Skip to content

BuildNot yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher2 min readPublished

AutoGen tops three agent frameworks on GitHub stars and ranks last on monthly PyPI installs

AutoGen has about 60,400 GitHub stars, the most of three leading agent frameworks, but its own README puts it in maintenance mode. A dev.to audit verified on 2026-08-16 says to weigh installs and release history before stars when starting a new project.

The Engineer · Build desk

How we use AISend a correction

Illustration accompanying AutoGen tops three agent frameworks on GitHub stars and ranks last on monthly PyPI installs
Generated illustration
AutoGen trails both rivals on monthly PyPI installs Monthly PyPI installs for three agent frameworks, as reported in a dev.to post.

Bar chart of monthly PyPI installs: LangGraph roughly 71 million, CrewAI roughly 20.7 million, AutoGen about 1.08 million.

AutoGen trails both rivals on monthly PyPI installs (Monthly PyPI installs, per dev.to post)
ItemValueClaim
LangGraph, roughly71 million installs5
CrewAI, roughly20.7 million installs6
AutoGen, about1.08 million installs5

What happened

  • CrewAI holds 57,100 stars and LangGraph 39,800, so the framework now in maintenance mode out-stars both.
  • AutoGen's last tagged Python version, python-v0.7.5, shipped September 30, 2025, 320 days before the check, and the repo has had no commit since April 15, 2026.
  • The post names Microsoft Agent Framework, generally available since 2026-04-03, as AutoGen's successor.

Why it matters

  • decision A team starting now can choose on stated conditions: LangGraph for auditable control flow and durable state if it can staff the persistence work, CrewAI for fast prototyping if it accepts model-mediated delegation.
  • cost A team already on AutoGen faces a rewrite to reach Microsoft Agent Framework, so the cost lands as engineering time on projects that have already shipped.
  • contradiction The post's takeaways tell new projects to start on Microsoft Agent Framework, while its short answer sends new work to LangGraph or CrewAI and reserves the Microsoft framework for teams leaving AutoGen.

Stars only accumulate. The post says a star count reflects bookmarks made when the hype peaked, for AutoGen during its v0.2 launch period in 2024, and that they are never removed when a project goes quiet [10]. Installs run the other way, because each CI run or image rebuild that pulls the package is a recurring production cost [11].

CrewAI sits between the two on installs, at about 20.7 million a month [6]. Divide the post's install figures by its star counts and the gap widens. LangGraph comes to about 1,780 monthly installs per star [16]. AutoGen comes to about 18 [17]. That is a difference of roughly 100 times [18]. The post turns this into a heuristic: a high star-to-install ratio is a freshness signal in reverse, a mark of a project that was once exciting and is no longer relied on in production [23].

The ratio is a proxy, and the post says what the install counts contain. PyPI counts include CI pipelines and container rebuilds, so they are not user counts [12]. LangGraph is also pulled in transitively by the wider LangChain ecosystem [13]. Some of its volume therefore comes from projects that depend on it without having chosen it. For the 65x gap to transfer to your own shortlist [5], most of that volume would have to be deliberate, direct installs. The post asks readers to treat the figure as a relative signal, not an absolute [12].

The README is the better primary source. Its banner is addressed to new users and directs them elsewhere [4]. For code already written on AutoGen, the post names AG2, a fork and not a rebrand [8].

The post sorts the three by how they fail at scale: LangGraph on checkpoint growth, CrewAI on prompt-mediated delegation, AutoGen on maintenance [20]. A team can size the first two before it commits. The cheapest option is also on the list. If the workflow is three LLM calls in a loop, the post says to use no framework at all [22].

Everything here is one author's snapshot. The post says it took its facts from GitHub's REST API, PyPI's release history, the official READMEs, migration guides from the vendors and public issue trackers, and checked them all on 2026-08-16 against Microsoft Agent Framework 1.0, AutoGen 0.7.5, CrewAI 1.15.16 and LangGraph 1.2.11 [14]. It warns that the category moves within weeks and says to check those versions on PyPI before acting [15]. The author wrote: "Don't pick on star counts. Pick on what shipped, what broke, and what's still being maintained." [24]

What to watch

  • Any new AutoGen Python release after python-v0.7.5, or a commit after April 15, 2026, would test the maintenance-mode reading.
  • A re-check of LangGraph 1.2.11, CrewAI 1.15.16 and Microsoft Agent Framework 1.0 on PyPI, since the post says the category moves within weeks.
  • A split of LangGraph's PyPI installs into direct and transitive would show how much of the 65x gap reflects deliberate choice.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence58
Adoption62
Hype gap+12
Incentives
Insufficient
Confidence55
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    AutoGen holds roughly 60,400 GitHub stars.

    ReportedSupportedSource: dev.to post, figures verified 2026-08-16View cited source
  2. [2]

    CrewAI has 57,100 GitHub stars and LangGraph has 39,800.

    ReportedSupportedSource: dev.to postView cited source
  3. [3]

    AutoGen's last tagged Python version, python-v0.7.5, shipped on September 30, 2025, which is 320 days before the check, and the repo has had no commit pushed since April 15, 2026.

    ReportedSupportedSource: dev.to postView cited source

Sources

1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. dev.to

    1 article · October 12, 2026

    AI Agent Frameworks Compared: LangGraph vs CrewAI vs AutoGen

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Loading related stories