Skip to content

ScienceReports disagree4 publishers3 min readPublished Updated

Gemini 4 Argon costs 2.7 times as much per task as GPT-6.1 Sol at the same token price

Google's Gemini 4 Argon matches GPT-6.1 Sol's $2/$10 token price but costs 2.7 times as much per task, according to Artificial Analysis. Argon uses more tokens per job, so buyers still have to compare frontier models by cost per completed task.

The Scientist · Science desk

How we use AISend a correction

Illustration accompanying Gemini 4 Argon costs 2.7 times as much per task as GPT-6.1 Sol at the same token price
Generated illustration

What happened

  • The $2/$10 rate is a 50% launch discount on standard pricing of $4/$20, and Google has not confirmed when the promotion ends.
  • On AA-Omniscience, Argon's hallucination rate is 15%, against 51% for GPT-6 Astra and 54% for GPT-6.1 Sol.
  • Access is limited to more than 650 cyber defenders in Google's Fairwind Program, for defensive use only.

Why it matters

  • cost Budgets set at the launch rate will understate spend, because Argon's per-task cost doubles whenever Google ends the promotion.
  • decision Choosing between Argon and Sol has to come down to cost per completed task on the buyer's own workload, and on the public index Sol is far cheaper by that measure.
  • capability Workloads where a confident wrong answer is expensive now have a frontier option that declines to guess far more often than OpenAI's current models do.
  • constraint Most enterprises cannot yet test Argon in production, so the only independent per-task cost evidence available to them comes from a single benchmarking firm.

Token rates are one input to a bill. The other is how much the model writes, and Artificial Analysis found Argon wordy. Across the full Intelligence Index, Argon generated 110 million tokens, against a median of 82 million for reasoning models in its price tier [11]. Per task, it writes about 2.3 times as many output tokens as GPT-6 Astra [20].

If the two models really charge the same rates, the gap with Sol comes from how many tokens each one uses. Argon costs $1.99 a task, 2.7 times Sol's figure, which puts Sol at about 74 cents a task [5][19]. That fits the firm's earlier finding that GPT-6.1 Sol runs at less than a quarter of GPT-6 Astra's cost per task. A quarter of Astra's $3.26 is about 82 cents [13][22]. Against Astra, Argon comes in at 60% of the per-task cost [5].

Forkast reported that Sol launched at the same rates a day before Argon [12], and it called the match "the commodity floor arriving in the frontier model tier" [26]. That floor holds only while Google's promotion runs. When it ends, Artificial Analysis expects Argon to cost $3.98 a task [15]. If OpenAI keeps Sol's price where it is, Argon would then cost about 5.4 times as much per task as Sol: the 2.7 multiple, doubled [23].

The evidence on what the extra money buys is mixed. Argon's headline coding score, 77.9% on DeepSWE v1.1, is Google's own figure, and Forkast notes that Google has not published independent verification [18]. The independent index behind the cost figures combines reasoning, knowledge, mathematics and coding [14].

The hallucination result is the most interesting number in the release, and it comes with lower accuracy. Argon gets 50% of AA-Omniscience questions right, 13 points below GPT-6 Astra. Its overall score of 42 sits beside Astra's 43 and Sol's 42 [17]. So Argon answers fewer questions correctly, but it guesses wrong far less often [16][17]. The thing this doesn't tell you is whether your workload is better served by a model that declines to answer.

The output limit is now 1 million tokens, up from 64,000 [9]. That changes what a single call can cost. A Gemini API feature called Long Decode Continuation pauses long responses and resumes them across follow-up calls, so reasoning can run that long without hitting request timeouts [10]. One full million-token response costs $10 in output tokens at the launch rate and $20 at standard pricing [21]. Even the context window is in dispute: Forkast reports 2 million tokens [24], while Artificial Analysis lists 1 million [25].

On a wider release, Google wrote that it will "continue to gather feedback from early testers as we iterate on guardrails before making Argon available to developers, enterprises, and consumers as soon as possible" [8].

What to watch

  • Google confirming an end date for the 50% promotion, which moves Argon's per-task cost from $1.99 to $3.98.
  • Independent DeepSWE v1.1 results for Argon against Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra, replacing Google's self-reported 77.9%.
  • Any change to Sol's rates, or to Argon's token use at general release, since either would change the 2.7x per-task gap.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence68
Adoption15
Hype gap+20
Incentives55
Confidence65

Perspective Coverage

4 publishers
Builder
Builder 36%
Operator
Operator 34%
Investor
Investor 30%
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    Gemini 4 Argon is currently being rolled out to selected users and is not publicly available.

    ReportedSupportedSource: Artificial Analysis4 sources— create a free account to open themView cited source
  2. [2]

    Gemini 4 Argon will launch at an introductory price of $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens, with cached input tokens priced at 95% off the input token price.

    ReportedSupportedSource: Google DeepMind blog3 sources— create a free account to open themView cited source
  3. [3]

    Google gated Argon behind its Fairwind Program, providing access to over 650 trusted cyber defenders, for defensive use only.

Sources

4 independent publishers whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. artificialanalysis.ai

    2 articles · September 29, 2026

    Artificial Analysis
  2. deepmind.google

    1 article · September 30, 2026

    Gemini 4 Argon: our next era of frontier intelligence
  3. forkast.news

    1 article · September 30, 2026

    Google’s Gemini 4 Argon Closes the Pricing Triangle. The Benchmark Lead Is the Real Story. – Forkast
  4. thenextweb.com

    1 article · October 2, 2026

    Gemini 4 Argon matches GPT-6 Astra and hallucinates far less in early tests

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Loading related stories