IRS lets listed crypto trusts stake under rules existing funds must adopt within six months
IRS Revenue Procedure 2026-20 lets exchange-listed crypto trusts stake and keep grantor-trust status, with six months for existing trusts to comply. Holders must receive the rewards in the same token or in cash, while the procedure leaves open how that income is taxed.
The Investor · Invest desk
What happened
- Rev. Proc. 2026-20 replaces Rev. Proc. 2025-31, the procedure that first set out a staking safe harbor for these trusts in November 2025.
- A qualifying trust may hold only cash and units of one type of digital asset running on a permissionless proof-of-stake network.
- Only the trust's custodians may control the staking addresses and private keys, and the IRS treats the trust as owning the tokens while they are staked.
- Trusts generally must make their tokens available for staking but may keep a liquidity reserve unstaked when the trustee or sponsor judges exchange redemption rules require one.
Why it matters
- decision A sponsor that also runs a staking business has to send its own trust's tokens to an unrelated provider, and the reward split is set at arm's length without it.
- exposure Sponsors and custodians may only tell the provider when to stake or unstake, so the trust's staking results depend on operations it is barred from controlling.
- cost Yield per token can differ between two trusts holding the same asset, because each sizes its unstaked reserve by its own reading of exchange redemption rules.
The legal basis for staking inside a grantor trust is a single characterisation. According to crypto.news's account of the procedure, the IRS treats staking as protecting and conserving trust property when it helps reduce the risk that one party or a coordinated group gains majority control over staked assets [11]. A trust meeting every condition can then stake and still count as an investment trust under Section 301.7701-4(c) and as a grantor trust [4]. It must hold both classifications before it starts [5].
Tracing one reward unit shows who gets paid. The custodians stake through one or more providers, and the division of rewards between provider and custodian has to be negotiated at arm's length [9]. What reaches the trust must be units of the token it already holds [12]. Those units, or the cash from selling them, then go to holders within the required timeframe [12].
Rewards therefore do not build up inside the fund, or rather, they sit there only briefly [12]. Newly received rewards are one of the categories a trust may hold unstaked for a time [14]. The others include tokens being sold for expenses or redemptions, tokens contributed for creations and tokens about to be distributed [14], plus liquidation, changes in law and steps to protect the assets [15].
The 2025 text lasted about 11 months [17]. Existing trusts can keep relying on it for six months from the Oct. 6 issue date [1][3], a window that closes around April 6, 2027 [18]. The crypto.news report does not list which conditions are new relative to the 2025 version, so the work each existing trust faces before April cannot be sized from it.
If existing trusts already use unrelated providers and pay rewards out, the six months is contract drafting, and most holdings end up staked under the new terms [3]. If some sponsors stake through affiliates, each has to choose between replacing the provider and losing the safe harbor [9][3]. I think the unrelated-provider rule moves more money than any other condition, because it decides who keeps the provider's cut of every reward [9]. The counter-case is the reserve. A sponsor that reads exchange redemption rules conservatively could leave enough tokens idle that the provider question matters less [13]. Large unstaked reserves described in existing trusts' SEC registration statements after April [6] would show I had the order wrong.
What to watch
- Updated SEC registration statements from existing staking trusts before about April 6, 2027, showing whether they changed providers or reserve policies.
- Any IRS guidance on how staking rewards distributed to trust holders are taxed, a question Rev. Proc. 2026-20 leaves outside its scope.
- Whether any sponsor with an affiliated staking business gives up the safe harbor instead of moving to an unrelated provider.
Clarity's read
What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.
Reality
- Evidence62
- Adoption
- Insufficient
- Hype gap+5
- Incentives
- Insufficient
- Confidence60
Claim ledger
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
- [1]
Revenue Procedure 2026-20 was issued on Oct. 6 and its safe harbor applies to eligible trusts holding digital assets on permissionless networks that use proof of stake to validate transactions.
- [2]
Rev. Proc. 2026-20 replaces Revenue Procedure 2025-31, which introduced the original framework in November 2025.
- [3]
Existing trusts have six months from Oct. 6 to adopt the revised requirements before they can no longer rely on the previous 2025 safe harbor.
- [4]
The IRS said trusts that meet all requirements under the new procedure can authorize staking and stake their digital assets while continuing to qualify as investment trusts under Section 301.7701-4(c) and as grantor trusts for federal income tax purposes.
- [5]
Eligibility is limited to arrangements formed as trusts under applicable state law that already qualify as investment trusts and grantor trusts before meeting the safe harbor requirements.
- [6]
Trust interests must trade on a national securities exchange, staking disclosures must be filed with the SEC through an effective registration statement, and the trust must comply with exchange rules and maintain liquidity risk policies.
- [7]
Trust assets are restricted to cash and units of a single type of digital asset operating on a permissionless proof of stake network.
- [8]
One or more custodians must hold the digital assets at addresses they control, with only those custodians able to access the private keys; the IRS said the trust retains ownership of the assets for federal income tax purposes while they are staked.
- [9]
Staking must be carried out through custodians working with one or more staking providers; the trust and its sponsor must remain unrelated to the staking provider, and contracts and the allocation of rewards between providers and custodians must be negotiated on arm's length terms.
- [10]
Trusts, sponsors and custodians cannot control the staking provider's operations beyond directing when eligible assets should be staked or unstaked.
- [11]
The procedure treats staking as a way of protecting and conserving trust property when it helps reduce the risk of one party or coordinated group gaining majority control over staked assets and carrying out transactions that could hurt their value.
- [12]
Staking rewards must consist of the same digital asset held by the trust, with equivalent units or cash proceeds distributed to holders within the required timeframe.
- [13]
Qualifying trusts generally have to make their digital assets available for staking, but can keep part unstaked when the trustee or sponsor reasonably determines a liquidity reserve is needed to comply with exchange redemption requirements; released assets must be made available for staking again as soon as reasonably possible.
- [14]
Temporary unstaked holdings are permitted when assets are being sold to cover trust expenses, cash distributions or redemptions, and when digital assets are contributed for creations, distributed to holders, purchased with contributed cash or received as staking rewards.
- [15]
Other exceptions cover liquidation, changes in applicable laws or regulations and steps taken to protect assets.
- [16]
The guidance does not provide a general tax exemption for staking income, and the IRS said no conclusions should be drawn about federal income tax issues not expressly addressed by the procedure.
- [17]
Rev. Proc. 2025-31 was in force for about 11 months before Rev. Proc. 2026-20 replaced it.
- [18]
The six-month window for existing trusts closes around April 6, 2027.
Sources
2 independent publishers whose own reporting we read for this story.
- crypto.newsIRS lets qualifying crypto trusts stake assets without losing tax status
1 article · October 6, 2026
- cryptobriefing.comIRS issues guidance on digital asset staking safe harbor for trusts
1 article · October 6, 2026
Topics and entities
Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.
Topics
- Digital asset taxationFollow
- Crypto exchange-traded productsFollow
- Crypto stakingFollow
Entities
- Revenue Procedure 2025-31Follow
- Revenue Procedure 2026-20Follow
- Internal Revenue ServiceFollow
- Securities and Exchange CommissionFollow