Skip to content

Security Not yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher 2 min read Published

Scammers rented BuzzFeed's reputation to impersonate Malwarebytes support

The callback number in the fake listing had already been used in scams impersonating McAfee and Norton. That makes the phone line the operator's durable asset, and the hosting platform is just an interchangeable front.

The Watch · Security desk

Send a correction

What happened

  • Malwarebytes says it found a listing on BuzzFeed posted by someone impersonating Malwarebytes Support, with a phone number as the point of contact for anyone who believed it.
  • The same phone number, according to Malwarebytes, has already been used in scams that impersonated McAfee and Norton, so the line predates this particular brand identity.
  • The listing sat in BuzzFeed's Quizzes section, a category with no relationship to security software or technical support of any kind.
  • Malwarebytes assesses the call leads to a tech support scam in which the caller is talked into granting remote access to their own device.

Why it matters

  • Who's exposed exposure The abuse lives under a major publisher's own domain and certificate, so the controls that catch lookalike domains see a legitimate site and pass it through.
  • What it limits constraint With the number unpublished, fraud teams cannot match an inbound call to known scam infrastructure without routing the question back through the vendor.
  • What's now possible capability Reusing one voice line across three security brands lets an operator change victims' expectations without changing anything expensive.
  • What it sets up precedent Moderation that removes pages faster than it retires phone numbers rewards the next operator for treating host platforms as disposable rented credibility.

The phone line is the durable asset here, while the page itself is disposable. Malwarebytes says the number in the listing had already run under McAfee's and Norton's names [5], which puts three impersonated security brands behind one callback number [15]. The cost of a brand swap is a form, a description, and a logo the operator does not own [13]. That inverts the usual takedown economics. The listing is consumable; the line is the fixed cost worth defending.

That makes the number the indicator a defender would want. The post does not carry it. Malwarebytes did not publish the number, the listing URL, or a takedown time. Instead, it offered to check numbers that readers send in [9]. The pivot that would let a help desk or fraud team match an inbound "Malwarebytes support" call against a known scam line stays on the vendor's side.

Domain-reputation controls have nothing to bite on. Malwarebytes lists the platform's own domain name and security certificate among the things a fake listing borrows, alongside its familiar design and the assumption that listings were reviewed [13]. A page served from a large publisher's certificate looks exactly like the publisher.

The cheapest available tell is placement. The support listing sat in BuzzFeed's Quizzes section [2], and Malwarebytes' own guidance is to treat unexpected numbers as untrusted, particularly when they surface in an unrelated category [10]. Its read of the intent is that callers get social-engineered into granting remote access to their devices [4], and that the advertised product is beside the point, because the goal is the call, the download, or the card details [14].

Weigh the evidence for what it is: one listing, self-reported by the brand being impersonated, without a victim count or a dated timeline [1][9]. The prevalence context is the vendor's own survey, where 47 percent of people said they encountered scams on social media at least weekly and 36 percent said the same of buying-and-selling platforms [6][7], an 11-point gap between the two channels [16]. Those figures count encounters, not losses.

What lifts this above a one-off is the reuse [15]. An operator who rotates host platforms and brand identities while keeping the same voice line is running a standing tech support fraud desk, and the moderation stack Malwarebytes describes (automated detection, seller controls, user reports, brand-protection programs, moderation teams) is built to pull pages down, while scammers rotate names, images, accounts, numbers and links faster than reviewers move [8]. Pages are cheap to lose. Malwarebytes' framing is the useful part: a trusted platform hosting a trusted brand name does not produce trust or verification [11].

What to watch

  • Whether Malwarebytes or BuzzFeed publishes the number so carriers and help desks can act on it as an indicator.
  • Whether the same line resurfaces under a fourth brand or on a different host platform, which would confirm a standing operation rather than a rotation of one-offs.
  • Whether BuzzFeed says how the listing was created and how long it stayed up.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence32
Adoption34
Hype gap+22
Incentives78
Confidence45
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    Malwarebytes reported that it recently found a listing on BuzzFeed from someone pretending to be Malwarebytes Support.

    Reported Supported Source: Malwarebytes blog2 sources— create a free account to open themView cited source
  2. [2]

    The example listing appeared in the "Quizzes" section of BuzzFeed.

  3. [3]

    Based on the phone number, Malwarebytes suspects the people behind the listing are trying to draw callers into a tech support scam.

Get this ledger inside ChatGPT. Ask about any of our stories and the answer brings its figure, each claim’s verdict and the sources. Free, no account.

Add to ChatGPTAdd to Claude

Sources

1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. malwarebytes.com

    1 article · August 27, 2026

    Fake listings can turn trusted platforms into scam springboards

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Topics

Loading related stories