Invest1 publisher3 min readPublished
Pernod Ricard Korea accounts for three-quarters of the revenue Korea's whiskey importers lost
Pernod Ricard Korea's revenue fell 31.1% to 120.7 billion won, about three-quarters of the combined decline at four major Korean whiskey importers. Rivals protected profit by buying less stock, so the 22% fall in import tonnage may overstate the drop in drinking.
The Investor · Invest desk
What happened
- Korea Customs Service data show 12,205 tons of whiskey arrived from January through August, against 17,526 tons in the same months of 2024.
- Annual imports ran near 15,000 tons in 2020 and 2021, then climbed past 30,000 tons in 2023, the peak before the current slide.
- Diageo Korea's operating profit rose 14.4% to 10.7 billion won in the year to June even as its revenue slipped 4.3% to 153.65 billion won.
Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
- contradiction If importers are selling down boom-era stock, the customs series makes the Korean slump look deeper than retail demand is, and brand owners sizing the market from import data alone would cut too far.
- decision Importers have kept most of their brand budgets and cut overhead and purchasing instead, so another year of falling revenue would leave advertising as the next cost in line.
- exposure Pernod Ricard Korea's profit is falling about 2.3 times as fast as its revenue, leaving it the importer most exposed if imports keep sliding toward 2020-21 levels.
The four importers booked about 409.7 billion won of revenue in their latest fiscal years, against roughly 481.2 billion won a year earlier. That is a fall of about 71.5 billion won, or 15% [1][2]. Pernod Ricard Korea, the importer of Ballantine's and Chivas Regal, went from about 175.2 billion won to 120.7 billion, roughly 54.5 billion of the gap [18][3]. The periods do not line up (Diageo Korea's year ends in June, Brown-Forman Korea's in April, and William Grant & Sons Korea reported calendar 2025), so the total is a rough cross-section [2][4][6]. Take Pernod out and the other three lost about 5.6% of revenue between them [4].
Customs tonnage fell much harder, down about 30% in two years on a January-to-August basis [9]. Three readings fit a 22% drop in tons beside single-digit revenue declines at three of the four importers [1][4]. One is mix: fewer, dearer bottles, consistent with an industry official's comment that consumption is now concentrated among enthusiasts and a narrower set of products [15]. Another is destocking. Diageo Korea's merchandise purchases fell three times as fast as its revenue [8], and an importer selling down stock bought during the boom can keep supplying shops while importing less. The third is the analysts' account, a normalisation of pandemic demand compounded by high inflation and weak consumer spending [14]. On that account, tonnage keeps falling.
Straight-lined over twelve months (a method that ignores seasonality), this year's 12,205 tons comes to about 18,300 tons [5]. The pace is still about a fifth above the roughly 15,000 tons a year Korea imported in 2020 and 2021 [13][5]. A return to that level would take another 3,300 tons or so off annual imports [5].
The margin defence leaned on overhead and purchasing more than on advertising. Diageo Korea cut advertising and promotion by 2.8 billion won, or 5.4% [9], under half of its 6.2 billion won saving on selling and administrative costs [8][6]. Those figures imply it still spends about 49 billion won a year on advertising and promotion, close to a third of revenue [6]. At Brown-Forman Korea, the 1.5 billion won advertising cut was under a quarter of a 6.3 billion won reduction in selling and administrative costs [7]. That reduction was larger than the roughly 4.7 billion won of revenue the company lost [10]. A Diageo Korea official said the company concentrated on resource allocation aimed at strengthening brand competitiveness and sustainable growth [16].
Pernod Ricard Korea's costs did not fall with its sales. Its operating profit dropped 71.6%, about 2.3 times the rate of its revenue decline, and William Grant & Sons Korea's fell 23.2% on a 5.3% revenue slip [5][6][11]. The reported figures for both companies do not include operating profit in won.
I think the evidence supports a real volume correction and a revenue problem concentrated at one importer. It supports less well the idea of a whole market shrinking by a fifth a year. The destocking reading fails if Diageo Korea's next report shows purchases falling no faster than revenue while customs tonnage keeps dropping, because the import figures would then be tracking what Koreans actually drink [8][1].
What to watch
- Korea Customs Service tonnage for September to December 2026: a full year well under the roughly 18,300-ton run rate would support the analysts' normalisation case.
- Pernod Ricard Korea's next audit report, for signs it has cut costs the way Diageo Korea and Brown-Forman Korea did after its 71.6% operating profit fall.