], said in the interview with cleveland.com that "something's clearly wrong" [6]. For a firm, the absence of a maturity date is the real problem: an $8,000 receivable due on an unknown day [3] can't be aged or borrowed against, and it can't be promised to a client who is deciding whether to make an estimated payment out of it.
The capacity behind that vagueness has a number. The agency shed about 27 percent of its workforce in a year after firings and buyouts, on statistics compiled by the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities [7], and by summer had left more than half of the 1,900 positions authorized for processing returns and correcting errors unfilled, which is fewer than 950 people hired against the authority [23][8]. The chance of reaching anyone by phone fell 16 percent relative to the prior season, from 25 percent of calls answered to 21 [19], and the reward for getting through is a hold that runs 75 percent longer, 14 minutes against eight [20]. Fully staffed walk-in centers are down 59 percent [21]. The IRS also told GAO that recent staff losses delayed programming updates its processing systems needed [10], which is deferred maintenance charged to next season's capacity rather than this one's.
The counter-thesis is in the same report, and it is not weak: the National Taxpayer Advocate called the season largely successful, with nearly 139 million individual returns processed and more than 90 million refunds issued [13], meaning roughly 65 percent of individual filers got their money [22]. One household of two CPAs is one observation, however well-qualified the observers. This is probably the wrong read of two data points, but the more interesting version of the claim is narrower than "the IRS is broken": throughput held while resolution lagged behind it, and the cost of that gap landed on the filers whose returns tripped a filter, whom the same Advocate describes as waiting weeks or months for money they needed for rent or medical bills, with identity-theft cases stretching close to two years [15][14]. GAO's report, released last month, says such problems have become more widespread because of the staff cuts [16].
What would prove this wrong is specific and checkable. If the unfilled share of those 1,900 processing positions closes before the next season opens [8], if the answered-call rate climbs back through 25 percent [11], and if a fourth letter arrives naming an actual discrepancy [4], then the five months was a hiring lag and not a new planning assumption. Until then, price the wait into the engagement.
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
Monnie Johnston is a certified public accountant who prepared tax returns professionally for three decades before retiring this year; her husband Bob is also a CPA.
The Johnstons filed their 2025 federal return electronically on March 22, and TurboTax confirmed the same day that the IRS had accepted it and told them to expect a refund 'typically in 3 weeks or less.'
Five months after filing, the Johnstons are still waiting on their $8,000 refund.
The couple has received three letters from the IRS; none explains what is actually wrong, and each says the agency needs another 60 days.
Bob Johnston worked through the IRS automated phone system until it said he would be transferred to a live representative, at which point a recording said the agency was over capacity and could not address the matter, and the call ended.
Monnie Johnston said in an interview: 'Something's clearly wrong.'
Distinct publishers with included, body-backed reporting in this cluster.
1 article · August 31, 2026
Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.
invest
The IRS graded itself on the one thing DOGE tried not to cut1 distinct publisher
invest
Treasury's 10-Basis-Point Rule Turns Trump Accounts Into a Compliance Problem1 distinct publisher
invest
Losing lottery tickets at $575 per $90,000: the loss deduction now has a spot market1 distinct publisher
invest
Treasury Moves to Bar Undocumented Filers From Refundable Credits, and Preparers Inherit the Screening1 distinct publisher
Evidence-backed comparisons of source perspectives and observed adoption signals. Read the methodology
Which Builder, Operator, and Investor concerns the observed source mix emphasized—not a truth score.
Evidence, demonstrated adoption, hype gap, incentives, and confidence are assessed independently, each on its own current evidence. How these are measured.
Federal auditors, one reporter's summary
The national spine is unusually sturdy for a local-desk story — GAO, the Treasury Inspector General, the National Taxpayer Advocate's June testimony — but every one of those documents reaches readers as paraphrase in a single account, and the workforce headline comes from an advocacy group's compilation rather than a payroll disclosure. The household half rests entirely on two people's recollection plus a TurboTax confirmation screen, with the IRS declining to discuss the case.
Millions in the remainder, one name attached
Scale is documented at the aggregate: roughly 3.5 million returns sit in the unprocessed 2 percent, four in five callers never reach anyone, and the Advocate puts frozen refunds and near-two-year identity theft waits in the millions of affected taxpayers. What is thin is the middle distance. One household is named, one senator's office is looking into it, and another Ohio senator's office reports no uptick in complaints at all.
The two percent does the arguing
Nothing in this reporting establishes that staff cuts caused the Johnstons' delay — the letters name no defect, and a squeaky-clean return caught in a filter is a mundane outcome in any year. The story's own sources supply the deflation: throughput identical to last year, and the watchdog itself calling the season largely successful. The overreach is modest and mostly structural, one Brunswick household carrying a national causal argument the documents quoted here do not quite make.
Everyone quoted is arguing a budget
This is a staffing fight in which each voice has a side. The agency's spokesman answers a refund question with a line about the President's Working Families Tax Cuts. More than a dozen Democratic senators are on record pressing the IRS chief executive over his claim of no additional staffing needs. The workforce number comes from a group whose research exists to argue for public capacity. The publisher's own readers are accountants who eat these delays on behalf of clients — a sympathetic audience for exactly this framing.
Direction solid, causation unproven
Take the service-channel numbers to the bank: answer rates, wait times and center counts are specific, sourced to a named watchdog, and consistent with the hiring shortfalls. Treat the through-line with more care. Whether cuts explain this $8,000, and whether such cases are actually multiplying rather than merely being noticed, is not settled by anything in front of us — and with a single account in our coverage there is no second reporter to check the claim against the report it came from.