Science1 publisher2 min readPublished
Astronomers map a record-distance proto-supercluster right where existing models expected it
The ODIN survey turned up 150 protoclusters from the universe's first three billion years. 3D follow-up on two of them shows structures on track to outgrow the Coma Cluster without straining the current cosmic-web picture.
The Scientist · Science desk
What happened
- The ODIN survey identified 150 distant protoclusters that formed when the universe was roughly 1 to 3 billion years old, using the Dark Energy Camera on the NSF Blanco 4-meter telescope in Chile.
- Follow-up spectroscopy, most of it from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument, converted two of the densest candidates into 3D maps of where their galaxies actually sit.
- One of the two, COSMOS-z3.1-A, is a proto-supercluster, the ancestor of a cluster of clusters, and the most distant such progenitor identified to date.
- Vandana Ramakrishnan's team, writing in The Astrophysical Journal, reports that both structures are on track to become more massive than the Coma Cluster.
Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
- cost Wide-area narrowband searches on shared national facilities run at least two-thirds of a night of 4-meter time per protocluster found, before a single spectrum, and that is the bill any group proposing to extend the catalogue has to justify.
- capability A spectrograph that reaches 5,000 targets at once makes it practical to promote several projected overdensities to measured structures in one campaign, which is the difference between a candidate list and a mapped object.
- constraint Ranking these structures above Coma is an extrapolation forward under the framework being tested, so nothing observable at their epoch can check it, and the comparison should not be asked to carry much weight.
- precedent A record-setting object that fits the models moves the burden onto abundance: the next useful test is how many such seeds a survey volume should contain, not how far away the current leader is.
A sky position is a projection, and galaxies that crowd together in two dimensions can be spread across enormous stretches of the line of sight. That is why ODIN's 2D coordinates for COSMOS-z3.1-A and COSMOS-z3.1-C were a starting point rather than a result [13]. The geometry came from spectrographs: most spectra from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument, which measures distances to 5,000 galaxies at once [15], with more from GMOS on Gemini South and DEIMOS on Keck II [16]. Graduate students Byeongha Moon at KASI and Nicole Firestone at Rutgers led that follow-up with Ramakrishnan [14].
Two of the 150 candidates got that treatment, about 1.3 percent of the catalogue [1]. Spending scarce spectroscopic time on the two most striking overdensities is defensible [12], and it also means the 3D picture rests on the objects selected for looking most unusual in projection.
Support for existing theory, as the announcement puts it [2], is a claim about consistency: a very massive seed at an early epoch is something the current picture permits. Consistency is a different matter from abundance. Models get stressed by how many such structures a given volume should contain, and the announcement reports no such comparison. Ramakrishnan describes the project's aim as understanding the growth of massive structures and how they influence the galaxies within them [8], which is a question about populations, best answered by counting many structures rather than showcasing one record-holder.
The Coma comparison needs the same care. Both structures are predicted to end up more massive than Coma, the largest known cluster nearby [18], and that comes from evolving a mapped overdensity forward under the same framework being tested, not from weighing anything at the epoch observed, when the universe was 2.1 billion years old [20]. COSMOS-z3.1-A carries the rarer label of proto-supercluster, ancestor of a cluster of clusters [19].
What the material does not settle is which galaxy population the narrowband filters select; the survey's name says only that the imaging is narrowband [9]. The tracer determines what fraction of each structure's galaxies you ever see, which is exactly the term you need pinned down before turning 150 candidates into a count of early massive seeds. That catalogue is where the current model of cosmic-web assembly can actually be put at risk; the distance record cannot do that work.
What to watch
- The Astrophysical Journal paper's counts per unit volume set against simulation predictions, which would turn a consistency check into a real test of the model.
- Spectroscopic follow-up on the remaining ODIN candidates, showing how many of the 150 survive as physical structures rather than projections.
- Any mass estimate for COSMOS-z3.1-A measured at its own epoch rather than extrapolated forward to the present day.