BuildNot yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher2 min readPublished
AutoGen tops three agent frameworks on GitHub stars and ranks last on monthly PyPI installs
AutoGen has about 60,400 GitHub stars, the most of three leading agent frameworks, but its own README puts it in maintenance mode. A dev.to audit verified on 2026-08-16 says to weigh installs and release history before stars when starting a new project.
The Engineer · Build desk

Bar chart of monthly PyPI installs: LangGraph roughly 71 million, CrewAI roughly 20.7 million, AutoGen about 1.08 million.
Monthly PyPI installs, per dev.to post In million installs
| Item | Value | Claim |
|---|---|---|
| LangGraph, roughly | 71 million installs | 5 |
| CrewAI, roughly | 20.7 million installs | 6 |
| AutoGen, about | 1.08 million installs | 5 |
What happened
- CrewAI holds 57,100 stars and LangGraph 39,800, so the framework now in maintenance mode out-stars both.
- AutoGen's last tagged Python version, python-v0.7.5, shipped September 30, 2025, 320 days before the check, and the repo has had no commit since April 15, 2026.
- The post names Microsoft Agent Framework, generally available since 2026-04-03, as AutoGen's successor.
Why it matters
- decision A team starting now can choose on stated conditions: LangGraph for auditable control flow and durable state if it can staff the persistence work, CrewAI for fast prototyping if it accepts model-mediated delegation.
- cost A team already on AutoGen faces a rewrite to reach Microsoft Agent Framework, so the cost lands as engineering time on projects that have already shipped.
- contradiction The post's takeaways tell new projects to start on Microsoft Agent Framework, while its short answer sends new work to LangGraph or CrewAI and reserves the Microsoft framework for teams leaving AutoGen.
Stars only accumulate. The post says a star count reflects bookmarks made when the hype peaked, for AutoGen during its v0.2 launch period in 2024, and that they are never removed when a project goes quiet [10]. Installs run the other way, because each CI run or image rebuild that pulls the package is a recurring production cost [11].
CrewAI sits between the two on installs, at about 20.7 million a month [6]. Divide the post's install figures by its star counts and the gap widens. LangGraph comes to about 1,780 monthly installs per star [16]. AutoGen comes to about 18 [17]. That is a difference of roughly 100 times [18]. The post turns this into a heuristic: a high star-to-install ratio is a freshness signal in reverse, a mark of a project that was once exciting and is no longer relied on in production [23].
The ratio is a proxy, and the post says what the install counts contain. PyPI counts include CI pipelines and container rebuilds, so they are not user counts [12]. LangGraph is also pulled in transitively by the wider LangChain ecosystem [13]. Some of its volume therefore comes from projects that depend on it without having chosen it. For the 65x gap to transfer to your own shortlist [5], most of that volume would have to be deliberate, direct installs. The post asks readers to treat the figure as a relative signal, not an absolute [12].
The README is the better primary source. Its banner is addressed to new users and directs them elsewhere [4]. For code already written on AutoGen, the post names AG2, a fork and not a rebrand [8].
The post sorts the three by how they fail at scale: LangGraph on checkpoint growth, CrewAI on prompt-mediated delegation, AutoGen on maintenance [20]. A team can size the first two before it commits. The cheapest option is also on the list. If the workflow is three LLM calls in a loop, the post says to use no framework at all [22].
Everything here is one author's snapshot. The post says it took its facts from GitHub's REST API, PyPI's release history, the official READMEs, migration guides from the vendors and public issue trackers, and checked them all on 2026-08-16 against Microsoft Agent Framework 1.0, AutoGen 0.7.5, CrewAI 1.15.16 and LangGraph 1.2.11 [14]. It warns that the category moves within weeks and says to check those versions on PyPI before acting [15]. The author wrote: "Don't pick on star counts. Pick on what shipped, what broke, and what's still being maintained." [24]
What to watch
- Any new AutoGen Python release after python-v0.7.5, or a commit after April 15, 2026, would test the maintenance-mode reading.
