Build1 distinct publisher3 min readUpdated
A forecast filed with a Hong Kong IPO puts data center optics at $144.4 billion in 2030, and the $15 billion already spent means rack decisions made now are bets on a moving roadmap.
The Engineer · Build desk

Compiled by The EngineerSomething wrong?How this is made
A consultancy forecast attached to a Hong Kong IPO filing puts the data center optical interconnect market at $144.4 billion in 2030, up from $13.7 billion in 2024, a 48.1% compound annual growth rate [1]. That is a roughly 10.5-fold increase over six years in a layer that most buyers have historically treated as a line item under the accelerator, not alongside it [11].
Read the provenance before the number. The projection comes from a China Insights Consultancy report commissioned by Yuanjie Semiconductors, a Chinese laser-chip maker, as part of its listing documents, and draws on LightCounting data plus expert interviews [2]. Yuanjie makes the one component that both competing architectures require, because a laser chip is needed whether it feeds a co-packaged photonic integrated circuit or a pluggable module [8]. A forecast that grows the addressable market for lasers by an order of magnitude is, among other things, a sales document.
The engineering underneath it is less arguable. Copper is cheap, reliable and easy to integrate, but its power draw and signal loss rise sharply with bandwidth and distance [16]. Past a few hundred gigabits per lane, usable copper reach collapses to a meter or two before loss and power become unmanageable [6]. That is the constraint driving the transition, and it is a physical one, not a procurement fashion.
The share shift is the part worth planning around. Silicon photonics is projected to take 63.7% of 2030 revenue, up from 16.6% in 2020 [3], a swing of 47.1 percentage points in the mix [14]. At the headline market size that implies roughly $92 billion of silicon photonics revenue in 2030 [12]. The reason is manufacturing: silicon photonics patterns optical circuitry onto silicon using the same mature, high-volume CMOS processes as ordinary chips, which makes PICs mass-producible, while silicon cannot lase, so laser chips stay on more expensive III-V materials such as indium phosphide [9].
Co-packaged optics is what makes the mix shift matter for rack design. CPO pulls the optical engine out of the faceplate module and places the PIC directly on the switch or accelerator package, shortening the electrical path from inches of board trace to millimeters [7]. The laser cannot come along, because laser chips are heat-sensitive and the co-packaged part runs extremely hot, so it remains a separate device [8]. Pluggable transceivers stay the industry mainstay while link rates climb from 400G to 800G to 1.6T [10].
Money is already moving ahead of the forecast. Over the past year the AI industry has put more than $15 billion into co-packaged optics, photonic chips, faster transceiver modules and fiber, via new integration techniques, acquisitions of photonics startups and alliances among the largest players [4]. That single year of investment exceeds the entire 2024 market revenue of $13.7 billion [13], which tells you the spend is building capacity for a market that does not exist yet.
Watch the design-tool layer as the leading indicator. OpenLight and Tower Semiconductor have put OpenLight's photonic design kit inside Cadence's mainstream chip-design software, making laser-integrated 400G and 1.6T chips easier to design and bring to market [5], with an approach that integrates III-V laser material directly with silicon photonics [15]. Design kits landing in mainstream EDA flows precede design starts by a year or more, so that is where the 2030 mix gets decided. The other thing to watch is laser supply: it is the one part that cannot be CMOS-ified, and it sits on the critical path for both architectures [8][9].
Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
The forecast comes from a China Insights Consultancy (CIC) report commissioned by Yuanjie Semiconductors, a Chinese laser-chip maker, as part of its Hong Kong IPO filing; the report draws on data from LightCounting and interviews with industry experts.
OpenLight and Tower Semiconductor placed OpenLight's photonic design kit inside Cadence's mainstream chip-design software, a step that makes the laser-integrated 400G and 1.6T chips at the heart of co-packaged optics easier to design and bring to market.
Past a few hundred gigabits per lane, copper's usable reach collapses to a meter or two before signal loss and power draw become unmanageable.
Co-packaged optics pulls the optical engine out of the pluggable module and places it as a photonic integrated circuit directly on the switch or accelerator package, shrinking the electrical path from inches of board trace to millimeters.
Laser chips are highly heat-sensitive and cannot be folded into the PIC, which in co-packaged optics becomes part of a switch or accelerator package that runs extremely hot, so the laser remains a separate chip; laser chips are always needed, whether feeding a co-packaged PIC or a pluggable module.
Silicon photonics patterns optical circuitry onto silicon using the same mature, high-volume CMOS processes as ordinary chips, making PICs mass-producible, but silicon cannot lase, so laser chips still rely on more expensive III-V materials such as indium phosphide.
Evidence-backed comparisons of source perspectives and observed adoption signals. Read the methodology
Which Builder, Operator, and Investor concerns the observed source mix emphasized—not a truth score.
Evidence, demonstrated adoption, hype gap, incentives, and confidence are assessed independently, each on its own current evidence. How these are measured.
One publisher, one commissioned forecast
All material comes from a single article resting on a single CIC report commissioned by the company whose product the forecast favors. The engineering claims (copper reach limits, CPO packaging, CMOS silicon photonics versus III-V lasers) are specific and internally consistent, which lifts the floor, but the quantitative core has no independent forecaster, no primary filing excerpt, and no named buyer to check it against.
Real supply-side motion, no deployment metrics
There are concrete adoption signals: a photonic design kit shipping inside mainstream Cadence tooling, an IPO filing built on this market, and pluggable link rates progressing 400G to 800G to 1.6T. But the only demand-side quantity is an unbroken-out $15 billion industry spend figure; there are no named deployments, unit volumes, customer disclosures, or co-packaged optics production data.
Forecast runs ahead of shown evidence
A 48.1% blended CAGR, a 68.5% silicon photonics CAGR and a 561.5% scale-up CAGR compounding off a near-zero 2024 base are extraordinary numbers presented on the authority of one report commissioned by an IPO issuer that sells into the trend. The underlying physics and packaging story is sound and the source does disclose provenance and the near-zero-base caveat, so this is overstatement of magnitude and timing rather than a fabricated trend.
Forecast commissioned by an IPO issuer
The forecast was paid for by Yuanjie Semiconductors and filed as part of its Hong Kong IPO, and the article states laser chips like Yuanjie's are needed under both co-packaged and pluggable architectures — so a larger, faster-growing optical interconnect market directly supports the issuer's listing case. The design-tool news similarly comes from vendors (OpenLight, Tower, Cadence) with commercial interest in photonic design adoption.
Direction credible, numbers unverified
Confidence is moderate and split by claim type: the technical and architectural claims are coherent, self-consistent and unlikely to be wrong in direction, while the market sizing, share split and investment aggregate depend on one commissioned report relayed by one publisher. The source's own disclosures raise confidence in its reporting integrity without raising confidence in the figures.
build
The $40M order matters more than the $22M SAFE at Relativity Networks2 distinct publishers
build
Temporal talks $12B six months after $5B: durable execution is now agent infrastructure1 distinct publisher
Distinct publishers with included, body-backed reporting in this cluster.