LeadershipNot yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher2 min readPublished
Tinder's scam filters struggled for years, a congressional investigation found
A congressional investigation lasting about a year found Tinder's scam detection struggled for years to keep fraudulent accounts off the app. Match Group has since added verification requirements and upgraded its detection technology.
The Board Room · Leadership desk

Sue Nuss lost more than $700,000 in total, per the committee's report. Americans reported nearly $1.5 billion in romance-scam losses last year, per the FTC. Scammers stole more than $1 trillion globally in one year, per a 2024 Global Anti-Scam Alliance report.
- 700,000 dollars Lost by Sue Nuss in total, more than, per committee report, claim 5
- $1.5 billion Americans' reported romance-scam losses last year, nearly, claim 3 per the Federal Trade Commission
- $1 trillion Stolen by scammers globally in one year, more than, claim 11 Global Anti-Scam Alliance, 2024 report
| Figure | Value | Note | Claim |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lost by Sue Nuss in total, more than, per committee report | 700,000 dollars | 5 | |
| Americans' reported romance-scam losses last year, nearly | $1.5 billion | per the Federal Trade Commission | 3 |
| Stolen by scammers globally in one year, more than | $1 trillion | Global Anti-Scam Alliance, 2024 report | 11 |
What happened
- The Federal Trade Commission put reported romance-scam losses for Americans at nearly $1.5 billion last year.
- The committee's report says one victim, Sue Nuss, lost more than $700,000 in total after meeting a scammer on Tinder.
- Nuss said the same scammer profile reappeared on Tinder days after the supposed relationship collapsed.
- The investigation targeted romance scams on Match Group platforms, a portfolio that includes Tinder, Hinge, Match and Plenty of Fish.
Why it matters
- exposure Match Group's detection record is now documented in a committee report, and any later failure will be measured against its new verification requirements.
- decision Other dating operators must decide whether to add verification friction before the Act's duties apply, and no effective date has been reported.
- cost Victims carry the loss: Nuss, who lost more than $700,000, said she no longer trusts her own decisions.
NBC News reported that Match Group has moved to address the shortcomings with new verification requirements and upgraded detection technology [2], though it did not describe the requirements or say when they apply.
Sue Nuss, 77, met a man on Tinder who claimed to be from New Jersey [13]. The committee's report says he duped her with fabricated crises: job problems on an oil rig, an arrest in Mexico, his mother's stroke and her funeral [14]. When Nuss realised it was a scam, she said, the same profile showed up on Tinder again days later [6]. Then a second group offered to recover her money and took more through a cryptocurrency scheme, and she believes the two groups were connected, according to the report [7].
A profile that returns after it has taken money is the sort of event detection systems are built to stop. That is our inference. We don't know whether anyone reported the first profile to Tinder.
The regulatory exposure is already on the calendar. Congress passed the Romance Scam Prevention Act last month, and it awaits the president's signature [8]. The duty it would create is to notify and warn users who are messaged by potential scammers [8]. A warning can only go out if the system has identified the sender as a potential scammer. In our view that turns detection accuracy from a product-quality measure into a compliance obligation, and it applies to every online dating provider, not only Match Group.
Sen. Maggie Hassan, who launched the investigation with Sen. Marsha Blackburn, argues the problem is larger than any one app. "Enterprises that run scams are now costing the global economy more than the illicit drug trade does," Hassan said [15]. A 2024 report from the Global Anti-Scam Alliance put global scam theft at more than $1 trillion in one year [11].
For an operator, the trade-off is sign-up friction against fraud downstream. Verification adds a step for every new user. How Match weighed that is unclear. The decision falls this quarter. If the Act is signed, next quarter's exposure is a detection miss that counts as a missed legal duty as well as a lost user.
What to watch
- Whether President Trump signs the Romance Scam Prevention Act, and when its warning duty takes effect for dating providers.
- What Match Group's new verification requirements contain and when they apply.
- Whether the Hassan-Scott bill for a central scam-reporting portal advances.
Clarity's read
What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.
Reality
- Evidence62
- Adoption55
- Hype gap+10
- Incentives50
- Confidence60
Claim ledger
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
- [1]
A congressional investigation that began in September 2025 and lasted about a year found that Tinder's scam detection systems struggled for years to keep fraudulent accounts off the dating app.
- [2]
Parent company Match Group has since moved to address the shortcomings with new verification requirements and upgraded detection technology.
- [3]
Romance scams cost Americans nearly $1.5 billion in reported losses last year, according to the Federal Trade Commission, and have become a leading form of financial fraud in the U.S.
- [4]
The Joint Economic Committee's report was published on Tuesday.
- [5]
According to the committee's report, Sue Nuss lost more than $700,000 in total.
- [6]
Days after what Nuss thought was a budding online relationship fell apart, her scammer showed back up on Tinder with the same profile, she said in an interview.
- [7]
Another group approached Nuss claiming it could recover what she had lost, then took more money through an elaborate cryptocurrency scheme; she believes both scammer groups were connected, the report stated.
- [8]
Congress last month passed the Romance Scam Prevention Act, which would require online dating service providers to notify and warn any users who get messaged by potential scammers; the bill awaits President Donald Trump's signature.
- [9]
This summer Sen. Maggie Hassan introduced legislation with Sen. Rick Scott to create a central reporting portal for victims of scams.
- [10]
The Joint Economic Committee's investigation sought to combat the prevalence of romance scams on platforms owned by Match Group, the biggest online dating company in the world, whose portfolio includes Tinder, Hinge, Match and Plenty of Fish.
- [11]
Scammers stole more than $1 trillion globally in one year, according to a 2024 report from the Global Anti-Scam Alliance.
- [12]
"I don't trust my decisions now," Nuss said.
- [13]
Nuss, 77, a Pennsylvania resident who turned to Tinder after losing her husband, met a man who claimed to be from New Jersey.
- [14]
The committee's report stated that the man duped Nuss with a series of fabricated crises: job problems on an oil rig, an arrest in Mexico, his mom's stroke and even her funeral, all excuses to ask for money.
- [15]
"Enterprises that run scams are now costing the global economy more than the illicit drug trade does," Hassan said.
Sources
1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.
- nbcnews.comRomance scammers are getting harder to catch. The consequences are costly.
1 article · October 13, 2026
Topics and entities
Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.
Topics
- Online fraud regulationFollow
- Romance scamsFollow
- Trust and SafetyFollow