Independent advisory firms post 39% margins on 3.7% organic growth, a 10-year low
Consultancy The Ensemble Practice found 39% profit margins and 3.7% organic growth, a 10-year low, across more than 170 advisory firms in 2025. With equity scarce below the senior ranks, a recruiter expects buyers to pay less for founders' firms that have stopped growing.
The Investor · Invest desk
What happened
- Cash pay keeps rising, and the study says advisors are now one of the highest-compensated professions in the country.
- At least 78% of chief executives and 53% of senior advisors hold equity, against 14% of advisors one level below them.
- Bridgemark Strategies CEO Jeff Nash blames slow growth on an older advisor base that stays conservative about hiring junior talent while profits are healthy.
- Externally owned firms pay more cash and promote faster than advisor-owned ones, and their advisors change firms more often.
Why it matters
- Who has to decide decision Founders have to choose between spending part of their margin on junior hires and new clients now, or keeping it and betting that buyers pay for profit over growth.
- What it limits constraint Because equity is priced at multiples of profit, high margins make stakes dearer for the 86% of next-rung advisors who hold none.
- Who's exposed exposure Founder-owned firms stand to lose the next-rung advisors a buyer would count on as successors, since those advisors are paid mostly in salary and outside-owned rivals pay more.
A firm compounding organic growth at 3.7% a year takes about 19 years to double its business [12]. That rate is a 10-year low [2]. It sits under a 39% margin that American Banker's summary calls a record [11].
"Ultimately they're going to lose value in their business is really what's going to happen," said Jeff Nash, chief executive of the recruiting firm Bridgemark Strategies. "One of the cautions that buyers are really aware of is firms that are no longer growing." [16]
The study does not show firms raising salaries because growth slowed. It ties the cash-heavy pay to consolidation, which it says is turning owner-operated firms into a talent market "with increasingly complex compensation dynamics" [10]. It also ties it to the cost of ownership, which "has become very expensive in terms of multiples of profit" [5]. The ownership that exists stays near the top. A senior advisor is about 3.8 times as likely to hold equity as an advisor one rung below [13].
This could run more than one way before any founder sells. If buyers keep paying on profit and ignore slow growth, the founders who held back on junior hires [7] were right to keep the margin. If buyers mark down firms that have stopped growing, as Nash expects, the salaries saved come back out of the sale price. The third route runs through staff, since externally owned firms already pay more cash and promote faster [8]. The study's own line on that gap is "Efficient markets do not tolerate arbitrage." [9]
I think the staff route shows up first, because it does not need a deal to happen. An advisor paid mostly in salary can compare offers in any year [8]. The view is wrong if deal multiples for firms growing under 4% hold up against those paid for faster growers. The figures also come from a sample that American Banker says likely overrepresents the consultancy's past contacts and firms with outsize financial performance, though other recent studies reached similar findings [3].
What to watch
- Deal multiples paid for advisory firms growing under 4% organically, compared with those paid for faster-growing firms.
- Whether next year's Ensemble Practice survey moves the 14% equity share among advisors one rung below senior level.
- Advisor moves from founder-owned firms to externally owned ones that pay more cash.
Information, not investment advice. This story is general information about companies and markets, drawn from cited reporting. It is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security; check the cited sources before acting.
Clarity's read
What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.
Reality
- Evidence45
- Adoption
- Not scored
- Hype gap+15
- Incentives55
- Confidence50
Claim ledger
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
- [1]
The Ensemble Practice found 39% profit margins across more than 170 independent advisory firms in 2025.
- [2]
Organic growth rates at the firms were at a 10-year low of 3.7%.
- [3]
The study's participants likely overrepresent firms that have worked with or spoken to the consultancy, or that have outsize financial performance compared to average peers; the research added to other recent studies with similar findings.
- [4]
The study said cash compensation is growing and "advisors are now one of the highest-compensated professions in the country."
- [5]
"Yet equity is becoming less available across all firms, as it has become very expensive in terms of multiples of profit."
- [6]
At least 78% of CEOs said they have equity stakes and 53% of senior advisors reported owning them, compared to only 14% of advisors one rung below them.
- [7]
Jeff Nash, CEO and co-founder of recruiting firm Bridgemark Strategies, said the tumbling growth shows the result of "an older advisor base" that is "conservative" about hiring junior talent in a time of healthy profits.
- [8]
In advisor-owned firms advancement is slower and salaries dominate compensation; in firms with external ownership cash compensation is higher, promotions come faster, and advisors change firms more often.
- [9]
"Efficient markets do not tolerate arbitrage."
- [10]
The report said M&A consolidation is changing the industry from owner-operated firms offering long-term careers to a shifting talent market "with increasingly complex compensation dynamics."
- [11]
American Banker's summary describes the 39% profit margins as record margins.
- [12]
At 3.7% annual organic growth, a firm takes about 19 years to double its business.
- [13]
Senior advisors are about 3.8 times as likely as advisors one rung below to hold equity.
- [14]
About 86% of advisors one rung below senior advisors hold no equity.
- [15]
Founders riding high on current margins without actively hiring junior talent or acquiring new clients risk crippling their firm's valuation in eventual M&A deals.
- [16]
"Ultimately they're going to lose value in their business is really what's going to happen. One of the cautions that buyers are really aware of is firms that are no longer growing."
- [17]
A dearth of successors and other talent outside the founding advisor could cost founders if they eventually sell the business to an outside investor.
Get this ledger inside ChatGPT. Ask about any of our stories and the answer brings its figure, each claim’s verdict and the sources. Free, no account.
Sources
1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.
- americanbanker.comHow RIA consolidation and slow organic growth is changing compensation
1 article · September 29, 2026
Topics and entities
Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.