Skip to content

Science1 publisher3 min readPublished

Seasonal chytrid maps rank Panama release sites for captive-bred harlequin toads

Smithsonian researchers found most harlequin toad species in Panama persist only where over 80% of seasons are unsuitable for serious chytrid infection. Maps built on that pattern now rank release sites for captive-bred toads, pending trials to test whether refuges raise survival.

The Scientist · Science desk

Illustration accompanying Seasonal chytrid maps rank Panama release sites for captive-bred harlequin toads

What happened

  • Chytrid, caused by the fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, has spread through Central and South America since the 1970s and is now ubiquitous.
  • The disease is believed to have pushed many neotropical frogs to the brink of extinction, including many harlequin toads of the genus Atelopus.
  • The team built new chytrid suitability maps from earlier models of where the disease occurs and when it is most severe.
  • Potential refuges are few today, but the models forecast some areas that could become unsuitable for chytrid as the climate changes.
  • The same models point to places where wild harlequin toad populations might still survive.

Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • decision Release teams can choose sites by seasonal chytrid risk before committing scarce captive-bred toads, where earlier releases went ahead without such a ranking and lost many animals.
  • constraint Until trials compare survival at ranked and unranked sites, the benefit of picking a refuge is a prediction, and programs cannot yet say how large it is.
  • exposure Mountain species could lose on both counts, since the warming that could push chytrid out of a site could also make it worse habitat for toads adapted to cool highlands.
  • capability Remnant wild populations found in predicted refuges could supply new genes to captive colonies and stock to reinforce wild ones.

Chytrid is present across almost all of the historic range of harlequin toads [4]. A map of where the fungus occurs would rule out nearly every site. The new maps count seasons instead, because chytrid disease rises and falls through the year the way influenza does, with temperature and humidity [4] [6].

The study, by the Smithsonian's National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute (NZCBI) and the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (STRI) in the Journal for Nature Conservation [1], checked its maps against the animals still alive. Most harlequin species in Panama persist only at sites where more than 80 percent of seasons were unsuitable for medium- and high-intensity infections [6]. At those sites, fewer than one season in five favors a serious infection [1].

The exception strengthens the result. If refuges protect toads by keeping the fungus down, a species that tolerates chytrid should be able to live outside them. The variable harlequin toad, Atelopus varius, is the only species found at disease-suitable sites, and the researchers say that fits evidence it may have evolved resistance [7].

The design is observational. It ties where toads survive today to where the fungus struggles. It does not measure whether a captive-bred toad released into a refuge outlives one released elsewhere, and the published account does not give the number of sites or species behind the 80 percent figure. The team intends to test the causal claim directly. "These tools will allow us to experimentally test the climate refugia hypothesis through future release trials," said Roberto Ibáñez, a STRI staff scientist and co-author [14].

Those trials matter because earlier releases lost many animals. "We have tried releasing captive-bred harlequin toads back into the wild and experienced high losses due to the amphibian chytrid fungus that persists in the environment," said Brian Gratwicke, a conservation biologist at NZCBI and the paper's senior author [8]. "By mapping climatic refuges, we finally have a tool to rank potential release sites, allowing us to select places where the released animals have the best chance of survival," he said [9].

The forecast of new refuges comes with a complication. The researchers note that a shifting climate could also harm frogs adapted to cooler mountain habitats [12]. Ibáñez said the site surveys draw on both the disease maps and maps of where the toads themselves can live. "Guided by these climate refugia and Atelopus habitat-suitability maps, we have already begun surveying potential sites for habitat suitability and potential release trials," he said [13].

The maps also give field teams somewhere to look for survivors. "Our ability to identify climate refugia is critical if we hope to locate populations that might have disappeared from most places in their former range," said Carrie Lewis, a doctoral candidate at George Mason University and the paper's lead author [10].

What to watch

  • Survival data from the first release trials at high-ranked refuge sites, especially if compared with releases at lower-ranked ones.
  • Whether surveys of predicted refuges turn up remnant wild Atelopus populations.
  • Whether the forecast future refuges also stay suitable habitat for mountain-adapted harlequin species as the climate shifts.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories