Invest1 publisher3 min readPublished
Gyeonggi asks Korea to factor chip-region contributions into how its Future Response Fund is invested
Gyeonggi Governor Choo Mi-ae wants Korea's planned 162.3 trillion won fund to reinvest its semiconductor tax windfall in the regions that produced it. Her proposals touch three of the fund's four accounts, and the criteria she wants would steer much of that money toward Yongin, Pyeongtaek and Icheon.
The Investor · Invest desk
What happened
- The fund would bank tax revenue collected beyond projections, driven partly by the chip boom, and spend it on young adults, growth engines, regional development, and education and talent.
- The province proposes splitting the regional future growth support fund 30% as a basic floor, 40% for balanced development and 30% for future growth demand.
- Gyeonggi also wants its youth basic income, 1 million won a year in local vouchers for 24-year-olds, turned into a national pilot project.
Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
- decision The government has to choose between the old allocation tax formula and a multi-factor one for regional money; keeping the old one leaves Gyeonggi pressing its whole claim through growth-engine project criteria.
- cost A higher national share for strategic-industry infrastructure would put the cost of power, water and transport at chip sites on the fund, leaving less of the 162.3 trillion won for other projects.
- constraint Under Gyeonggi's formula only 40% of regional money would follow balanced-development need, limiting how much of the account could be allocated on that ground alone.
- precedent Counting tax contribution when picking projects would tie the fund's spending to where the surplus was generated, a claim any revenue-producing region could then make.
Choo is asking for the same pool of money on two different principles. In the growth-engine account she wants it returned according to contribution. In the regional account she wants every local government guaranteed a floor, with size counted on top [7][10]. "Resources must follow where the burden lies," she said [5]. Her proposals reach three of the fund's four accounts, and only education and talent is left alone [2].
The regional proposal begins with an exclusion. "If the existing ordinary local allocation tax formula is applied as it is even though additional revenue has been generated, Gyeonggi Province, which receives no ordinary local allocation tax, could again be excluded from the allocation," Choo said, calling it "a contradiction and reverse discrimination" [9]. The province's replacement gives the largest single slice, 40%, to balanced development and splits the remaining 60% between a basic floor and future growth demand [10][1]. The formula would also weigh population, gross regional domestic product, investment demand and contribution to the national economy [10]. Choo described Gyeonggi as a province with a large population and many businesses and jobs [14].
The growth-engine pitch names places. "The fund's main revenue sources are not unrelated to the performance of industrial sites in Gyeonggi Province, such as Yongin, Pyeongtaek and Icheon," Choo said. "Semiconductor production hubs require enormous fiscal resources to build power, water, transportation networks and living conditions." [6] The province wants three tests applied when projects are chosen: a region's tax contribution, its investment in national strategic industries and its concentration of related companies [7]. It also wants a higher national share for large strategic infrastructure, and full state funding where necessary [7]. Every won the state puts into power and water at Yongin is a won the province does not spend from its own budget.
There are three ways this resolves. The government keeps the existing formula for the regional account, and Gyeonggi's claim moves entirely onto the growth-engine criteria. It adopts something close to the 30/40/30 split, and Gyeonggi takes a floor share next to every other local government. Or it raises the national share of strategic infrastructure, and the chip cities' utility and transport costs land on the fund. I think the third decides more about where the capital goes, because a contribution test applied to a surplus the chip boom helped produce sends money back toward the plants that produced it [3][7]. The report does not say how the 162.3 trillion won splits across the four accounts [4]. If the regional account turns out to be the largest, the formula fight matters more than the project criteria, and this view is wrong.
The meeting, held at the National Assembly by the Democratic Party and the government, was about the fund and a restructuring of the local allocation tax system [2]. Choo was one of 12 metropolitan mayors and governors from the party in the room [12]. A floor for Gyeonggi in the regional account comes out of the same pool every other local government draws on [10]. The province also wants a higher local consumption tax rate and part of corporate tax moved to metropolitan-level local taxes [11]. "I agree with the purpose of creating the fund," Choo said [13].
What to watch
- The government's split of the 162.3 trillion won across the young adults, growth engines, regional and education accounts.
- Whether tax contribution, strategic-industry investment or company concentration appear in the growth-engine project selection criteria.
- Whether the regional future growth support fund keeps the ordinary local allocation tax formula or adopts a multi-factor formula like Gyeonggi's 30/40/30.