- A re-check of LangGraph 1.2.11, CrewAI 1.15.16 and Microsoft Agent Framework 1.0 on PyPI, since the post says the category moves within weeks.
- A split of LangGraph's PyPI installs into direct and transitive would show how much of the 65x gap reflects deliberate choice.
Clarity's read
What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.
Reality
- Evidence58
- Adoption62
- Hype gap+12
- Incentives
- Insufficient
- Confidence55
Claim ledger
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
- [1]
AutoGen holds roughly 60,400 GitHub stars.
- [2]
CrewAI has 57,100 GitHub stars and LangGraph has 39,800.
- [3]
AutoGen's last tagged Python version, python-v0.7.5, shipped on September 30, 2025, which is 320 days before the check, and the repo has had no commit pushed since April 15, 2026.
- [4]
AutoGen is in maintenance mode per its own README, which as of August 2026 carries a maintenance-mode banner directing new users elsewhere.
- [5]
LangGraph ships roughly 71 million monthly PyPI installs and AutoGen about 1.08 million, which the post calls a 65x gap.
- [6]
CrewAI sits at roughly 20.7 million monthly PyPI installs.
- [7]
Microsoft Agent Framework, generally available since 2026-04-03, is AutoGen's successor.
- [8]
AG2 is a real option for legacy AutoGen codebases, and it is a fork, not a rebrand.
- [9]
For teams already on AutoGen, the move to Microsoft Agent Framework is a rewrite rather than an upgrade.
- [10]
Stars are a lagging indicator: they record what got bookmarked at peak hype, which for AutoGen was the v0.2 launch era in 2024, and they are never removed even when a project goes quiet.
- [11]
Installs are a recurring production cost, paid every time CI runs or an image rebuilds.
- [12]
PyPI counts include CI pipelines and container rebuilds, so they are not user counts; the post says to treat them as a relative signal, not an absolute.
- [13]
LangGraph benefits from being pulled in transitively by the wider LangChain ecosystem, which inflates its install count.
- [14]
The post says every fact comes from the GitHub REST API, PyPI release history, official READMEs, vendor migration guides and public issue trackers, verified on 2026-08-16 against LangGraph 1.2.11, CrewAI 1.15.16, AutoGen 0.7.5 and Microsoft Agent Framework 1.0.
- [15]
The post says this category moves within weeks and tells readers to check those versions on PyPI before acting.
- [16]
LangGraph has about 1,780 monthly PyPI installs per GitHub star.
- [17]
AutoGen has about 18 monthly PyPI installs per GitHub star.
- [18]
LangGraph's installs per star are roughly 100 times AutoGen's.
- [19]
The post's key takeaways say the successor is Microsoft Agent Framework and that new projects should start there, while its short answer says a team already on AutoGen should target it and sends new work to LangGraph or CrewAI.
- [20]
What separates the frameworks is what fails at scale: LangGraph breaks on checkpoint growth, CrewAI breaks on prompt-mediated delegation, AutoGen breaks on maintenance.
- [21]
The post says to pick LangGraph if you need explicit, auditable control flow and durable state and can staff the persistence work it brings, and to pick CrewAI if you are prototyping multi-agent workflows fast and accept that delegation is model-mediated.
- [22]
If the workflow is three LLM calls in a loop, the post says to use no framework at all.
- [23]
The post proposes treating the star-to-install ratio as a freshness signal in reverse: a high ratio means a project was once exciting and now is not load-bearing anywhere.
- [24]
"Don't pick on star counts. Pick on what shipped, what broke, and what's still being maintained."
Sources
1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.
- dev.toAI Agent Frameworks Compared: LangGraph vs CrewAI vs AutoGen
1 article · October 12, 2026
Topics and entities
Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.
Topics
- Open-source maintainer economicsFollow
- AI agent frameworksFollow
- Package install metricsFollow